Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 1 of 1  [ 9 posts ] 
Author Message
AlexitoBB
Post subject: Montana (BB-67) Alternative conceptPosted: July 11th, 2022, 4:47 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 139
Joined: May 19th, 2021, 2:22 am
Contact: Website
USA, USS Montana (BB-67) Alternative concept

[ img ]

[ img ]

_________________
WIP-Actual Proyekts

Kriegsmarine
-AU German Navy (2021)
Imperial Japanese Navy
-AU Japanese navy (1960)
Regia Marina
-AU Italian navy
PLA Navy
-AU Chinese Navy (2020)


Last edited by AlexitoBB on July 23rd, 2022, 8:24 pm, edited 3 times in total.

Top
[Profile] [Quote]
BB1987
Post subject: Re: Montana (BB-67) Alternative conceptPosted: July 12th, 2022, 10:33 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2818
Joined: May 23rd, 2012, 1:01 pm
Location: Rome - Italy
Looks good but I'd check the layers, in multiple spots I see equipment overlapping (like masts and gun tubs forward and aft)

_________________
My Worklist
Sources and documentations are the most welcome.

-Koko Kyouwakoku (Republic of Koko)
-Koko's carrier-based aircrafts of WWII
-Koko Kaiun Yuso Kaisha - KoKaYu Line (Koko AU spinoff)
-Koko - Civil Aviation


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
AlexitoBB
Post subject: Re: Montana (BB-67) Alternative conceptPosted: July 23rd, 2022, 8:37 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 139
Joined: May 19th, 2021, 2:22 am
Contact: Website
USA, USS Ohio (BB-68)

[ img ]

USA, USS New Hampshire (BB-70)

[ img ]


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
AlexitoBB
Post subject: Re: Montana (BB-67) Alternative conceptPosted: July 23rd, 2022, 8:41 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 139
Joined: May 19th, 2021, 2:22 am
Contact: Website
USS Ohio (BB-68) With Naval Camo.

[ img ]


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
AlexitoBB
Post subject: Re: Montana (BB-67) Alternative conceptPosted: July 23rd, 2022, 10:50 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 139
Joined: May 19th, 2021, 2:22 am
Contact: Website
USS Maine (BB-69) With Naval Camo.

[ img ]


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Rob2012
Post subject: Re: Montana (BB-67) Alternative conceptPosted: July 23rd, 2022, 10:54 pm
Offline
Posts: 105
Joined: April 24th, 2017, 8:54 pm
Great drawings, would love to see a modernized version of this class, like they did with the Iowa class.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
AlexitoBB
Post subject: Re: Montana (BB-67) Alternative conceptPosted: July 24th, 2022, 1:00 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 139
Joined: May 19th, 2021, 2:22 am
Contact: Website
USS New Hampshire (BB-70) With Naval Camo.

[ img ]


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
AlexitoBB
Post subject: Re: Montana (BB-67) Alternative conceptPosted: July 24th, 2022, 1:28 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 139
Joined: May 19th, 2021, 2:22 am
Contact: Website
(AU) United States, Montana-Class (40's)

[ img ]

The US Navy's Montana-class battleships were planned as successors to the Iowa class, being slower but larger, better protected, and with superior firepower than the Iowa class. Five units were approved for construction. during World War II, but changes in the theater of war shifted construction priorities resulting in their cancellation in favor of the Essex-class carriers before any of these superdreadnoughts' keels were laid down.

With a planned armament of 12 16-inch (406 mm) guns and with greater anti-aircraft capability than the preceding Iowa class as well as a thicker armored belt, the Montanas would have been the largest, best protected and most heavily armed battleships in the world. that the United States had put into the sea. They would have been the only battleships in the United States Navy that could have rivaled the Yamato-class battleships of the Empire of Japan in terms of armor, armament, broadside weight, and displacement.

Preliminary design work for the Montana began before the United States' entry into World War II. The first two ships were approved by Congress in 1939 after passing the Second Vinson Act. The Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor delayed construction of the Montana class. The combat success of the carriers at the Battle of the Coral Sea and, to a greater extent, the Battle of Midway, diminished the value of the battleship. Consequently, the US Navy chose to cancel the Montana class in favor of the most urgently needed aircraft carriers, amphibious ships, and antisubmarine ships; although orders for the Iowas were withheld as these were fast enough to escort the newer Essex-class carriers. The Montana class was the last battleship to be designed by the US Navy but her keels were never laid down; the four completed Iowa-class battleships were the last to be commissioned.

General characteristics (varies around class)

Ships in Class
• USS Montana (BB-67)
• USS Ohio (BB-68)
• USS Maine (BB-69)
• USS New Hampshire (BB-70)

Displacement
• 66,040 t (standard)
• 72 104 t (at full load)
Length
• 280.57 m (920 ft 6 in)2
Sleeve
• 36.88 m (121 ft 0 in)2
fretwork
• 11.00 m (36 ft 1 in)2

Armament
• 12 16-inch (406 mm)/50 cal Mark 72 guns
• 20 5-inch (127 mm)/54 cal Mark 162 guns
• 10–40 Bofors 40 mm2 anti-aircraft guns
• 56 Oerlikon 20 mm2 anti-aircraft guns

Propulsion
• 8 Babcock & Wilcox express boilers with 2 drums
• 4 sets of geared steam turbines
Power
• 4 × 43,000 HP (32,065,100 W)2
• total power 172,000 shp (128 MW)
Speed
• 28 ns (52 km/h) maximum2​5​
Autonomy
• 15,000 nmi (27,779.9 km) at 15 ns (27.8 km/h)1

Crew
• Standard: 23552​
aircraft
• 4 Vought OS2U Kingfisher/Curtiss SC Seahawk seaplanes


Last edited by AlexitoBB on July 29th, 2022, 5:01 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
[Profile] [Quote]
emperor_andreas
Post subject: Re: Montana (BB-67) Alternative conceptPosted: July 24th, 2022, 3:34 am
Offline
Posts: 3910
Joined: November 17th, 2010, 8:03 am
Location: Corinth, MS USA
Contact: YouTube
Awesome work! No Louisiana (BB-71) in this AU?

_________________
[ img ]
MS State Guard - 08 March 2014 - 28 January 2023

The Official IJN Ships & Planes List

#FJB


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 1 of 1  [ 9 posts ]  Return to “Personal Designs”

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]