The usual excellence I've come to expect.
JOHNSTON was one of the "square bridge" FLETCHER class destroyers, which incorporated a revised/simplified open bridge based on British war experience.
While it's certainly true that British experience
went into the bridge revisions, this seems to sort of invert the design process. I am away from a scanner today, but these are some selected quotes from Sumrall's
"Sumner-Gearing-Class Destroyers", which is probably the bible of the latter classes.
My own selection of quote snippets is borne out of laziness, and I'd be happy to scan a few pages to clarify if you think I'm presenting the wrong interpretation.
General Arrangement of the Bridge Area (pp. 49-50)
The arrangement of the bridge was a controversial matter. The design approved by [SECNAV]... was similar to the square-bridge configuration of the modified Fletchers... it was changed to an arrangement referred to as the British-style bridge.
...
In British practice, the conning officer's position was in an open bridge above the pilothouse and helm...
...
Both of the British-style bridge configurations were immediately unpopular with most of the ships' captains...
...
After considerable effort, the draftsmen... created a new bridge. The arrangement was similar to the square bridge of the modified Fletchers...
As I read it, the bridge you've drawn is the quite traditional American approach, without the semi-plated-in upper level for the OOD that the British seemed to prefer.