Shipbucket

SUBMARINES

SSK 1OO

Submarine looks too short, and squat. Comparing the hull to the conning tower and they look right.

_________________
Thank you Kim for the crest

"Never fear to try on something new. Remember that the Titanic was built by professionals, and the Ark by an amateur"

All own work?

Submarine
SSK 100 - Air Independent Diesel Attack Submarine

HARBOUR SUPPORT

ATF 760 LARGE HARBOUR TUGBOAT


YTB 980 HARBOUR TUGBOAT


YFB 230 HARBOUR TENDER


YTR 790 RANGE SUPPORT VESSEL

Now that I have a core well rounded and in depth fleet I like to start an AU that would see my fleet being used say in the following scenario's

1- Treaty Obligation: NATO deployment to support an maritime sanction operation with other allies.
2 - Arctic Cold Front: Arctic Ocean dispute that begins with unannounced passage of a foreign country naval forces in support of there claim to Arctic territory. And using the fleet available to my AU Canada how it would support and enforce any government reaction to this incursion.
3 - Reactionary Attack: Due to Canada's support for the war against terrorism, a rogue maritime nation that supports and harbours terrorist uses its small but deadly force of SSK to run and hide blockade of the Canadian west coast. And using the fleet available to my AU Canada how it would support and enforce any government reaction to this attack by a nation.
4- Because of depleted world oil supplies, AU Canada with its Oil sands and Arctic oil fields become a major exporter of oil, thus it must build a strong merchant fleet and a stronger naval force to protect its merchant fleet world wide.


I would like for any guidance or advice or even better a "foe" that would be interested in putting their fleet up against mine in one of these scenarios.

AIRCRAFT CARRIER

CV 630 STOVL Carrier

Generally rather fond of some of the desgins you got here, just have a sticking point on the listings of bases and their assigned ships. As someone who lives in St. John's, I can tell you right off the bat, there's no way that all those ships would fit. As nice a harbour as it is, it is actually relatively small...really a puddle compared to ports like Halifax or Montreal (believe I read somewhere that Halifax is between 6-8 times the size). If you kicked out the civilian fishing boats, transports, and merchantmen..and tied some of the ships up side-by-side you might be able to squeeze them all in...but then I'm picturing a modern Taranto or Pearl Harbour...but without the Mediterranean or palm trees.

If you want to keep them, I suggest moving them to Argentia on the southern Avalon where the Yanks had a naval base that should be able to accomodate most of these ships, or just trim it back a bit.

Otherwise, like I said, digging the ships on the whole. Good work. Look forward to seeing the carrier.

Yes as I began to read your message that is the first thought I had. I will do that

SSGN 150 Cruise Missile Submarine