Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 31 of 46  [ 457 posts ]  Go to page « 129 30 31 32 3346 »
Author Message
acelanceloet
Post subject: Re: Design forum for "AU" Northern KingdomPosted: May 3rd, 2011, 4:59 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 7510
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands
the type A looks quite good, although I don't know if there would be enough space for an NH-90 on the '3' position. the sonar looks somewhat large, but I guess you would use this ship as an ASW mothership. personally I would like an smaller VLS with only ESSM and maybe tomahawk...... but all in all, it looks like an interesting design, which would have done good work in the 'cold war situation' against the USSR subs. the only real thing lacking is some anti-ship missiles.

the type B though, makes absolutely no sense to me, and I would like to know the role you had in mind for it... as I can't think of any.

_________________
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
heuhen
Post subject: Re: Design forum for "AU" Northern KingdomPosted: May 3rd, 2011, 5:07 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 9102
Joined: December 15th, 2010, 10:13 pm
Location: Behind you, looking at you with my mustache!
Thiel wrote:
Why on earth is it armed with a SLBM??
I just put it there as a kind of dirty tricks. (If the enemy is a coward so ...) :lol:


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
heuhen
Post subject: Re: Design forum for "AU" Northern KingdomPosted: May 3rd, 2011, 5:22 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 9102
Joined: December 15th, 2010, 10:13 pm
Location: Behind you, looking at you with my mustache!
Quote:
the type A looks quite good, although I don't know if there would be enough space for an NH-90 on the '3' position
Hm! perhaps Lynx
Quote:
the sonar looks somewhat large, but I guess you would use this ship as an ASW mothership.
Can be one of the properties of her, at the same time she can perform special opperasjon transport.
Quote:
personally I would like an smaller VLS with only ESSM and maybe tomahawk...... but all in all, it looks like an interesting design, which would have done good work in the 'cold war situation' against the USSR subs. the only real thing lacking is some anti-ship missiles.
noted.

do not know what type of anti-missile ships I'll go for yet. The Norwegian or American. to go for a smaller VLS, Then I should have room for a small superstructure with built-in launcher for anti-ship missile.
Quote:
the type B though, makes absolutely no sense to me, and I would like to know the role you had in mind for it... as I can't think of any.
Originally I had thought that it can function as an additional helicopter support for a fleet. But if I equip it with better sonar, so one can use it as a large ASW mother ships, with a very limit troop transport capacity.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
acelanceloet
Post subject: Re: Design forum for "AU" Northern KingdomPosted: May 3rd, 2011, 5:45 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 7510
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands
heuhen wrote:
Quote:
the type A looks quite good, although I don't know if there would be enough space for an NH-90 on the '3' position
Hm! perhaps Lynx
an mixed airwing on an ship like this would be an waste of space to me. you would put OR all lynxes OR all NH90 on board. and it would be an waste of space if your helicopters could not use one of the spots..... simple solution: make an overhang of a few meters at the other side as well, with the structure on it.
heuhen wrote:
Quote:
the sonar looks somewhat large, but I guess you would use this ship as an ASW mothership.
Can be one of the properties of her, at the same time she can perform special opperasjon transport.
for special ops you would need space to host marines.... or you could split the tasks of carrying the landing craft/marines and the helicopters (like the british do with albion and ocean) if you don't want that (I personally would not want that) you need to incorporate space for those.
heuhen wrote:

do not know what type of anti-missile ships I'll go for yet. The Norwegian or American. to go for a smaller VLS, Then I should have room for a small superstructure with built-in launcher for anti-ship missile.
IMHO, go for norwegian. and you have all your weapons at the bow: why not keep them there? space enough.
heuhen wrote:

Quote:
the type B though, makes absolutely no sense to me, and I would like to know the role you had in mind for it... as I can't think of any.
Originally I had thought that it can function as an additional helicopter support for a fleet. But if I equip it with better sonar, so one can use it as a large ASW mother ships, with a very limit troop transport capacity.
sounds good to me... but remove all weapons but the self defensive ones then. it would then do an more or less similar role to the HMS ocean.

