Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 7 of 21  [ 201 posts ]  Go to page « 15 6 7 8 921 »
Author Message
Shigure
Post subject: Re: Democratic Republic of AntaraPosted: July 31st, 2016, 8:14 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 967
Joined: May 25th, 2016, 2:05 pm
Glenwood Class ASD- Shannon subclass

[ img ]

Glenwood class, Antaran destroyer laid down 1942

Displacement:
1 860 t light; 1 916 t standard; 2 138 t normal; 2 315 t full load

Dimensions: Length (overall / waterline) x beam x draught (normal/deep)
(410,43 ft / 406,50 ft) x 40,19 ft x (13,12 / 13,76 ft)
(125,10 m / 123,90 m) x 12,25 m x (4,00 / 4,19 m)

Armament:
4 - 5,00" / 127 mm 40,0 cal guns - 59,90lbs / 27,17kg shells, 100 per gun
Dual purpose guns in turret on barbette mounts, 1942 Model
2 x 2-gun mounts on centreline, forward deck forward
1 raised mount - superfiring
Weight of broadside 240 lbs / 109 kg
Main DC/AS Mortars
50 - 250,00 lbs / 113,40 kg Depth Charges + 2 reloads - 5,804 t total
in Stern depth charge racks

Armour:
- Gun armour: Face (max) Other gunhouse (avg) Barbette/hoist (max)
Main: 1,00" / 25 mm 1,00" / 25 mm 1,00" / 25 mm

- Protected deck - single deck:
For and Aft decks: 0,75" / 19 mm
Forecastle: 0,75" / 19 mm Quarter deck: 0,75" / 19 mm

Machinery:
Oil fired boilers, steam turbines,
Geared drive, 2 shafts, 50 847 shp / 37 932 Kw = 35,00 kts
Range 4 800nm at 15,00 kts
Bunker at max displacement = 399 tons

Complement:
156 - 204

Cost:
£1,515 million / $6,062 million

Distribution of weights at normal displacement:
Armament: 73 tons, 3,4%
- Guns: 66 tons, 3,1%
- Weapons: 7 tons, 0,3%
Armour: 164 tons, 7,7%
- Armament: 29 tons, 1,3%
- Armour Deck: 136 tons, 6,4%
Machinery: 1 091 tons, 51,0%
Hull, fittings & equipment: 531 tons, 24,9%
Fuel, ammunition & stores: 278 tons, 13,0%
Miscellaneous weights: 0 tons, 0,0%

Overall survivability and seakeeping ability:
Survivability (Non-critical penetrating hits needed to sink ship):
439 lbs / 199 Kg = 7,0 x 5,0 " / 127 mm shells or 0,3 torpedoes
Stability (Unstable if below 1.00): 1,00
Metacentric height 1,3 ft / 0,4 m
Roll period: 14,9 seconds
Steadiness - As gun platform (Average = 50 %): 82 %
- Recoil effect (Restricted arc if above 1.00): 0,34
Seaboat quality (Average = 1.00): 0,86

Hull form characteristics:
Hull has raised forecastle,
a normal bow and a cruiser stern
Block coefficient (normal/deep): 0,349 / 0,360
Length to Beam Ratio: 10,11 : 1
'Natural speed' for length: 20,16 kts
Power going to wave formation at top speed: 63 %
Trim (Max stability = 0, Max steadiness = 100): 96
Bow angle (Positive = bow angles forward): 10,00 degrees
Stern overhang: 0,00 ft / 0,00 m
Freeboard (% = length of deck as a percentage of waterline length):
Fore end, Aft end
- Forecastle: 30,00%, 22,31 ft / 6,80 m, 18,70 ft / 5,70 m
- Forward deck: 30,00%, 11,15 ft / 3,40 m, 11,15 ft / 3,40 m
- Aft deck: 25,00%, 11,15 ft / 3,40 m, 11,15 ft / 3,40 m
- Quarter deck: 15,00%, 11,15 ft / 3,40 m, 11,15 ft / 3,40 m
- Average freeboard: 13,85 ft / 4,22 m

