Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 36 of 46  [ 457 posts ]  Go to page « 134 35 36 37 3846 »
Author Message
heuhen
Post subject: Re: Design forum for "AU" Northern KingdomPosted: May 9th, 2011, 9:24 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 9102
Joined: December 15th, 2010, 10:13 pm
Location: Behind you, looking at you with my mustache!
Blackbuck wrote:
For something that size to only have two Phalanx on it makes me wonder how easy would it be for someone to sink it?
heuhen wrote:
I consider going from two Phalanx to 4. suggestions about location of those.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
heuhen
Post subject: Re: Design forum for "AU" Northern KingdomPosted: May 10th, 2011, 1:10 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 9102
Joined: December 15th, 2010, 10:13 pm
Location: Behind you, looking at you with my mustache!
updated:

Now the armarment is:
1*singel 155mm gun
1*singel 127mm gun
4*MK-41 VLS 64 cell strike length
6*Phalanx block 2
24*NSM
2*twin hull mount TT
and some 27mm and 12,7 mm

suggestions, improvements ... etc.

[ img ]


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
ALVAMA
Post subject: Re: Design forum for "AU" Northern KingdomPosted: May 10th, 2011, 1:13 pm
Awesome!!


Top
[Quote]
TimothyC
Post subject: Re: Design forum for "AU" Northern KingdomPosted: May 10th, 2011, 2:17 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 3765
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:06 am
Contact: Website
Conceptual question: Why did you opt for the current layout of SPY-1 Panels? You will note that other than the Ticonderoga class, all AEGIS ships use arrays that are set 45° off fore-aft-port-starboard.

Edit: NOTE: I'm not saying your design is wrong, I'm just wondering if the hull type was already in service, and then adopted for the AEGIS cruiser roll.

_________________
𝐌𝐀𝐓𝐇𝐍𝐄𝐓- 𝑻𝒐 𝑪𝒐𝒈𝒊𝒕𝒂𝒕𝒆 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒕𝒐 𝑺𝒐𝒍𝒗𝒆


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
heuhen
Post subject: Re: Design forum for "AU" Northern KingdomPosted: May 10th, 2011, 2:53 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 9102
Joined: December 15th, 2010, 10:13 pm
Location: Behind you, looking at you with my mustache!
TimothyC wrote:
Conceptual question: Why did you opt for the current layout of SPY-1 Panels? You will note that other than the Ticonderoga class, all AEGIS ships use arrays that are set 45° off fore-aft-port-starboard.

Edit: NOTE: I'm not saying your design is wrong, I'm just wondering if the hull type was already in service, and then adopted for the AEGIS cruiser roll.
The hull is from an older ship, but since it needed new cruisers quickly as possible, they used the old hull, and to save even more time, they took the layout of Tico ... and further developed it to specific requirements for just this ships!


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
bezobrazov
Post subject: Re: Design forum for "AU" Northern KingdomPosted: May 10th, 2011, 3:29 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 3406
Joined: July 29th, 2010, 2:20 pm
Hmmm...seems rather like a tad overkill with six Phalanx systems, six(?) SPG-51s. I've come to like your design, Heuhen, but I afraid your weight calculations are quite far off. In other words, your design as it is now is not very weight efficient; redundant systems positioned in akward spots taking up much valuable space and weight. Yuo can have four SPG-51s and two Phalanxes, but they need to be placed in much more economical positions. That would be my five cents of advice.

_________________
My Avatar:Петр Алексеевич Безобразов (Petr Alekseevich Bezobrazov), Вице-адмирал , царская ВМФ России(1845-1906) - I sign my drawings as Ari Saarinen


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
swin_lad
Post subject: Re: Design forum for "AU" Northern KingdomPosted: May 10th, 2011, 6:22 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 312
Joined: December 10th, 2010, 2:05 pm
Location: Swindon Town FC, From the West Country
No he as 4 arrays

_________________
Nick

@ashwellkennedy


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
bezobrazov
Post subject: Re: Design forum for "AU" Northern KingdomPosted: May 10th, 2011, 6:28 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 3406
Joined: July 29th, 2010, 2:20 pm
swin_lad, if you're referring to the SPG-51s, please look closer at the deck elevation. Heuhen clearly indicates six units! Configuration is three forward, three aft in one+two arrangement.

_________________
My Avatar:Петр Алексеевич Безобразов (Petr Alekseevich Bezobrazov), Вице-адмирал , царская ВМФ России(1845-1906) - I sign my drawings as Ari Saarinen


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
ALVAMA
Post subject: Re: Design forum for "AU" Northern KingdomPosted: May 10th, 2011, 6:30 pm
yeas 6 may be to many!


Top
[Quote]
TimothyC
Post subject: Re: Design forum for "AU" Northern KingdomPosted: May 10th, 2011, 9:57 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 3765
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:06 am
Contact: Website
bezobrazov wrote:
swin_lad, if you're referring to the SPG-51s, please look closer at the deck elevation. Heuhen clearly indicates six units! Configuration is three forward, three aft in one+two arrangement.
AN/SPG-62. AN/SPG-51 was the old Tartar system, while the AN/SPG-62 is the AEGIS version, and yes there are differences between them (physical as well as electrical).

_________________
𝐌𝐀𝐓𝐇𝐍𝐄𝐓- 𝑻𝒐 𝑪𝒐𝒈𝒊𝒕𝒂𝒕𝒆 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒕𝒐 𝑺𝒐𝒍𝒗𝒆


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 36 of 46  [ 457 posts ]  Return to “Alternate Universe Designs” | Go to page « 134 35 36 37 3846 »

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]