Shipbucket

Great work on those Caravans.
Nice to se some small planes for a change after we've monopolized the thread with 60+ meter twinjets for days

_________________
My Worklist
Sources and documentations are the most welcome.

-Koko Kyouwakoku (Republic of Koko)
-Koko's carrier-based aircrafts of WWII
-Koko Kaiun Yuso Kaisha - KoKaYu Line (Koko AU spinoff)
-Koko - Civil Aviation

Very nice additions and updates from everyone.

_________________
Hood's Worklist
English Electric Canberra FD
Interwar RN Capital Ships
Super-Darings
Never-Were British Aircraft

Nice additions.
(though I'm not sure what was the point in changing some details on blank Caravans, but maybe it's just me )

The only model I could see was a passenger C208B with optional cargo pod. I have included the short-bodied Caravan, the short-bodied freighter, the short-bodied amphibian, the C208B freighter and the C208B amphibian. So we had only 1 model, and I've added another 5 to make a complete (as of current designs) family group.
And some minor corrections (eg; radar pod added, cargo pod doors are not on the starboard side) included as I remade the extra models.
Justified I think.

Oh, these changes are fully justified.
But You've also extended passenger door 1 pixel towards bottom (which created "double black line" I originally tried to avoid), changed shape of cockpit door (which now has the diagonal part looking S-shaped), changed the look of hinges on engine covers and shape of exhaust (together with bottom part of the engine contour).

Just busy completing Caravan colour schemes at the moment.
I also don't like that door double black, but it's closer to reality than leaving the extra blank pixel. The hinges are as I've drawn them - the standard push-lock catches - not as originally drawn. The exhaust extends aft from the original drawing as I've redrawn it.
Unfortunately reality sometimes doesn't scale to pretty at FD.

Re: extra pixel below the door - I did it deliberately.
Re: hinges - arguably yes, but it's down to artistic interpretation.
Re: exhausts - I'd argue:

Your photo shows the exhaust extending rearwards, as was not shown in the original drawing, and is also the exhaust is not as thin as in original drawing.
If you're gonna argue for a full pixel gap there for a sagging exhaust ... as you say that's artistic interpretation.

Lol, as You wish. I just remain unconvinced.

Having never done this before, how would I go about getting the A350 refreshes included in the Master List?

_________________
Fasismi? Ei! Natsismin? Ei! Kommunismi? Ei! Elostelu!