Ship space, strength and comments:
Space - Hull below water (magazines/engines, low = better): 173,4%
- Above water (accommodation/working, high = better): 116,4%
Waterplane Area: 9 750 Square feet or 906 Square metres
Displacement factor (Displacement / loading): 71%
Structure weight / hull surface area: 35 lbs/sq ft or 173 Kg/sq metre
Hull strength (Relative):
- Cross-sectional: 0,47
- Longitudinal: 0,95
- Overall: 0,50
Cramped machinery, storage, compartmentation space
Adequate accommodation and workspace room
Ship has slow, easy roll, a good, steady gun platform
Poor seaboat, wet and uncomfortable, reduced performance in heavy weather

The Glenwood class was originally a small batch of Shannon class destroyers which first began construction in late 1940. They were modified to carry small personal landing boats which would be used for commando raids or minuscule invasions. The number 3 and 4 turrets, as well as a torpedo launcher, were removed to make space for passenger quarters. With the refit, the Glenwood destroyers could each carry up to 60 passengers, obviously not including crewmen.

Most destroyers of this class were painted black in order to blend in with the night sky during a raid. When not outfitted for raids, these destroyers were often tasked for rescuing missions, such as finding pilots who were shot down in a dogfight.

Ships in class - Launched - Fate

Glenwood - 1940 - Sunk by aircraft 1940
Surries - 1940 - Sunk by coastal artillery 1943
Maggie - 1940 - Sold for scrap 1948
Abrey - 1940 - Sunk as target 1951
Mitchelson - 1940 - Sunk by aircraft 1940

_________________
[ img ]


Last edited by Shigure on August 15th, 2016, 1:48 pm, edited 14 times in total.

Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Thiel
Post subject: Re: Democratic Republic of AntaraPosted: July 31st, 2016, 8:29 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 5376
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark
I suspect you're going to have to loose a bit more equipment than that. The Robert H. Smith conversions of the Sumner class gave up all their torpedoes and two K-guns.
I also suspect t your basic design is overloaded. You're carrying two twin 5" guns more on a slightly smaller hull

_________________
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Shigure
Post subject: Re: Democratic Republic of AntaraPosted: August 1st, 2016, 12:45 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 967
Joined: May 25th, 2016, 2:05 pm
[ img ]

Removed a turret and the torpedo tubes

_________________
[ img ]


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Shigure
Post subject: Re: Democratic Republic of AntaraPosted: August 1st, 2016, 1:58 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 967
Joined: May 25th, 2016, 2:05 pm
Carrywood Class Destroyer

[ img ]

Carrywood class, Antaran destroyer laid down 1938

Displacement:
2 468 t light; 2 538 t standard; 2 821 t normal; 3 048 t full load

Dimensions: Length (overall / waterline) x beam x draught (normal/deep)
(400,09 ft / 395,67 ft) x 39,37 ft x (13,12 / 13,90 ft)
(121,95 m / 120,60 m) x 12,00 m x (4,00 / 4,24 m)

Armament:
4 - 5,00" / 127 mm 40,0 cal guns - 59,90lbs / 27,17kg shells, 100 per gun
Dual purpose guns in turret on barbette mounts, 1938 Model
2 x Single mounts on centreline, forward deck forward
1 raised mount - superfiring
2 x Single mounts on centreline, aft deck aft
1 raised mount aft - superfiring
Weight of broadside 240 lbs / 109 kg
Main Torpedoes
4 - 21,0" / 533 mm, 30,00 ft / 9,14 m torpedoes - 1,966 t each, 7,865 t total
In 1 sets of deck mounted centre rotating tubes
Main DC/AS Mortars
50 - 250,00 lbs / 113,40 kg Depth Charges + 2 reloads - 5,804 t total
in Stern depth charge racks