_________________
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
heuhen
Post subject: Re: Design forum for "AU" Northern KingdomPosted: May 3rd, 2011, 5:47 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 9102
Joined: December 15th, 2010, 10:13 pm
Location: Behind you, looking at you with my mustache!
Polar class Type C Batch 1

Type A is a kind of ASW mother ship.
Type B (To be) a little larger ASW mother ship with the main task in Special Operations. A task group with the "Type B" will consist of: type B and two Fregate / destroyers.
Type C: mainly an LHC, is specified: the front part of the ship is built up as a Frigate while the aft section is a LHC. The idea will thus be two ships in one. Type C has a kind of a Dirty Tricks in it's weaponary (have not decided that yet, if suggestions ...)

[ img ]


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
acelanceloet
Post subject: Re: Design forum for "AU" Northern KingdomPosted: May 3rd, 2011, 5:54 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 7510
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands
I would make the bridge lower, and would choose an different setup for the weapons. the current setup doesn't really help the helicopter operations.
my idea: make it an 'combat looking LPD' instead of an 'frigate LHD' that would make an setup with bow weapons much easier.

_________________
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
heuhen
Post subject: Re: Design forum for "AU" Northern KingdomPosted: May 3rd, 2011, 5:57 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 9102
Joined: December 15th, 2010, 10:13 pm
Location: Behind you, looking at you with my mustache!
Quote:
an mixed airwing on an ship like this would be an waste of space to me. you would put OR all lynxes OR all NH90 on board. and it would be an waste of space if your helicopters could not use one of the spots..... simple solution: make an overhang of a few meters at the other side as well, with the structure on it.
god idea!

Quote:
for special ops you would need space to host marines.... or you could split the tasks of carrying the landing craft/marines and the helicopters (like the british do with albion and ocean) if you don't want that (I personally would not want that) you need to incorporate space for those.
my idea would be Batch 1 and Batch 2, etc. ..
Quote:
IMHO, go for norwegian. and you have all your weapons at the bow: why not keep them there? space enough.
ok!
Quote:
sounds good to me... but remove all weapons but the self defensive ones then. it would then do an more or less similar role to the HMS ocean.
ESSM og 40mm dardo on the foredeck and 12.7 mm/20mm on the aft deck. Or should I just make it easy and have Ciws on the foredeck and stern.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
heuhen
Post subject: Re: Design forum for "AU" Northern KingdomPosted: May 3rd, 2011, 5:58 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 9102
Joined: December 15th, 2010, 10:13 pm
Location: Behind you, looking at you with my mustache!
acelanceloet wrote:
I would make the bridge lower, and would choose an different setup for the weapons. the current setup doesn't really help the helicopter operations.
my idea: make it an 'combat looking LPD' instead of an 'frigate LHD' that would make an setup with bow weapons much easier.
ok thanks!


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
acelanceloet
Post subject: Re: Design forum for "AU" Northern KingdomPosted: May 3rd, 2011, 6:02 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 7510
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands
heuhen wrote:
ESSM og 40mm dardo on the foredeck and 12.7 mm/20mm on the aft deck. Or should I just make it easy and have Ciws on the foredeck and stern.
that's up to you. most modern LPD's have only CIWS and some self defensive machine guns. you could put ESSM on it as well, but that is not necessary.

_________________
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
heuhen
Post subject: Re: Design forum for "AU" Northern KingdomPosted: May 3rd, 2011, 6:04 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 9102
Joined: December 15th, 2010, 10:13 pm
Location: Behind you, looking at you with my mustache!
acelanceloet wrote:
heuhen wrote:
ESSM og 40mm dardo on the foredeck and 12.7 mm/20mm on the aft deck. Or should I just make it easy and have Ciws on the foredeck and stern.
that's up to you. most modern LPD's have only CIWS and some self defensive machine guns. you could put ESSM on it as well, but that is not necessary.
okey thanks! next update will be tomorrow. ;)


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 31 of 46  [ 457 posts ]  Return to “Alternate Universe Designs” | Go to page « 129 30 31 32 3346 »

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]