I say, put Mirador high on up, maybe where the navigational set is, and since you're going to be ditching SPG-60 you can put the nav set where the SPG-60 is now. The higher up your opticals, the more effective they become. This is why they're mounted on retractable pole masts in Army use.
Posts:5376 Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark
Well, it was a five minute hatchet job.
_________________ “Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error
You can't have propellor shafts just hanging there; they need bracing. Which means you'll probably need longer shafts to make sure they fit. Otherwise I guess it'll work though I'd ask others for feedback (PM them if you need to, that's what PMs are for)
Posts:5376 Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark
The bow could use some work. I can't remember ever seeing a ship of that size with a flared bow like that, that's usually the domain of old cruisers and BBs. The stern could do with a bit of slimming, and the entire hull needs a clean-up.
You also need liferafts, satcoms, railings, and given that this is just a patrol boat with a punch, a RHIB for inspection work.
Details like exterior lights and navigational lights wouldn't be amiss either.
Your nav radar is placed in a rather sub-optimal position, and the platform that holds the Mirador looks very crude.
_________________ “Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error