Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 2 of 3  [ 27 posts ]  Go to page « 1 2 3 »
Author Message
Ro-Po Max
Post subject: Re: Destroyer Type 45 (Daring class)Posted: December 4th, 2018, 9:47 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 961
Joined: May 1st, 2017, 8:35 am
Location: ARCC
Contact: Website
emperor_andreas wrote: *
VERY nice work!
Thanx my Friend ;) :)

_________________
More here:viewtopic.php?f=14&t=8292


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Ro-Po Max
Post subject: Re: Destroyer Type 45 (Daring class)Posted: December 4th, 2018, 9:50 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 961
Joined: May 1st, 2017, 8:35 am
Location: ARCC
Contact: Website
Thank you so much Mist ... your advice for improvement is very valuable. This is exactly what I need.

_________________
More here:viewtopic.php?f=14&t=8292


Last edited by Ro-Po Max on December 5th, 2018, 9:01 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Hood
Post subject: Re: Destroyer Type 45 (Daring class)Posted: December 5th, 2018, 8:52 am
Offline
Posts: 7233
Joined: July 31st, 2010, 10:07 am
Wonderful work Ro-Po.
I know these have been drawn many times now, but this is perhaps artistically the most advanced drawings we've had.

_________________
Hood's Worklist
English Electric Canberra FD
Interwar RN Capital Ships
Super-Darings
Never-Were British Aircraft


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
MihoshiK
Post subject: Re: Destroyer Type 45 (Daring class)Posted: December 5th, 2018, 11:02 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 1035
Joined: October 16th, 2010, 11:06 pm
Location: In orbit, watching you draw.
Contact: Website
The SAMPSON array is, sorry to say it, wrong. From the side the radar faces and their covers are straight, not curved. The lower array, incidentally, being the correct size.

[ img ]

And we have standard parts for the cannons, the harpoon and the S1850M radar for a reason...

If you wish to submit new parts, then do so, but please don't be special just because you can. That's literally not what shipbucket is about.
Hood wrote: *
Wonderful work Ro-Po.
I know these have been drawn many times now, but this is perhaps artistically the most advanced drawings we've had.
Well yes. And it was pointed out earlier this year that perhaps it would be better if people didn't do that. Literally earlier this year Waterwings redrew the whole thing.
http://shipbucket.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=12&t=6360

"Just because it looks nice" shouldn't be sufficient reason to redo perfectly good drawings time and time again.

_________________
Would you please not eat my gun...
[ img ]


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Ro-Po Max
Post subject: Re: Destroyer Type 45 (Daring class)Posted: December 5th, 2018, 11:19 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 961
Joined: May 1st, 2017, 8:35 am
Location: ARCC
Contact: Website
Everyone knows ... all parts, I do myself. But thanks for the remark (radar).

_________________
More here:viewtopic.php?f=14&t=8292


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Ro-Po Max
Post subject: Re: Destroyer Type 45 (Daring class)Posted: December 5th, 2018, 11:23 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 961
Joined: May 1st, 2017, 8:35 am
Location: ARCC
Contact: Website
I draw what I like ... and dozens of good ships just can't be here (they are already drawn). Maybe I'll show in new topic.

_________________
More here:viewtopic.php?f=14&t=8292


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
erik_t
Post subject: Re: Destroyer Type 45 (Daring class)Posted: December 5th, 2018, 2:32 pm
Offline
Posts: 2936
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 11:38 pm
Location: Midwest US
MihoshiK wrote: *
"Just because it looks nice" shouldn't be sufficient reason to redo perfectly good drawings time and time again.
On the other hand, "that's already been drawn, so you don't get to draw it later for yourself" is by far my least favorite idea I see regularly expressed here.

If somebody really likes T45, or whatever, and wants to draw it in this style on their own time, I'd personally like to see what they produce.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Colosseum
Post subject: Re: Destroyer Type 45 (Daring class)Posted: December 5th, 2018, 2:50 pm
Offline
Posts: 5218
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 9:38 pm
Location: Austin, TX
Contact: Website
Yes... there is no rule that says you can't redraw a certain ship dozens of times ;)

_________________
USN components, camouflage colors, & reference links (World War II only)


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
adenandy
Post subject: Re: Destroyer Type 45 (Daring class)Posted: December 5th, 2018, 10:58 pm
Offline
Posts: 1630
Joined: July 23rd, 2011, 1:46 am
Fantastic programme on BBC1 at the moment following HMS Duncan on her last deployment in the Black Sea and the Mediterranean, where the camera crew pretty much has access all areas.

_________________
https://discord.gg/5PHq8Dk
My artwork is posted here: https://www.deviantart.com/adenandy/gallery/all


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Hood
Post subject: Re: Destroyer Type 45 (Daring class)Posted: December 6th, 2018, 9:08 am
Offline
Posts: 7233
Joined: July 31st, 2010, 10:07 am
MihoshiK wrote: *
And we have standard parts for the cannons, the harpoon and the S1850M radar for a reason...
I have to say, I think we have come a long way from the origins of Shipbucket. Sure, the common parts we have ease drawing and make standardisation across drawings much easier to give the shipbucket 'feel', but a lot of artists are producing quite sophisticated art now with shading and detailing we never dreamed of a decade ago.

Trying to make some parts fit the advanced shading techniques and style some advanced artists like Ro-Po are using would require them to heavily recolour and modify them anyway otherwise the parts would stand out like a sore thumb.

I don't think kitbashing the latest drawings is feasible any more, you could take a 2006 MConrads drawing and mash it up or modify it pretty easily*. Trying to kitbash a latest Garlicdesign cruiser or Ro-Po Type 45 is going to take so long you might as well draw a completely fictional design from scratch. interestingly if you see Shipbucket mash-ups on the internet, they are almost always the older drawings with the garish red hulls and hideous stock propellers.

_________________
Hood's Worklist
English Electric Canberra FD
Interwar RN Capital Ships
Super-Darings
Never-Were British Aircraft


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 2 of 3  [ 27 posts ]  Return to “Real Designs” | Go to page « 1 2 3 »

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 31 guests


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]