Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 1 of 2  [ 16 posts ]  Go to page 1 2 »
Author Message
Armoured man
Post subject: US Navy preliminary designsPosted: July 5th, 2019, 11:02 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 331
Joined: June 7th, 2016, 4:53 pm
this is one of the many North Carolina class preliminary designs drawn drawn up throughout the course of the mid to late 1930s, this particular one scheme C along with scheme B, have always been my favourite out of the bunch.



:general specifications:

Displacement: 36,800 tons standard, 39,2730 full load
Length: 171.82 m (759 ft)
Beam: 32 m (104 ft)
Draft: 10 m (33 ft)
Installed power: (not known)
Speed as built: 30 knots (34 mph; 56 km/h)
2-4x Seaplanes

:Armament:

4 x twin 16"/50 Mark 1
6 x triple 5"/36 Mark 23
4 x quad 1.1"/75 Mark 1

[ img ]
I also chose to depict the ship as if it was commissioned in 1938 which is the reason why it has Mark 38 and Mark 37 directors on it
I may also do more NC preliminary designs in the future at some point

_________________
Work list: 1. various pre-1900 Zipang ships 2. Some protected cruisers and other miscellaneous projects


Last edited by Armoured man on July 6th, 2019, 1:36 pm, edited 3 times in total.

Top
[Profile] [Quote]
BB1987
Post subject: Re: North Carolina preliminary designsPosted: July 5th, 2019, 11:20 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2818
Joined: May 23rd, 2012, 1:01 pm
Location: Rome - Italy
Wonky looking preliminary, but wery well executed drawing.

_________________
My Worklist
Sources and documentations are the most welcome.

-Koko Kyouwakoku (Republic of Koko)
-Koko's carrier-based aircrafts of WWII
-Koko Kaiun Yuso Kaisha - KoKaYu Line (Koko AU spinoff)
-Koko - Civil Aviation


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Armoured man
Post subject: Re: North Carolina preliminary designsPosted: July 5th, 2019, 11:24 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 331
Joined: June 7th, 2016, 4:53 pm
thanks, and yeah she definitely is weird to look at but compared to some of the other NC preliminaries she looks practically normal by comparison :?

_________________
Work list: 1. various pre-1900 Zipang ships 2. Some protected cruisers and other miscellaneous projects


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Rainmaker
Post subject: Re: North Carolina preliminary designsPosted: July 5th, 2019, 12:39 pm
Offline
Posts: 247
Joined: August 2nd, 2010, 6:12 pm
Location: Montreal, QC
Very interesting. American warships of this era tend to have their own distinctive appearance, but this concept appears to have a great deal of British influence in its characteristics. Lovely drawing as well.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
emperor_andreas
Post subject: Re: North Carolina preliminary designsPosted: July 5th, 2019, 12:51 pm
Offline
Posts: 3910
Joined: November 17th, 2010, 8:03 am
Location: Corinth, MS USA
Contact: YouTube
Kinda has a Nelson-esque feel to her...nice work!

_________________
[ img ]
MS State Guard - 08 March 2014 - 28 January 2023

The Official IJN Ships & Planes List

#FJB


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Armoured man
Post subject: Re: North Carolina preliminary designsPosted: July 5th, 2019, 1:26 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 331
Joined: June 7th, 2016, 4:53 pm
thanks she wasn't the easiest to draw, considering that some aspects like ventilation was completely missing from the original plan, so using a bit of common Sense and judging where the boiler rooms were and using the original plan, I had to make a educated guess on the where the ventilation would have been if she had ever progressed to a more finalised design state

_________________
Work list: 1. various pre-1900 Zipang ships 2. Some protected cruisers and other miscellaneous projects


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Tempest
Post subject: Re: North Carolina preliminary designsPosted: July 5th, 2019, 2:03 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 751
Joined: October 21st, 2013, 10:44 am
Location: Wales
Lovely drawing. Like the other guys, as soon as I saw her I thought "very Nelsonesque". She does have a G3 (I think) preliminary feel to her.

_________________
My Worklist
MD Scale, 4 Pixels : 1 Foot
Official German Parts Sheet
German Capital Ship Projects of The First World War


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Armoured man
Post subject: Re: North Carolina preliminary designsPosted: July 5th, 2019, 2:19 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 331
Joined: June 7th, 2016, 4:53 pm
thanks, I am considering doing some of the more unique North Carolina preliminaries, particularly scheme F has caught my interest, based on how hideous it looks and the fact that it's a really weird concept for a battleship.

_________________
Work list: 1. various pre-1900 Zipang ships 2. Some protected cruisers and other miscellaneous projects


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
acelanceloet
Post subject: Re: North Carolina preliminary designsPosted: July 5th, 2019, 4:09 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 7510
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands
Pretty nice!

I have a few minor comments though.....
- I suspect part of the hull would have an skeg, so the part under the forwards propeller shaft should not be uniformly dark shaded IMO
- I might be wrong, but I would suspect a tiny bit of shading under a bow that extreme
- under the #4 main gun turret, the hard edge there would have been shaped like that on the bulkheads, but there would be an rounded section there to avoid stresses in the structure, I think?

Btw, where were the boiler and turbine rooms situated on this design? looks like the turbines might have been forwards from the boiler rooms, which would suggest long and low shafts, but I might be wrong about that.....

_________________
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Colombamike
Post subject: Re: North Carolina preliminary designsPosted: July 5th, 2019, 5:37 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 1359
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 6:18 am
Location: France, Marseille
acelanceloet wrote: *
Btw, where were the boiler and turbine rooms situated on this design?
looks like the turbines might have been forwards from the boiler rooms, which would suggest long and low shafts, but I might be wrong about that.....
[ img ]


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 1 of 2  [ 16 posts ]  Return to “Never-Built Designs” | Go to page 1 2 »

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]