I'd missed this news in the latest defence review.
A related article.
http://www.defensenews.com/story/defens ... /76266560/
So, it seems the government is practically stopping and starting again from scratch (how many times have we seen this in recent defence procurement?). How this works out cheaper is anyone's guess.
Government claims its a firm number are meaningless given the see-saw of numbers in all naval procurements since 1945 and Cameron's line that a 'cheaper' ship means we can afford more seems disingenuous when they've already cut 5 ships off the requirement.
It's interesting the 5 patrol ships are now called general purpose frigates, only if they are proper high-end OPVs is this true.
6 T45 and 8 T26 are not enough when you're escorting a carrier force, undertaking global operations and supporting the SSBN and SSN fleets in their operations.
I feel this means the 8 surviving ships should be more, not less, capable. Some glorified OPV is just not going to cut it for the ASW mission. It would be better to bite the bullet and acquire FREMM instead, or some other off the shelf design. We could have joined a multinational project like FREMM years ago. I don't think T26 was over-extravagant or over-specced given the roles it needs to undertake. There is no point going down the LCS route the USN has, the RN needs a capable vessel to project its power across the globe. However at almost £1 billion per ship (almost the cost of T45) one has to wonder if BAE isn't over-egging the price somewhat.
I'm not sure what 'lighter' warships means? Displacement, armament fit? Seems rather vague.
As to exports, forget it, reading the Naval Institute Guide to Combat Fleets is painfully obvious Britain hasn't made a warship export since the debacle of the 3 Trinidad & Tobago super-Rivers in 2007, not to mention the Brunei fiasco ten years earlier. Most second-tier nations wanting new frigates have already found what they want by building them at home with French, Italian and Chinese aid. Whether Australia or Canada would buy British is very open to question, they have home industries and different requirements to consider, they certainly won't want a warmed over Super-River.