Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 1 of 3  [ 24 posts ]  Go to page 1 2 3 »
Author Message
jabba
Post subject: HMS AntelopePosted: April 19th, 2011, 4:24 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 1012
Joined: April 14th, 2011, 5:00 pm
Location: Under your kitchen sink...
'A Class' Destroyer, comm. 1930

Hopefully an improvement from my earlier work...

-Attachment removed, see below -

_________________
[ img ]
Jabba's Worklist


Last edited by jabba on April 19th, 2011, 11:51 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
[Profile] [Quote]
ALVAMA
Post subject: Re: HMS AntelopePosted: April 19th, 2011, 5:03 am
Yea. A small note is that we always use ''port hols'' with 4x blue pixel, not one, since this is a large ship!


Top
[Quote]
bezobrazov
Post subject: Re: HMS AntelopePosted: April 19th, 2011, 10:59 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 3406
Joined: July 29th, 2010, 2:20 pm
... though in this case the ship isn't that large, as not to benefit form Jabba's solution. Comparing photos and Jabba's drawing I can clearly see why he choose this solution. I am, however, a tad confounded by the size of the name at the stern. Should the letters be of such a significant size? Otherwise a very delightful product, which in my opinion clearly qualifies to be moved to Real Designs!

_________________
My Avatar:Петр Алексеевич Безобразов (Petr Alekseevich Bezobrazov), Вице-адмирал , царская ВМФ России(1845-1906) - I sign my drawings as Ari Saarinen


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
ALVAMA
Post subject: Re: HMS AntelopePosted: April 19th, 2011, 11:08 am
It are rules..


Top
[Quote]
Gollevainen
Post subject: Re: HMS AntelopePosted: April 19th, 2011, 11:19 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 4714
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 5:10 am
Location: Finland
Contact: Website
Quote:
... though in this case the ship isn't that large, as not to benefit form Jabba's solution. Comparing photos and Jabba's drawing I can clearly see why he choose this solution. I am, however, a tad confounded by the size of the name at the stern. Should the letters be of such a significant size? Otherwise a very delightful product, which in my opinion clearly qualifies to be moved to Real Designs!
Unless you are drawing motorboats of less than 30 meters, the portholes should always be uniform as Alavama descriped. This has nothing to do with most aqurate presentation of their relative size, but it comes down to very basics of Shipbucket style as pixel-art. There needs to be some level of exageration over detail sizes.

As what comes to the drawing there is still LOT to do. if we start from the Basics:
The mast....overlapsing black pixels are no-no in basicly every case.
Ordanance... An USN K-gun? Mk IX 4.7' mounts? American TTs? A strange AA gun that penetrates into the TTs? (is there a removed middle tube that allows the gun mount in :roll: )

_________________
Shipbucket mainsite, aka "The Archive"
New AU project "Aravala"


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
jabba
Post subject: Re: HMS AntelopePosted: April 19th, 2011, 12:09 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 1012
Joined: April 14th, 2011, 5:00 pm
Location: Under your kitchen sink...
Got the wrong Mk IX when looking at the part sheets.

Thought that was an AA gun beside the TT looking at the drawing, but on more detailed research, found that it is a quadruple TT and no gun belongs there! :roll: It appears to be something else...

The TTs', however, are to be found on a GB part sheet viewtopic.php?f=16&t=65 Is this incorrect? Should I draw my own TTs?

Oops with the K-gun...

Thanks for spotting all of that :oops:!

Yeah, the hull lettering was massive, so I've changed.
All portholes now standard size.

- Newer attachment below -

_________________
[ img ]
Jabba's Worklist


Last edited by jabba on April 19th, 2011, 1:38 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Gollevainen
Post subject: Re: HMS AntelopePosted: April 19th, 2011, 1:23 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 4714
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 5:10 am
Location: Finland
Contact: Website
The mast should be three pixels width, not two (nothing is two pixel width except 3-4 inch gun barrels).

ok, now I think next phase would be the funnel coolin pipes, you should look for example how they are drawn in other ships from this era from the archive.

_________________
Shipbucket mainsite, aka "The Archive"
New AU project "Aravala"


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
ALVAMA
Post subject: Re: HMS AntelopePosted: April 19th, 2011, 1:30 pm
http://shipbucket.com/images.php?dir=Re ... na1940.png The same class?


Top
[Quote]
jabba
Post subject: Re: HMS AntelopePosted: April 19th, 2011, 1:37 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 1012
Joined: April 14th, 2011, 5:00 pm
Location: Under your kitchen sink...
- Attachment deleted, see next page -

_________________
[ img ]
Jabba's Worklist


Last edited by jabba on April 20th, 2011, 5:33 pm, edited 2 times in total.

Top
[Profile] [Quote]
jabba
Post subject: Re: HMS AntelopePosted: April 19th, 2011, 1:58 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 1012
Joined: April 14th, 2011, 5:00 pm
Location: Under your kitchen sink...
ALVAMA wrote:
The Canadian 'River' class destroyers were a collection of British destroyers. They had two A class made for them (HMCS Skeena being one of them)

So yes, basically (I think)

_________________
[ img ]
Jabba's Worklist


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 1 of 3  [ 24 posts ]  Return to “Beginners Only” | Go to page 1 2 3 »

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]