Armour:
- Gun armour: Face (max) Other gunhouse (avg) Barbette/hoist (max)
Main: 1,00" / 25 mm 1,00" / 25 mm 1,00" / 25 mm

- Protected deck - single deck:
For and Aft decks: 0,50" / 13 mm
Forecastle: 0,50" / 13 mm Quarter deck: 0,50" / 13 mm

Machinery:
Oil fired boilers, steam turbines,
Geared drive, 2 shafts, 76 304 shp / 56 923 Kw = 36,00 kts
Range 5 000nm at 15,00 kts
Bunker at max displacement = 510 tons

Complement:
193 - 251

Cost:
£1,945 million / $7,780 million

Distribution of weights at normal displacement:
Armament: 89 tons, 3,1%
- Guns: 66 tons, 2,3%
- Weapons: 23 tons, 0,8%
Armour: 138 tons, 4,9%
- Armament: 43 tons, 1,5%
- Armour Deck: 95 tons, 3,4%
Machinery: 1 703 tons, 60,4%
Hull, fittings & equipment: 538 tons, 19,1%
Fuel, ammunition & stores: 353 tons, 12,5%
Miscellaneous weights: 0 tons, 0,0%

Overall survivability and seakeeping ability:
Survivability (Non-critical penetrating hits needed to sink ship):
406 lbs / 184 Kg = 6,5 x 5,0 " / 127 mm shells or 0,2 torpedoes
Stability (Unstable if below 1.00): 1,13
Metacentric height 1,5 ft / 0,5 m
Roll period: 13,3 seconds
Steadiness - As gun platform (Average = 50 %): 47 %
- Recoil effect (Restricted arc if above 1.00): 0,23
Seaboat quality (Average = 1.00): 0,43

Hull form characteristics:
Hull has a flush deck,
a normal bow and a cruiser stern
Block coefficient (normal/deep): 0,483 / 0,493
Length to Beam Ratio: 10,05 : 1
'Natural speed' for length: 19,89 kts
Power going to wave formation at top speed: 70 %
Trim (Max stability = 0, Max steadiness = 100): 100
Bow angle (Positive = bow angles forward): 15,00 degrees
Stern overhang: 0,00 ft / 0,00 m
Freeboard (% = length of deck as a percentage of waterline length):
Fore end, Aft end
- Forecastle: 20,00%, 16,50 ft / 5,03 m, 13,29 ft / 4,05 m
- Forward deck: 20,00%, 13,29 ft / 4,05 m, 11,19 ft / 3,41 m
- Aft deck: 45,00%, 11,19 ft / 3,41 m, 11,19 ft / 3,41 m
- Quarter deck: 15,00%, 11,19 ft / 3,41 m, 11,19 ft / 3,41 m
- Average freeboard: 12,07 ft / 3,68 m
Ship tends to be wet forward

Ship space, strength and comments:
Space - Hull below water (magazines/engines, low = better): 201,1%
- Above water (accommodation/working, high = better): 102,2%
Waterplane Area: 10 221 Square feet or 950 Square metres
Displacement factor (Displacement / loading): 63%
Structure weight / hull surface area: 36 lbs/sq ft or 175 Kg/sq metre
Hull strength (Relative):
- Cross-sectional: 0,49
- Longitudinal: 0,61
- Overall: 0,50

[ img ]
1943 refit

The Carrywood class destroyers were notably smaller and less armed and armored than most Antaran designs. The Carrywood destroyers were designed with speed and maneuverability in mind, rather than firepower, compared to destroyers like the Shannon class. The gun houses on this destroyer only carried one turret, and the ship only had one torpedo launcher.

There were plans to convert these light fighting vessels to suite other roles, such as anti submarine warfare. Dench was the only warhip of this class to have ever been modified into an ASW destroyer.

[ img ]
Proposed ASW conversion for the Carrywood class, only Dench underwent the conversion.

