Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 3 of 4  [ 38 posts ]  Go to page « 1 2 3 4 »
Author Message
Obsydian Shade
Post subject: Re: Canadian Navy Battle Cruiser HMCS NanavutPosted: February 22nd, 2011, 6:54 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 797
Joined: August 13th, 2010, 5:44 am
Contact: Yahoo Messenger, AOL
For a first try, it was ambitious, and the idea certainly is interesting. You may want to gain some experience on smaller vessels before working on something of this scale, however. Likewise, I hope you do decide to stay with us.

_________________
We can't stop here--this is Bat country!

If it's close enough to cast a shadow, I think the flying house wins initiative.

Bronies are like the Forsworn. Everyone agrees that they are a problem but nobody wants to expend the energy rooting them out.

"That is a very graphic analogy which aids understanding wonderfully while being, strictly speaking, wrong in every possible way."


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Paul Carl
Post subject: Re: Canadian Navy Battle Cruiser HMCS NanavutPosted: February 23rd, 2011, 2:10 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 207
Joined: February 21st, 2011, 3:15 am
Thank you for your words of encouragement


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Thiel
Post subject: Re: Canadian Navy Battle Cruiser HMCS NanavutPosted: February 27th, 2011, 9:39 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 5376
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark
Get the colours right, save it as a .PNG file rather than a JPG, and make sure the credits are correct, then we can start looking at the design issues.
Hint: Icing is going to be a major issue.

_________________
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Paul Carl
Post subject: Re: Canadian Navy Battle Cruiser HMCS NanavutPosted: February 27th, 2011, 6:15 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 207
Joined: February 21st, 2011, 3:15 am
Yes I am rethinking the whole concept....stay tune


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Paul Carl
Post subject: HMCS Nanavut Arctic Icebreaking Frigate WIP AUPosted: March 7th, 2011, 1:30 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 207
Joined: February 21st, 2011, 3:15 am
Here is some amendments. I like to get some comments on shading and other items such as scale etc


Last edited by Paul Carl on March 22nd, 2011, 3:00 am, edited 4 times in total.

Top
[Profile] [Quote]
acelanceloet
Post subject: Re: Canadian Navy Battle Cruiser HMCS NanavutPosted: March 7th, 2011, 9:44 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 7510
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands
mini spy-1 on an APAR housing!!!!!!!!!! :O
and what is that landing craft? O.o

_________________
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Paul Carl
Post subject: Re: Canadian Navy Battle Cruiser HMCS NanavutPosted: March 7th, 2011, 7:19 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 207
Joined: February 21st, 2011, 3:15 am
I used the SPY-1 to go along with the weapons fit out, I just used the frame of the mast. If you have a better idea plaesa share with me, As for the landing craft that is a version of utility landing craft the Canadian coast Guard uses. It was included as this ship with not only being a combat vessel maybe used for arctic resupply and shore missions. The barge is 10m let me see if I can find a picture of it for you.

http://t1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9 ... nyGrwHg8og
http://www.boatnerd.com/pictures/specia ... _small.jpg
http://www.boatnerd.com/news/newpicture ... tender.jpg


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Thiel
Post subject: Re: Canadian Navy Battle Cruiser HMCS NanavutPosted: March 7th, 2011, 7:25 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 5376
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark
It actually makes sense. After all, RHIBs and sea ice doesn't go hand in hand. I imagine this one wont mind a few dings along the way.

_________________
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Paul Carl
Post subject: Re: Canadian Navy Battle Cruiser HMCS NanavutPosted: March 7th, 2011, 7:29 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 207
Joined: February 21st, 2011, 3:15 am
The barge we used was for construction supply, resupply fuel dump supply. it actually can carry fuel in its hull. Also we had up to a small tractor on it.

Any other suggestions for this drawing please let me know. I drew it myself but I used parts and equipment already made. ie helo, rhib and weapons. I also tried to keep the IR and Radar signal down. Also should I round the hull to allow for ice as done with other Canadian ships.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Thiel
Post subject: Re: Canadian Navy Battle Cruiser HMCS NanavutPosted: March 7th, 2011, 7:41 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 5376
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark
That's pretty much a must.

_________________
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 3 of 4  [ 38 posts ]  Return to “Beginners Only” | Go to page « 1 2 3 4 »

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]