General characteristics
Class and Type: Kentucky class battleship
Displacement: designed; 16,000 tonnes (15,747 long tons; 16,347 short tons)
full load; (17,716 long tons; 19841 short tonnes)
Length: 140 m (459 ft 3 in)
Beam: 25 m (82 ft 3 in)
Draft 8.45 m (27 ft 9in)
Installed power: 18,650 kW (25,000 ihp)
Propulsion: 2 x vertical triple expansion riciprocating engines
2 x electric motor generators as final drive
24 Niclausse boilers
Speed: 40.28 km/h (21.75 kn; 25 mph)
Range: 12,870 km @ 19 km/h (6,950 nmi @ 10 kn; 8,000 @ 12mph)
Complement: 50 officers, 550 rates.
Armament: 8 each (4 x 2) 30 cm (11.8 in)/40 cal Model 1890 BLNR Mark II
8 each (4 x 2) 15 cm (5.9 in)/45 cal guns Model 1888 QFNR Mark II
18 each (1 x 18) 9 cm (3.54 in) 50 cal guns Model 1896 QFNR Mark I
up to 30 each 7 mm (0.275 in) machine guns Hotchkiss Model 1897
Armor: Belt; 15 to 30 cm. (5.9 to 11.8 in)
Decks: 4 to 9 cm (1.57 to 3.54 in)
Barbettes: 25 cm. (9.84 in)
Gunhouses: 15 to 30 cm (5.9 to 11.8 in)
Casemate shields: 20 to 25 cm (7.9 to 9.8 in)
Conning tower: 9.8 in (25 cm)
Notes: Lessons of Sino-Japanese and Spanish American Wars theoretically applied
--- speed and turning radius to outmaneuver enemy ships and avoid torpedoes.
--- many quick fire guns to deal with enemy torpedo boats.
--- uniform battery of main guns to improve salvo accuracy at longer ranges.
--- thicker deck armor to keep out skipping ricochets.
--- armor over machinery, magazines, and internal communications.
--- no armor anywhere else as thin armor is useless against even medium caliber shells.
--- limit superstructure as shellcatchers.
--- more internal subdivision of compartments.
The first American dreadnought in the AU, too late for the war of course. But six years earlier than the South Carolina.
The lessons learned were of course not really applied to this class, but were theoretically incorporated into the ships. The war only confirmed that correct guesses had been made. Speed and turning circle proved to be vital as was the need for a wide beamed steady gun platform. Other such guesses proved not to stand up to the test of combat. Such a glaring mistake was the positioning of hull casemate 9 cm quick fire guns at bow and stern on this class. The guns could not be worked in any sea state approaching sea state 4 which was the usual anticipated Atlantic weather that an American fleet could expect if they had to fight... say the French in the Gulf of Guinea Ghana in defense of the Liberian protectorate. The bow and stern chaser guns sited could not be manned or used during such a battle either, as the main armament blasts over bow and stern literally blew the exposed gun crews over the side.
It was not the first dreadnought of this AU as the Japanese had contracted with the British to build the HIJMS DOREDONUTI to test out similar ideas they had engendered during the First Sino Japanese War. The DOREDONUTI, an ill-fated ship otherwise, still beat the USS KENTUCKY into the water by sixty days, so the British still built the first dreadnought.^1
^1 Yes, DOREDONUTI, that is the Japanese borrow word from English for DREADNOUGHT.
It was a most profound embarrassment for the British who built her, not only because her 10-12 inch guns could equal the broadside of any two other British battleships combined, but also because she blew up in transit to Japan with a fully British crew on board.
How did that happen? Hmm.