Ships in class - Launched - Fate

Carrywood - 1938 - Sunk by surface fire 1944
Oakwood - 1938 - Sunk by aircraft 1940
Dench - 1938 - Sunk as target 1962
Tristan - 1938 - Sunk as target 1958
Mackers - 1938 - Sold to a millionaire 2011

_________________
[ img ]


Last edited by Shigure on August 20th, 2016, 2:09 pm, edited 8 times in total.

Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Keisser
Post subject: Re: Democratic Republic of AntaraPosted: August 1st, 2016, 2:32 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 177
Joined: May 24th, 2016, 11:26 am
I like Carrywood design, it's kinda... Cute.
Some notes:
- You need to add support fairings on your shafts, I suppose.
- I don't see a reason to remove the Hedgehog to install one more rapid-firing AA cannon. Efficiency against submarines gets rather low into the benefit of slightly improving AA fire. It is suitable only if ships you escort suffer from enemy aviation much more then from submarines, but as for me, your universal destroyer transforms into a narrowly focused ships (DD→DE).
I may be wrong, though. See what others will say.

_________________
«A sea is not a barrier, a sea is a road, and those who try to use the sea as an instrument of isolation soon realize their foe has already put the sea into his own service.». - Alfred Thayer Mahan.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Shigure
Post subject: Re: Democratic Republic of AntaraPosted: August 1st, 2016, 3:23 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 967
Joined: May 25th, 2016, 2:05 pm
Keisser wrote:
I like Carrywood design, it's kinda... Cute.
Some notes:
- You need to add support fairings on your shafts, I suppose.
- I don't see a reason to remove the Hedgehog to install one more rapid-firing AA cannon. Efficiency against submarines gets rather low into the benefit of slightly improving AA fire. It is suitable only if ships you escort suffer from enemy aviation much more then from submarines, but as for me, your universal destroyer transforms into a narrowly focused ships (DD→DE).
I may be wrong, though. See what others will say.
From what I saw in a documentary, destroyers were used to help shoot down planes and support larger ships in a force. In extra bofors and a 5" gun provides a bit more firepower against aircraft.

_________________
[ img ]


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Thiel
Post subject: Re: Democratic Republic of AntaraPosted: August 1st, 2016, 3:52 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 5376
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark
Hedgehog was an ahead throwing weapon, so I suspect the aft one is going to be unpleasant for the rest of the ship when it fires. And for a dedicated ASW ship it seems rather lightly armed and the lack of a SONAR installation seems odd. I suggest you look up the various depth charge projectors used during the war.

_________________
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Colosseum
Post subject: Re: Democratic Republic of AntaraPosted: August 1st, 2016, 4:29 pm
Offline
Posts: 5218
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 9:38 pm
Location: Austin, TX
Contact: Website
You're making too many designs too quickly. I can't keep up with all this.

_________________
USN components, camouflage colors, & reference links (World War II only)


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
acelanceloet
Post subject: Re: Democratic Republic of AntaraPosted: August 1st, 2016, 5:33 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 7510
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands
Replacing 2 hedgehogs with an turreted (with deck penetration) gun mounting is not gonna work. The opposite is not impossible, and was actually done during the war on some ships......... which means I wonder if you are doing something horribly wrong.

_________________
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Shigure
Post subject: Re: Democratic Republic of AntaraPosted: August 1st, 2016, 6:36 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 967
Joined: May 25th, 2016, 2:05 pm
Colo, I have 2 other destroyer designs and 3 cruisers which I haven't submitted yet ;) Also I was actually quite fearful I wasn't submitting them fast enough tbh. I haven't even attempted to put much detail into the ships' backrounds and service during world war two either.

acelanceloet, should I have the one without the hedgehogs be the original design?

_________________
[ img ]


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 7 of 21  [ 201 posts ]  Return to “Alternate Universe Designs” | Go to page « 15 6 7 8 921 »

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]