Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 1 of 5  [ 42 posts ]  Go to page 1 2 3 4 5 »
Author Message
paul_541
Post subject: USS New Jersey 1983 & Iowa classPosted: April 1st, 2011, 1:55 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 395
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 2:58 pm
Location: Quebec, Canada
Hello guys ! :D :)
After a long time, I finally share to you my final drawing of the USS New Jersey BB-62 after is 1980's refit:
[ img ]
Comments and references for ameliorate this drawing are welcome. ;) :shock:

Thanks in advance and greetings. ;)

_________________
My motto:Per ardua ad astra (RCAF)
Current Drawings:
USS Midway CVB-41 and later alterations
HMCS Bonaventure CVL-22 and later alterations
Paul 2024


Last edited by paul_541 on April 2nd, 2011, 3:29 pm, edited 2 times in total.

Top
[Profile] [Quote]
TimothyC
Post subject: Re: USS New Jersey 1983 & Iowa classPosted: April 1st, 2011, 2:43 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 3765
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:06 am
Contact: Website
Phalanx need to be pointed fore and aft. It does look good.

_________________
𝐌𝐀𝐓𝐇𝐍𝐄𝐓- 𝑻𝒐 𝑪𝒐𝒈𝒊𝒕𝒂𝒕𝒆 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒕𝒐 𝑺𝒐𝒍𝒗𝒆


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
darthpanda
Post subject: Re: USS New Jersey 1983 & Iowa classPosted: April 1st, 2011, 3:35 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 3429
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 2:14 pm
Location: HOLLAND!!!!!!!
Contact: Website
and remove the sonar hanging under the seahawk, I believe seahawk at that time also have another colour scheme. REALLY Great job!

_________________
Worklist:
- Victorian Navy - LINK
- ROC/Taiwan - 中華民國空軍 / 陸軍航特部 / 海軍航空兵 - LINK
- RHKAAF / HKGFS - 皇家香港輔助空軍 / 政府飛行服務隊
- Gunbucket - LINK

天滅中共全黨死清光!


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
paul_541
Post subject: Re: USS New Jersey 1983 & Iowa classPosted: April 1st, 2011, 4:04 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 395
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 2:58 pm
Location: Quebec, Canada
darthpanda wrote:
and remove the sonar hanging under the seahawk, I believe seahawk at that time also have another colour scheme. REALLY Great job!
What paint scheme ? :?

Greetings. ;)

_________________
My motto:Per ardua ad astra (RCAF)
Current Drawings:
USS Midway CVB-41 and later alterations
HMCS Bonaventure CVL-22 and later alterations
Paul 2024


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Bombhead
Post subject: Re: USS New Jersey 1983 & Iowa classPosted: April 1st, 2011, 4:26 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2299
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 7:41 pm
A superb drawing Paul,well worth the wait. :P


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
erik_t
Post subject: Re: USS New Jersey 1983 & Iowa classPosted: April 1st, 2011, 10:13 pm
Offline
Posts: 2936
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 11:38 pm
Location: Midwest US
Fantastic! I'd been waiting for this.

I would, however, encourage you to use the standard SPS-49 drawing.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
bezobrazov
Post subject: Re: USS New Jersey 1983 & Iowa classPosted: April 1st, 2011, 11:08 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 3406
Joined: July 29th, 2010, 2:20 pm
Really, really good! However, I do not agree with either Tim or Erik about the phalanx and the SPS-49. First of all, on the Iowas, the '0'-position of the four phalanx-systems were athwardship, i e barrels pointing towards either beam - not fore-and-aft. Since we do have on the parts sheets a variant that suits the correct arrangement of the weapons installation, then it should be encouraged, rather than discouraged to position them the correct way! In other words: they need not be pointed fore-and-aft! Having the as TimothyC suggests will make the drawing erronenous! About the SPS-49, I believe this variant should replace the old, rather bland one. I know for sure that I'm going to use paul's variant on my own (saved) sb-pictures. It's so much more acutely detailed and much closer to the real thing!

_________________
My Avatar:Петр Алексеевич Безобразов (Petr Alekseevich Bezobrazov), Вице-адмирал , царская ВМФ России(1845-1906) - I sign my drawings as Ari Saarinen


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
paul_541
Post subject: Re: USS New Jersey 1983 & Iowa classPosted: April 1st, 2011, 11:55 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 395
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 2:58 pm
Location: Quebec, Canada
bezobrazov wrote:
Really, really good! However, I do not agree with either Tim or Erik about the phalanx and the SPS-49. First of all, on the Iowas, the '0'-position of the four phalanx-systems were athwardship, i e barrels pointing towards either beam - not fore-and-aft. Since we do have on the parts sheets a variant that suits the correct arrangement of the weapons installation, then it should be encouraged, rather than discouraged to position them the correct way! In other words: they need not be pointed fore-and-aft! Having the as TimothyC suggests will make the drawing erronenous! About the SPS-49, I believe this variant should replace the old, rather bland one. I know for sure that I'm going to use paul's variant on my own (saved) sb-pictures. It's so much more acutely detailed and much closer to the real thing!
Thanks ! I think that the SPS-49 must be updated, the old look weird... :? ;)

Greetings. ;)

_________________
My motto:Per ardua ad astra (RCAF)
Current Drawings:
USS Midway CVB-41 and later alterations
HMCS Bonaventure CVL-22 and later alterations
Paul 2024


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
TimothyC
Post subject: Re: USS New Jersey 1983 & Iowa classPosted: April 2nd, 2011, 12:04 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 3765
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:06 am
Contact: Website
bezobrazov wrote:
Really, really good! However, I do not agree with either Tim or Erik about the phalanx and the SPS-49. First of all, on the Iowas, the '0'-position of the four phalanx-systems were athwardship, i e barrels pointing towards either beam - not fore-and-aft. Since we do have on the parts sheets a variant that suits the correct arrangement of the weapons installation, then it should be encouraged, rather than discouraged to position them the correct way! In other words: they need not be pointed fore-and-aft! Having the as TimothyC suggests will make the drawing erroneous!
Except The zero position isn't the standard. The standard is fore-and-aft, unless such set up isn't physically possible (which it is on the Iowas). I'd also point out that the outward facing Phalanxes have not been approved as official versions as of yet.

_________________
𝐌𝐀𝐓𝐇𝐍𝐄𝐓- 𝑻𝒐 𝑪𝒐𝒈𝒊𝒕𝒂𝒕𝒆 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒕𝒐 𝑺𝒐𝒍𝒗𝒆


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
paul_541
Post subject: Re: USS New Jersey 1983 & Iowa classPosted: April 2nd, 2011, 1:27 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 395
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 2:58 pm
Location: Quebec, Canada
TimothyC wrote:
Except The zero position isn't the standard. The standard is fore-and-aft, unless such set up isn't physically possible (which it is on the Iowas). I'd also point out that the outward facing Phalanx have not been approved as official versions as of yet.
[ img ]


As you can see, the position of the phalanx on board of the NJ is their default positions.
My new phalanxs are also in the updated CIWS part sheets in the forum but not yet in the main site... :roll: :)

I dont know if they are approved but they seen more good than the old... No ?
:?

Thanks for your comprehension and greetings. ;)

_________________
My motto:Per ardua ad astra (RCAF)
Current Drawings:
USS Midway CVB-41 and later alterations
HMCS Bonaventure CVL-22 and later alterations
Paul 2024


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 1 of 5  [ 42 posts ]  Return to “Real Designs” | Go to page 1 2 3 4 5 »

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 40 guests


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]