Shipbucket

Maybe. I'm not skilled in how to do with combinating links, but on my own pc I've done that with my ship data base. Of course it demand an effort but not much. I reckon it would be some kind of simular doing the links, but naturally I can't be sure

_________________
Work in progress:
DD County Class PNS Babur (1982)(PAK)
FF Type 21 Class D182 PNS Babur (2000)(PAK)
All relevant Coat of Arms

yes, but how many planes you think there are drawn? and how many nations? I think that goes well over 1000 links....

_________________
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin

Yeah That's the problem! A solution could be to make a thread where links to new planes (and also for ships and vehicles) are placed, and then over time, when you need a plane (or ship etc.) which you find elsewhere then put it in the data base. With so many items it have to been make with passience, but better sooner than later

_________________
Work in progress:
DD County Class PNS Babur (1982)(PAK)
FF Type 21 Class D182 PNS Babur (2000)(PAK)
All relevant Coat of Arms

That's the whole reason we have parts sheets. There have been several aircraft sheets during the life of Shipbucket and most of them reside in the old forum site.
Really the pace of drawing outstrips any parts sheet we can make since its out of date before its even posted!
Also the planebucket thread is purely for posting aircraft drawings when complete, not any kind of "yeah that's cool" type posts. Those should be left to this thread. That way its easier to find what you want without trawling through masses of posts.

As was agreed years ago anyone drawing an aircraft should really be doing blank (either white or shaded grey) and a national aircraft. Why people insists on drawing an aircraft in every single national marking is beyond me. There is no need to, let someone do it if they want it for a particular project. Anyway how many of these have ever been used on a shipbucket drawing except for the carrier-based types and naval helicopters? Learjets and 707s look cool but don't add anything to SB in the SB scale. Maybe folks should be looking to the FD scale for their favourite aircraft?

Myself I paste the new aircraft that attract my fancy onto one of the older plane sheets but its too massive to post here.

_________________
Hood's Worklist
English Electric Canberra FD
Interwar RN Capital Ships
Super-Darings
Never-Were British Aircraft

I just have three folders labeled Landbased, Shipbased and Helicopters. With the exception of the harriers and a few other planes it works perfectly well.

_________________
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.

They're done I think for possible use in AUs on those Aircraft Sheets.

_________________
95% of my drawings are destined for NS, 4.9% for fun, & .1% serious.
Worklist:
Space Shuttle
Atlas V
Delta II/III
Project Constellation
Soyuz series

The CX-113 (Or was it 131?) is in the works. Thankfully as early V/STOL projects go it's fairly well documented in the public domain.

Oh and when replying to the Planebucket, you should do it here. The planebucket is for aircraft only.

_________________
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.

CX-131. The CH-113 was the Canadian Sea Knight.

I've been thinking about doing the (X)C-142, but I'll send you what I have if you want to get it done.

_________________
𝐌𝐀𝐓𝐇𝐍𝐄𝐓- 𝑻𝒐 𝑪𝒐𝒈𝒊𝒕𝒂𝒕𝒆 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒕𝒐 𝑺𝒐𝒍𝒗𝒆

I think I'm mostly done with it, but I'd like to have a look at what you have.

_________________
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.

This is just a heads up everyone: I just finished a cursory check of the Airbus drawings with DLR, and it seems that most if not all of them are off by one degree or another.

_________________
𝐌𝐀𝐓𝐇𝐍𝐄𝐓- 𝑻𝒐 𝑪𝒐𝒈𝒊𝒕𝒂𝒕𝒆 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒕𝒐 𝑺𝒐𝒍𝒗𝒆