All:
My primary Source is the book "The First Destroyers" by Lyon. Secondary sources are on-line period images. I know DP has the book as well. It's an awesome reference.
@Thiel:
Officers heads look like they may be "portable" structures, possibly iron posts with canvas dodgers. I'd like to scrutinize photos to be sure. Plus, they may have been on most or all the TBD's. There's enough clutter with the vents that they're not missed. I took it off my D-Class drawing...it was too cluttered. Ditto with the dodgers above the bridge.
@ Ace:
Working on the shadowing. Will post an update Monday. Color choice for the below hull was a simple darker than the stock red in MS Paint. The brown shadow is a couple or three steps darker shade than that. The red is purely cosmetic in my mind because:
At some point (per "First Destroyers") there was a directive that all TBD's be delivered from the manufacturers with no boot topping and flat black overall, specifically even below the waterline! New ships delivered with boot topping and "not-black" were scraped down made black. That was based on visibility experiments made in night attack tests. Everything but flat black didn't work well against spot lights.
Other above surface surfaces had a couple color choices based on where the ships were stationed. Warm climates got white overall with ocher top-hamper. Not sure about below water-line. The main channel/home fleet looks like they were black overall, red inside the vents, and white turtle-back (or pale gray). Early on grays were tried but the Admiralty had a hell of a time with standardization with the hot shot young captains. That gray ranged from nearly white to nearly black...whatever the young buck liked.
Towards WW1 the overall color became gray. It was the best compromise between daytime and night camo. And gray sucked when under spotlights.
More later...wife calling
CraigH