Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 39 of 46  [ 457 posts ]  Go to page « 137 38 39 40 4146 »
Author Message
Thiel
Post subject: Re: Design forum for "AU" Northern KingdomPosted: May 17th, 2011, 10:37 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 5376
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark
Mitch, you seem to fail to understand what the interfaces/converters do.
They translate the signal from one unit so the receiving unit can understand them. However, this doesn't necessarily mean that the receiver can use them.
WarPac equipment is designed and structured markedly different (At least according to what's available on the net) due to amongst others an entirely different maintenance culture.
NATO equipment can be combined fairly easily because it's all designed to be compatible with STANAG 5511 and 5516, but as you yourself say, you'll still need specialized interfaces between the units.
As far as I'm aware all the cases where Soviet and NATO equipment has been used together, the integration has either been very expensive and protracted or kept together with string, tape and sweat.

_________________
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Mitchell van Os
Post subject: Re: Design forum for "AU" Northern KingdomPosted: May 17th, 2011, 12:09 pm
Offline
Posts: 1056
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 5:19 pm
You probaly fail to understand that these interfaces are already alive. And easy to install.

It isnt hard to change signals and let them interact. The only thing you need, is probaly some space!
We have 2 Vaxes on M fregates, they are Civilian, and to interact with militairy stuff, we need an interface. Wich is quite huge.

Everything can work togheter, that is not the issue.

_________________
Fryssian AU with Lt.Maverick 114
viewtopic.php?f=14&t=9802&p=193331#p193331
[ img ]
Embarked on: HNLMS Karel Doorman A833
To do list:
-Zeven Provincien class cruiser
-Joint support ship all sides
-F124 Sachsen class frigate
-F125 Baden-Württemberg class frigate
-Clemencau class aircraft carrier
-Zeven provincien class frigate
-Poolster class AOR
-Amsterdam class AOR
-Minas Gerais aircraft carrier


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Thiel
Post subject: Re: Design forum for "AU" Northern KingdomPosted: May 17th, 2011, 2:47 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 5376
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark
No Mitchell, they are not. Within NATO they are, but that's only possible to do because the systems are build to be able to talk with each other from the start. This is a very important feature.
By vaxes do you mean the Virtual Address eXtension?

_________________
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
heuhen
Post subject: Re: Design forum for "AU" Northern KingdomPosted: May 18th, 2011, 4:39 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 9102
Joined: December 15th, 2010, 10:13 pm
Location: Behind you, looking at you with my mustache!
[ img ]

not yet finish!
[ img ]
http://i1106.photobucket.com/albums/h37 ... type-2.png
do we have a good drawing of a 8 / 16 cell MK-41 VLS?


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
acelanceloet
Post subject: Re: Design forum for "AU" Northern KingdomPosted: May 18th, 2011, 4:42 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 7510
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands
2 points, both for the above ones as the below one still needs fixes from my last post :P :
- SPY-1 should be angled 90 degrees with each other, right now you have an large blind spot to the sides
- those props are just awfull, PLEASE change them for something else.... your second ship shows that you can draw good props, so....

_________________
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
bezobrazov
Post subject: Re: Design forum for "AU" Northern KingdomPosted: May 18th, 2011, 5:06 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 3406
Joined: July 29th, 2010, 2:20 pm
Ok, HeuHen, have to admit that you're a daring designer. But what about the sogging-like stern section of the bottom of your Bravo-frigate design? Just looks odd, but I'm sure you have a good reason for it!

_________________
My Avatar:Петр Алексеевич Безобразов (Petr Alekseevich Bezobrazov), Вице-адмирал , царская ВМФ России(1845-1906) - I sign my drawings as Ari Saarinen


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Thiel
Post subject: Re: Design forum for "AU" Northern KingdomPosted: May 18th, 2011, 5:09 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 5376
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark
I'm guessing enclosed mooring gear with the hatches closed.

_________________
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
bezobrazov
Post subject: Re: Design forum for "AU" Northern KingdomPosted: May 18th, 2011, 6:14 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 3406
Joined: July 29th, 2010, 2:20 pm
Thiel, I'm not sure you are referring to the same thing i was curious about.I should've formulated myself better: i meant the downward angle of the Bravo-type's stern bottom section, which appears to have been curved in such a manner as to make it look like the ship's bottom is sogging aft.

_________________
My Avatar:Петр Алексеевич Безобразов (Petr Alekseevich Bezobrazov), Вице-адмирал , царская ВМФ России(1845-1906) - I sign my drawings as Ari Saarinen


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Thiel
Post subject: Re: Design forum for "AU" Northern KingdomPosted: May 18th, 2011, 6:29 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 5376
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark
Oh. I hadn't noticed that.

_________________
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
heuhen
Post subject: Re: Design forum for "AU" Northern KingdomPosted: May 18th, 2011, 7:36 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 9102
Joined: December 15th, 2010, 10:13 pm
Location: Behind you, looking at you with my mustache!
bezobrazov wrote:
Thiel, I'm not sure you are referring to the same thing i was curious about.I should've formulated myself better: i meant the downward angle of the Bravo-type's stern bottom section, which appears to have been curved in such a manner as to make it look like the ship's bottom is sogging aft.
do not know why it just happened :shock:


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 39 of 46  [ 457 posts ]  Return to “Alternate Universe Designs” | Go to page « 137 38 39 40 4146 »

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]