The Tyne is old technology so you'd be looking at things like the MT5 and MT7 nowadays.
Updating the text, at nest round!
Also, the STIR 240s are sort of overkill when a 1.8 or something even smaller would suffice for self-defence
This have been talked about early, she is designed around the RNoN tactical planes where another vessel can detect, paint and command missiles fired from any other ship. In Norway, it would be one of the Fridtjof Nansen class firing up one of it's ESSM or Standard-ER.
^nice, looks like smart-s-mk2 and stir-24 fore and aft, you'll need to add something to represent the CEC USG-2 antenna since the corvette will be doing CEC forward-pass w/ the frigate...
what @heuhen described sounds like engage-on-remote if the frigate fires when the target is not w/in the rf horizon of the frigate (meaning the frigate doesn't detect the target w/ it's spy-1f)...
otoh, if the target moves w/in the rf horizon of the frigate prior to it firing (hence the frigate detects/tracks the target w/ it's spy-1f), then it does not need CEC engage-on-remote...
now if by the phrase "the Skjold class detect and paint the target" @heuhen meant that the Skjold is the one doing the terminal illumination for the SM, then this is forward-pass and requires CEC...
and finally I think the efflux from your NSMs is going to have some negative effects on your daughter craft.
Thus there is an partial blast shielding next to it. It's not ideal, but it's the best I can do with it. The daughter craft is made of aluminium in this case, whit a sort of blast hardened plastic as fender. Better than that I can't do, without compromising the helicopter deck or torpedo tubes. There is an alternative way, and it basicly is to flip around on some of the armament, for example, move VLS aft in an superstructure on the aft deck.