Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 2 of 3  [ 29 posts ]  Go to page « 1 2 3 »
Author Message
acelanceloet
Post subject: Re: No Fly ZonePosted: March 19th, 2011, 5:22 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 7510
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands
I thougt it was an no fly zone....... was the vehicle flying or aiming weapons at the rafale or something? :D

_________________
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
TimothyC
Post subject: Re: No Fly ZonePosted: March 19th, 2011, 5:36 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 3765
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:06 am
Contact: Website
The UNSC resolution allows for the destruction of forces that are threatening civilians.

_________________
𝐌𝐀𝐓𝐇𝐍𝐄𝐓- 𝑻𝒐 𝑪𝒐𝒈𝒊𝒕𝒂𝒕𝒆 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒕𝒐 𝑺𝒐𝒍𝒗𝒆


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Thiel
Post subject: Re: No Fly ZonePosted: March 19th, 2011, 6:19 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 5376
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark
So in essence, we've given ourselves a Carta Blanche

_________________
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
swin_lad
Post subject: Re: No Fly ZonePosted: March 19th, 2011, 7:03 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 312
Joined: December 10th, 2010, 2:05 pm
Location: Swindon Town FC, From the West Country
A less well known resolution was passed to day from what I have heard in which all measures to protect civvies. This means peacekeepers are now authorized.

_________________
Nick

@ashwellkennedy


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
erik_t
Post subject: Re: No Fly ZonePosted: March 19th, 2011, 8:47 pm
Offline
Posts: 2936
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 11:38 pm
Location: Midwest US
Far be it from me to go rah rah rah for a war when I've never and will never serve, but it sure seems like it couldn't happen to a nicer fellah.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
rifleman
Post subject: Re: No Fly ZonePosted: March 19th, 2011, 9:05 pm
Offline
Posts: 501
Joined: September 4th, 2010, 8:44 am
love David camerons statement
"British Forces in action over Libya"
A flying Trafalgar class SSKN should be an interesting sight

_________________
"There was nothing wrong with Titanic when she left the Shipyard" Tim McGarry Belfast Comedian


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Mitchell van Os
Post subject: Re: No Fly ZonePosted: March 19th, 2011, 9:11 pm
Offline
Posts: 1056
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 5:19 pm
110 tomahawks fired on libyan land.
All from usa,british,italian ships.

Time for russia to send the peter de great. Some real firepower!

_________________
Fryssian AU with Lt.Maverick 114
viewtopic.php?f=14&t=9802&p=193331#p193331
[ img ]
Embarked on: HNLMS Karel Doorman A833
To do list:
-Zeven Provincien class cruiser
-Joint support ship all sides
-F124 Sachsen class frigate
-F125 Baden-Württemberg class frigate
-Clemencau class aircraft carrier
-Zeven provincien class frigate
-Poolster class AOR
-Amsterdam class AOR
-Minas Gerais aircraft carrier


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
swin_lad
Post subject: Re: No Fly ZonePosted: March 19th, 2011, 9:12 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 312
Joined: December 10th, 2010, 2:05 pm
Location: Swindon Town FC, From the West Country
rifleman wrote:
love David camerons statement
"British Forces in action over Libya"
A flying Trafalgar class SSKN should be an interesting sight
Gotta love that statement, even if its from Cameron

_________________
Nick

@ashwellkennedy


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
erik_t
Post subject: Re: No Fly ZonePosted: March 19th, 2011, 10:41 pm
Offline
Posts: 2936
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 11:38 pm
Location: Midwest US
MitcheLL300 wrote:
110 tomahawks fired on libyan land.
All from usa,british,italian ships.

Time for russia to send the peter de great. Some real firepower!
Presumably Florida emptied the bulk of her VLS. She's been in that chunk of the Med recently.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Hood
Post subject: Re: No Fly ZonePosted: March 20th, 2011, 11:14 am
Offline
Posts: 7233
Joined: July 31st, 2010, 10:07 am
See that's why we scrapped Harrier and kept Tornado, becuase Tornado can carry Stormshadow and generally carry more ordance further.
Saying that a carrier load of Harriers would be useful for close-in ground attack work.

Even so two surface ships and one sub is pretty piss poor compared to what the US and French navies have out there. Just shows how low we've sunk in the last few years. No good dreaming of carrier ops in 20 years time when you've got hardly enough afloat to deal with today's problems.

_________________
Hood's Worklist
English Electric Canberra FD
Interwar RN Capital Ships
Super-Darings
Never-Were British Aircraft


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 2 of 3  [ 29 posts ]  Return to “Off Topic” | Go to page « 1 2 3 »

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]