Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 1 of 3  [ 21 posts ]  Go to page 1 2 3 »
Author Message
heuhen
Post subject: To much candy!Posted: May 14th, 2011, 3:43 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 9102
Joined: December 15th, 2010, 10:13 pm
Location: Behind you, looking at you with my mustache!
http://www.combatreform.org/seaplanefighters.htm


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
TimothyC
Post subject: Re: To much candy!Posted: May 14th, 2011, 4:05 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 3765
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:06 am
Contact: Website
Can we ban links to Combat reform?

Mike "Sparky" Sparks is an idiot who unfortunately hasn't been banned from the internet (if ever there was a person to ban, he's up there on the list with child molesters and people who talk at the theater).

_________________
𝐌𝐀𝐓𝐇𝐍𝐄𝐓- 𝑻𝒐 𝑪𝒐𝒈𝒊𝒕𝒂𝒕𝒆 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒕𝒐 𝑺𝒐𝒍𝒗𝒆


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
ALVAMA
Post subject: Re: To much candy!Posted: May 14th, 2011, 4:06 pm
TimothyC wrote:
Can we ban links to Combat reform?

Mike "Sparky" Sparks is an idiot who unfortunately hasn't been banned from the internet (if ever there was a person to ban, he's up there on the list with child molesters and people who talk at the theater).

Hahahaa wait is that the same guy from 9 to 10 months ago on the old board :mrgreen:


Top
[Quote]
Carnac
Post subject: Re: To much candy!Posted: May 15th, 2011, 2:23 am
Offline
Posts: 310
Joined: April 28th, 2011, 11:59 pm
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Quote:
anti-war warfare
wat

_________________
Probably posting from and iPhone and naval terms befuddle it. If I say a ships' hill, you know what I meant.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
klagldsf
Post subject: Re: To much candy!Posted: May 15th, 2011, 3:39 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2765
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 4:14 pm
Carlo Kopp, for all of his failings, will still be miles above this guy.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Thiel
Post subject: Re: To much candy!Posted: May 15th, 2011, 6:54 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 5376
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark
To truly understand the madness, look up his opinion of the M113.
For some reason he think it's the epitome of AFV development, despite the fact that pretty much everyone is getting rid of it has soon as they can afford a replacement.

_________________
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Carthaginian
Post subject: Re: To much candy!Posted: May 15th, 2011, 4:01 pm
Offline
Posts: 587
Joined: July 30th, 2010, 7:25 pm
Location: Daphne, Alabama, C.S.A.
Thiel wrote:
To truly understand the madness, look up his opinion of the M113.
For some reason he think it's the epitome of AFV development, despite the fact that pretty much everyone is getting rid of it has soon as they can afford a replacement.
He is a fan of the Aluminum Box of Death?
Yeah, that shows that he's an idiot.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Gollevainen
Post subject: Re: To much candy!Posted: May 15th, 2011, 4:12 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 4714
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 5:10 am
Location: Finland
Contact: Website
I agree, no sparky in my forums 8-)

also as a general note, don't make thread with idiotic name, just posting a link without any reference to its content.
Now I (and propaply many more) unfortunately made out trafic to his site that just gives that idiot more enthustiasm to stay online.

_________________
Shipbucket mainsite, aka "The Archive"
New AU project "Aravala"


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Thiel
Post subject: Re: To much candy!Posted: May 15th, 2011, 4:14 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 5376
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark
Carthaginian wrote:
Thiel wrote:
To truly understand the madness, look up his opinion of the M113.
For some reason he think it's the epitome of AFV development, despite the fact that pretty much everyone is getting rid of it has soon as they can afford a replacement.
He is a fan of the Aluminum Box of Death?
Yeah, that shows that he's an idiot.
Rabid fanatic is closer, but yeah.

_________________
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
klagldsf
Post subject: Re: To much candy!Posted: May 15th, 2011, 7:31 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2765
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 4:14 pm
Thiel wrote:
For some reason he think it's the epitome of AFV development, despite the fact that pretty much everyone is getting rid of it has soon as they can afford a replacement.
Yeah, it truly is bizarre. For that matter, if it truly is the epitome of AFV development, why would replacements be developed in the first place?

Sparky had some good ideas, and then rapidly fell into madness by believing his own hype in extremes not seen since L. Ron Hubbard. The M113 is an example of this - yes, it's a little more air-portable than similar AFVs, but then he started to really dive off into the hype he himself created for it. And he's honestly the only person who believes it at this point (at least, God hope so).


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 1 of 3  [ 21 posts ]  Return to “Sources and Reference Drawings” | Go to page 1 2 3 »

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]