Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 1 of 2  [ 11 posts ]  Go to page 1 2 »
Author Message
Thiel
Post subject: British Postwar Heavy CruiserPosted: March 8th, 2011, 5:28 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 5376
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark
Something for the Grey Funnel Line Faction
http://www.nmm.ac.uk/collections/explor ... =1#content
According to the guys over at Secret Projects, its the GW-96A Heavy Cruiser.

_________________
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Novice
Post subject: Re: British Postwar Heavy CruiserPosted: March 8th, 2011, 5:53 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 4126
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 5:25 am
Location: Vrijstaat
A very nice find, Thiel. THX.

_________________
[ img ] Thank you Kim for the crest

"Never fear to try on something new. Remember that the Titanic was built by professionals, and the Ark by an amateur"


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Thiel
Post subject: Re: British Postwar Heavy CruiserPosted: March 8th, 2011, 6:19 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 5376
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark
Thank you.

_________________
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
ALVAMA
Post subject: Re: British Postwar Heavy CruiserPosted: March 8th, 2011, 6:23 pm
http://shipbucket.com/images.php?dir=Ne ... od%201.gif


Top
[Quote]
Thiel
Post subject: Re: British Postwar Heavy CruiserPosted: March 8th, 2011, 6:37 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 5376
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark
Hmm, assuming Tornado's drawing is correct then the model isn't the GW-96A Heavy Cruiser, though it's very similar. It could be an earlier version.
It's certainly an interesting design. (And it would leave the Big Gun fan club drooling)

_________________
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
ALVAMA
Post subject: Re: British Postwar Heavy CruiserPosted: March 8th, 2011, 6:48 pm
Okay! don't forget Tornado is our Hood!


Top
[Quote]
klagldsf
Post subject: Re: British Postwar Heavy CruiserPosted: March 8th, 2011, 7:08 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2765
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 4:14 pm
Thiel wrote:
Hmm, assuming Tornado's drawing is correct then the model isn't the GW-96A Heavy Cruiser, though it's very similar.
That's what the caption says.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Thiel
Post subject: Re: British Postwar Heavy CruiserPosted: March 8th, 2011, 7:13 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 5376
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark
klagldsf wrote:
Thiel wrote:
Hmm, assuming Tornado's drawing is correct then the model isn't the GW-96A Heavy Cruiser, though it's very similar.
That's what the caption says.
I'm not familiar with the RNs postwar cruiser program so I didn't draw the connection between the "1960 Large Cruiser design" and GW-96A Heavy Cruiser.

_________________
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Novice
Post subject: Re: British Postwar Heavy CruiserPosted: March 8th, 2011, 10:42 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 4126
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 5:25 am
Location: Vrijstaat
Be as may that "1960 Large cruiser design" is realy need to be updated to the current standard (mayby Hood will do it?)

_________________
[ img ] Thank you Kim for the crest

"Never fear to try on something new. Remember that the Titanic was built by professionals, and the Ark by an amateur"


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Portsmouth Bill
Post subject: Re: British Postwar Heavy CruiserPosted: March 9th, 2011, 9:33 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 3220
Joined: August 16th, 2010, 7:45 am
Location: Cambridge United Kingdom
Yes, this was the final design as far as I can remember; and it was very large, and without a hope of ever being built. I have done the 'Neptune' class modernised for the Grey Funnel line AU, which is of less displacement, but equally would never have been built. All these designs were the final throw of the RN to get a cruiser hull afloat postwar that could carry Seaslug and the 6-in twin automatic. And of course, in the end they compromised with the County class, not properly a cruiser due to a lack of command facilities, but a decent effort at getting the Seaslug on board.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 1 of 2  [ 11 posts ]  Return to “Sources and Reference Drawings” | Go to page 1 2 »

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]