Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 1 of 2  [ 12 posts ]  Go to page 1 2 »
Author Message
Philbob
Post subject: more Royal NavyPosted: April 30th, 2011, 7:05 am
Offline
Posts: 586
Joined: July 30th, 2010, 3:45 am
The corrected CVF (and hopfully final)
http://baesystems.com/BAEProd/groups/pu ... asheet.pdf

a new LHD design
http://baesystems.com/BAEProd/groups/pu ... asheet.pdf

_________________
Supreme Commander of the Astrofleets


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
KimWerner
Post subject: Re: more Royal NavyPosted: April 30th, 2011, 10:16 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2195
Joined: December 22nd, 2010, 12:13 pm
Location: Denmark
Philbob wrote:
Thanks for the url-threads. Very informative and exciting :D If it's possible to find drawings from starboardside it would be two nice challenges to draw in SB ;)

_________________
Work in progress:
DD County Class PNS Babur (1982)(PAK)
FF Type 21 Class D182 PNS Babur (2000)(PAK)
All relevant Coat of Arms


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Portsmouth Bill
Post subject: Re: more Royal NavyPosted: April 30th, 2011, 11:40 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 3220
Joined: August 16th, 2010, 7:45 am
Location: Cambridge United Kingdom
Yes, the latest in the media is that one of them will be redisgned to accept the USN version of the JSF; so, the cost is really taking off now.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
TimothyC
Post subject: Re: more Royal NavyPosted: April 30th, 2011, 4:58 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 3765
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:06 am
Contact: Website
Portsmouth Bill wrote:
Yes, the latest in the media is that one of them will be redisgned to accept the USN version of the JSF; so, the cost is really taking off now.
Both CVFs will be fitted for the F-35C. QE will be built in STOVL config, and PoW will be built as CATOBAR. Following PoW's Commissioning, QE will go back into refit and get converted to CATOBAR mode. This was covered here, when the defense review came out.

_________________
𝐌𝐀𝐓𝐇𝐍𝐄𝐓- 𝑻𝒐 𝑪𝒐𝒈𝒊𝒕𝒂𝒕𝒆 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒕𝒐 𝑺𝒐𝒍𝒗𝒆


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Portsmouth Bill
Post subject: Re: more Royal NavyPosted: April 30th, 2011, 7:10 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 3220
Joined: August 16th, 2010, 7:45 am
Location: Cambridge United Kingdom
http://forum.keypublishing.com/showthread.php?t=92116

http://news.bbc.co.uk/today/hi/today/ne ... 469951.stm


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
TimothyC
Post subject: Re: more Royal NavyPosted: May 1st, 2011, 1:28 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 3765
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:06 am
Contact: Website
Portsmouth Bill wrote:
Welcome to the wonderful world of BAe!

_________________
𝐌𝐀𝐓𝐇𝐍𝐄𝐓- 𝑻𝒐 𝑪𝒐𝒈𝒊𝒕𝒂𝒕𝒆 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒕𝒐 𝑺𝒐𝒍𝒗𝒆


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Portsmouth Bill
Post subject: Re: more Royal NavyPosted: May 1st, 2011, 6:33 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 3220
Joined: August 16th, 2010, 7:45 am
Location: Cambridge United Kingdom
And all the rest! Eisenhower got it right ;)


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
klagldsf
Post subject: Re: more Royal NavyPosted: May 2nd, 2011, 5:01 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2765
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 4:14 pm
The LHD appears to be an Ocean follow-on.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Bombhead
Post subject: Re: more Royal NavyPosted: May 6th, 2011, 4:43 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2299
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 7:41 pm
Alas we Brits have a poor record of cost over runs especially when it comes to carriers.Victorious' 1950-58 re-fit was projected to cost £2.5m the actuall cost came in at £30.5m,more than the price of a new build ship. :(


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Philbob
Post subject: Re: more Royal NavyPosted: May 6th, 2011, 11:39 pm
Offline
Posts: 586
Joined: July 30th, 2010, 3:45 am
to be fair your government made a huge mistake by immediately retiring her after the refit

_________________
Supreme Commander of the Astrofleets


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 1 of 2  [ 12 posts ]  Return to “Sources and Reference Drawings” | Go to page 1 2 »

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]