» »

Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 95 of 145  [ 1450 posts ]  Go to page « 1 … 93 94 95 96 97 … 145 »
[Print view]
Author Message
odysseus1980
Post subject: Re: FD scale vehicle/aircraft request threadPosted: January 4th, 2017, 12:07 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 3607
Joined: November 8th, 2010, 8:53 am
Location: Athens,Hellenic Kingdom
Contact: Website
Will take a look. But we do not have the Unipowers, Glaciefire used his own vehicles for the BR90.
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
GLACIESFIRE
Post subject: Re: FD scale vehicle/aircraft request threadPosted: January 4th, 2017, 2:12 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 663
Joined: November 1st, 2010, 2:17 pm
Location: Back in Italy...
https://www.dropbox.com/s/uhcfww5xb9bc6 ... t.png?dl=0

This is what I took out from some littlebird's papers. Right now my AU army is under a major rework for a future upload...

_________________
Welcome to my Kingdom!!!
( http://shipbucket.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=14&t=8293 )
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
odysseus1980
Post subject: Re: FD scale vehicle/aircraft request threadPosted: January 4th, 2017, 3:21 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 3607
Joined: November 8th, 2010, 8:53 am
Location: Athens,Hellenic Kingdom
Contact: Website
Exactly what I was referring in above pm.
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
danricco
Post subject: Re: FD scale vehicle/aircraft request threadPosted: January 4th, 2017, 2:45 pm
Offline
Posts: 58
Joined: December 29th, 2014, 3:34 am
Some modern japanese trucks would be very nice
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Wikipedia & Universe
Post subject: Re: FD scale vehicle/aircraft request threadPosted: January 28th, 2017, 11:57 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 309
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:19 am
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Contact: Website
I'm just noticing that at least some parts of the current A350 drawing may be out of scale. For instance, when I compared it to the Boeing 777 drawings with the GE90 engine, the RR Trent XWB pod dwarfed the GE90 pod, even though the GE90 is larger. I'm going to take another look when I'm not on a phone, but we may want to consider revising that drawing.

_________________
Fasismi? Ei! Natsismin? Ei! Kommunismi? Ei! Elostelu!
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
BB1987
Post subject: Re: FD scale vehicle/aircraft request threadPosted: January 28th, 2017, 12:45 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2818
Joined: May 23rd, 2012, 1:01 pm
Location: Rome - Italy
Wikipedia & Universe wrote:
I'm just noticing that at least some parts of the current A350 drawing may be out of scale. For instance, when I compared it to the Boeing 777 drawings with the GE90 engine, the RR Trent XWB pod dwarfed the GE90 pod, even though the GE90 is larger. I'm going to take another look when I'm not on a phone, but we may want to consider revising that drawing.
The 350 is scaled almost correctly (the -900 should be 1.476 pixels long, the drawing is currently 1.478, and the fuselage diameter matches the supposed 135 pixels), but it has been drawn when the plane had not flew yet and used a preliminary source (this one I suppose) . The actual plane turned out looking different here and there, especially in the tail area. The engine pod is too big as well.

I thought the drawing would benefit from a refresh, but I still fail to find decent sources. This schematic is more up to date, but I believe still inaccurate. I'm not sold with the nose section, the engine still looks too big and detailing is lacking severly below the wing.

_________________
My Worklist
Sources and documentations are the most welcome.

-Koko Kyouwakoku (Republic of Koko)
-Koko's carrier-based aircrafts of WWII
-Koko Kaiun Yuso Kaisha - KoKaYu Line (Koko AU spinoff)
-Koko - Civil Aviation
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Wikipedia & Universe
Post subject: Re: FD scale vehicle/aircraft request threadPosted: January 28th, 2017, 7:43 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 309
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:19 am
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Contact: Website
BB1987 wrote:
Wikipedia & Universe wrote:
I'm just noticing that at least some parts of the current A350 drawing may be out of scale. For instance, when I compared it to the Boeing 777 drawings with the GE90 engine, the RR Trent XWB pod dwarfed the GE90 pod, even though the GE90 is larger. I'm going to take another look when I'm not on a phone, but we may want to consider revising that drawing.
The 350 is scaled almost correctly (the -900 should be 1.476 pixels long, the drawing is currently 1.478, and the fuselage diameter matches the supposed 135 pixels), but it has been drawn when the plane had not flew yet and used a preliminary source (this one I suppose) . The actual plane turned out looking different here and there, especially in the tail area. The engine pod is too big as well.

I thought the drawing would benefit from a refresh, but I still fail to find decent sources. This schematic is more up to date, but I believe still inaccurate. I'm not sold with the nose section, the engine still looks too big and detailing is lacking severly below the wing.
Ah, I see. I was looking to do an AU livery with the A350, but then looking at the A350 alongside some A330, A340, and B777 drawings alerted me that something wasn't quite right.

_________________
Fasismi? Ei! Natsismin? Ei! Kommunismi? Ei! Elostelu!
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
TimothyC
Post subject: Re: FD scale vehicle/aircraft request threadPosted: January 29th, 2017, 1:06 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 3765
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:06 am
Contact: Website
BB1987 wrote:
Wikipedia & Universe wrote:
I'm just noticing that at least some parts of the current A350 drawing may be out of scale. For instance, when I compared it to the Boeing 777 drawings with the GE90 engine, the RR Trent XWB pod dwarfed the GE90 pod, even though the GE90 is larger. I'm going to take another look when I'm not on a phone, but we may want to consider revising that drawing.
The 350 is scaled almost correctly (the -900 should be 1.476 pixels long, the drawing is currently 1.478, and the fuselage diameter matches the supposed 135 pixels), but it has been drawn when the plane had not flew yet and used a preliminary source (this one I suppose) . The actual plane turned out looking different here and there, especially in the tail area. The engine pod is too big as well.

I thought the drawing would benefit from a refresh, but I still fail to find decent sources. This schematic is more up to date, but I believe still inaccurate. I'm not sold with the nose section, the engine still looks too big and detailing is lacking severly below the wing.
Panel lines and such will have to come from pictures, but the best place to go is the Airport Planer's Guide.

_________________
𝐌𝐀𝐓𝐇𝐍𝐄𝐓- 𝑻𝒐 𝑪𝒐𝒈𝒊𝒕𝒂𝒕𝒆 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒕𝒐 𝑺𝒐𝒍𝒗𝒆
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
odysseus1980
Post subject: Re: FD scale vehicle/aircraft request threadPosted: February 12th, 2017, 3:52 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 3607
Joined: November 8th, 2010, 8:53 am
Location: Athens,Hellenic Kingdom
Contact: Website
Unipower M-series family included the 8x8 platform (as ordered by real life Britain for BR90 bridge system), a PLS derivative (probably a follow on from DROPS system), the heavy tank transporters MH-6600 (6x6) and MH-8875 (8x8), a medium tractor (a normal Unipower 8x8 tractor, perhaps equivalent with US M983) a fuel tanker and finally a lengthened 12x8 chassis. I would like to see these in FD-scale. Also many fire engines Unipower-Carmichael were built.
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
GLACIESFIRE
Post subject: Re: FD scale vehicle/aircraft request threadPosted: February 21st, 2017, 12:47 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 663
Joined: November 1st, 2010, 2:17 pm
Location: Back in Italy...
Does anyone have the Bvs210 Viking? Also a good side view is appreciated! ;-)

_________________
Welcome to my Kingdom!!!
( http://shipbucket.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=14&t=8293 )
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 95 of 145  [ 1450 posts ]  Return to “FD Scale Drawings” | Go to page « 1 … 93 94 95 96 97 … 145 »

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests

The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]