Shipbucket

SURFACE WARFARE FORCE







SUBMARINE FORCE








MINE WARFARE FORCE


FLEET SUPPORT FORCE







HARBOUR SUPPORT FORCE




AMPHIBIOUS WARFARE FORCE





TRAINING SUPPORT FORCE


RESEARCH AND RANGE SUPPORT FORCE



SAR FORCE


CURRENT AIRCRAFT

CURRENT SMALL CRAFT

From a noob to a noob, it's probably better to post one or two ships at a time so that it's easier to have them critiqued and reviewed.

_________________
Probably posting from and iPhone and naval terms befuddle it. If I say a ships' hill, you know what I meant.

Good point my friend...that said what do you think of my additions

A few look out of shipbucket style, particularly the larger ships. Also, some seem a bit cartoonish in some of their dimensions :/

Most of the smaller ships are well done though.

_________________
Probably posting from and iPhone and naval terms befuddle it. If I say a ships' hill, you know what I meant.

just to know, why did you use the v-22 as an awacs? the e2d would be better because the e2d has an longer endurance and a better cruising speed

I got one question, are you the windowman? You defiantly use a lot of those on your carrier/lph

_________________
Fryssian AU with Lt.Maverick 114
viewtopic.php?f=14&t=9802&p=193331#p193331

Embarked on: HNLMS Karel Doorman A833
To do list:
-Zeven Provincien class cruiser
-Joint support ship all sides
-F124 Sachsen class frigate
-F125 Baden-Württemberg class frigate
-Clemencau class aircraft carrier
-Zeven provincien class frigate
-Poolster class AOR
-Amsterdam class AOR
-Minas Gerais aircraft carrier

One thing that confuses me is that you have the F-35 depicted as a twin-engine fighter, when it clearly is not.

XD it's an modified F-18 drawing, while the wing of the F-18 folded is an modified F-35 XD

_________________
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin

Gilles:
just to know, why did you use the v-22 as an awacs? the e2d would be better because the e2d has an longer endurance and a better cruising speed
Reason: Trying to keep amount of different aircraft to minimum to help with maintenance and spares storage. But I do agree with you regarding endurance.
MitcheLL300
I got one question, are you the windowman? You defiantly use a lot of those on your carrier/lph
Response: never really thought about it. first deck is carrier command, second deck fleet command and top is flight control. Anyone else feel I can lower my fixation on windows....lol... either that it could make an awesome floating greenhouse lol

klagldsf & acelanceloet
congrats you are the first to notice that.... I'll fix that

Thanks for your guidance

The aircrafts are in .jpg format,try to repost them in .png