» »

Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 8 of 24  [ 235 posts ]  Go to page « 1 … 6 7 8 9 10 … 24 »
[Print view]
Author Message
Hood
Post subject: Re: Novgorod AUPosted: July 16th, 2015, 7:57 am
Offline
Posts: 7233
Joined: July 31st, 2010, 10:07 am
Great additions!

_________________
Hood's Worklist
English Electric Canberra FD
Interwar RN Capital Ships
Super-Darings
Never-Were British Aircraft
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Gollevainen
Post subject: Re: Novgorod AUPosted: July 16th, 2015, 11:41 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 4714
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 5:10 am
Location: Finland
Contact: Website
7.2 New construction
7.2.1 Submarines
[ img ]
[ img ]
7.2.2 Minesweepers
[ img ]
7.2.3 Guard Ships
[ img ]
7.2.4 Aircraft Carriers
[ img ]

_________________
Shipbucket mainsite, aka "The Archive"
New AU project "Aravala"
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Krakatoa
Post subject: Re: Novgorod AUPosted: July 16th, 2015, 12:27 pm
Offline
Posts: 2504
Joined: July 1st, 2014, 12:20 am
Location: New Zealand
Contact: Website
Sorry Golly, but there is no way that a carrier that small could take 42 aircraft, 24 maybe, that would be a maximum. There is just not enough hangar space.

It is actually smaller than the UK/US CVE's that carried 18-24.
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Gollevainen
Post subject: Re: Novgorod AUPosted: July 16th, 2015, 12:43 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 4714
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 5:10 am
Location: Finland
Contact: Website
That what I've wondered myself also but all the sources states that it (the OTL Komsomolets conversion) was to carry 42 aircrafts. Remember that there is two-storey hangar. Also in this AU scenario, as the size of the aircraft increased, so did the number of aircrafts embarked decreased.

_________________
Shipbucket mainsite, aka "The Archive"
New AU project "Aravala"
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
eswube
Post subject: Re: Novgorod AUPosted: July 16th, 2015, 5:12 pm
Offline
Posts: 10696
Joined: June 15th, 2011, 8:31 am
Great additions! :D
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Skyder2598
Post subject: Re: Novgorod AUPosted: July 16th, 2015, 7:27 pm
Offline
Posts: 516
Joined: April 29th, 2015, 7:57 pm
Location: Germany
great work :-)

_________________
best regards
Martin

~~Normerr~~FD stuff~~
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Novice
Post subject: Re: Novgorod AUPosted: July 16th, 2015, 9:23 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 4126
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 5:25 am
Location: Vrijstaat
Great looking carrier, but in your description you that the funnel and superstructure were on the starboard side, but the overhead view shows it to be on the port side.
Also the placing of the lifts so close together will weaken the deck considerably, as the two can be considered to be just one big hole in the deck. May I suggest you move them apart slightly, say about 20 or 30 pixels

_________________
[ img ] Thank you Kim for the crest

"Never fear to try on something new. Remember that the Titanic was built by professionals, and the Ark by an amateur"
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Gollevainen
Post subject: Re: Novgorod AUPosted: July 17th, 2015, 10:27 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 4714
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 5:10 am
Location: Finland
Contact: Website
Damn, I always keep mixing up starboard and port sides :oops:

As for the lifts, they are as descriped in the original references. I belive its actually a one big elevator that can handle one bigger and one smaller aircraft. In this AU, the RKKF soon discovered its apparent shortcommings and in the follow-on carriers the lifts were of different design. Komsomolets will have remodelled lifts during its refit/modernisation in 1940-41.

_________________
Shipbucket mainsite, aka "The Archive"
New AU project "Aravala"
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Hood
Post subject: Re: Novgorod AUPosted: July 17th, 2015, 2:07 pm
Offline
Posts: 7233
Joined: July 31st, 2010, 10:07 am
More fantastic work. Nice to see that interwar design make it into SB.

_________________
Hood's Worklist
English Electric Canberra FD
Interwar RN Capital Ships
Super-Darings
Never-Were British Aircraft
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
seeker36340
Post subject: Re: Novgorod AUPosted: July 17th, 2015, 5:09 pm
Offline
Posts: 617
Joined: June 9th, 2012, 10:21 pm
Gollevainen wrote:
That what I've wondered myself also but all the sources states that it (the OTL Komsomolets conversion) was to carry 42 aircrafts. Remember that there is two-storey hangar. Also in this AU scenario, as the size of the aircraft increased, so did the number of aircrafts embarked decreased.
deck parking?
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 8 of 24  [ 235 posts ]  Return to “Alternate Universe Designs” | Go to page « 1 … 6 7 8 9 10 … 24 »

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests

The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]