Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 20 of 29  [ 288 posts ]  Go to page « 118 19 20 21 2229 »
Author Message
Krakatoa
Post subject: Re: Fisherless Royal NavyPosted: June 20th, 2015, 11:46 am
Offline
Posts: 2504
Joined: July 1st, 2014, 12:20 am
Location: New Zealand
Contact: Website
Changes made as per suggestions

JSB - this is not the OTL.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
MihoshiK
Post subject: Re: Fisherless Royal NavyPosted: June 21st, 2015, 11:07 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 1035
Joined: October 16th, 2010, 11:06 pm
Location: In orbit, watching you draw.
Contact: Website
The Admiral class was a big enough success that a follow-up class was planned. No longer having the luxury of having old triple 15" turrets to put on the new battleships, the new class would mount 16" rifles, also in triple turrets, albeit only three turrets, instead of four. Apart from the changes resulting from that, the class was a virtual copy of the Admirals, and they very nearly got Admiral names too.

Instead the names Vanguard, Vigilant and Valiant were chosen. Vanguard sailed in late 1944, her sisters still being build when the war ended. With the empire in tatters, and Britain exhausted from the war, all work on Vigilant and Valiant was halted, and neither was completed. Ultimately Vanguard would be the last battleship build in the world.

[ img ]

_________________
Would you please not eat my gun...
[ img ]


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
bezobrazov
Post subject: Re: Fisherless Royal NavyPosted: June 22nd, 2015, 10:49 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 3406
Joined: July 29th, 2010, 2:20 pm
Nice.... But Valiant? Since there already existed a battleship named Valiant in 1944... How about "Vengeance"?

_________________
My Avatar:Петр Алексеевич Безобразов (Petr Alekseevich Bezobrazov), Вице-адмирал , царская ВМФ России(1845-1906) - I sign my drawings as Ari Saarinen


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Hood
Post subject: Re: Fisherless Royal NavyPosted: June 22nd, 2015, 12:23 pm
Offline
Posts: 7233
Joined: July 31st, 2010, 10:07 am
Nice work.
I wonder if lowering the forward superstructure block by 1 deck might improve the looks?

_________________
Hood's Worklist
English Electric Canberra FD
Interwar RN Capital Ships
Super-Darings
Never-Were British Aircraft


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
heuhen
Post subject: Re: Fisherless Royal NavyPosted: June 22nd, 2015, 1:54 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 9102
Joined: December 15th, 2010, 10:13 pm
Location: Behind you, looking at you with my mustache!
bezobrazov wrote:
Nice.... But Valiant? Since there already existed a battleship named Valiant in 1944... How about "Vengeance"?
Brits and there awesome BB names, Vanguard, Valiant, Warspite...


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
MihoshiK
Post subject: Re: Fisherless Royal NavyPosted: June 22nd, 2015, 1:54 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 1035
Joined: October 16th, 2010, 11:06 pm
Location: In orbit, watching you draw.
Contact: Website
Hood wrote:
Nice work.
I wonder if lowering the forward superstructure block by 1 deck might improve the looks?
Looks like this. Is starting to get an English Iowa vibe:

[ img ]

In general, the KGV superstructure is kinda small if you're not putting four turrets on a ship. I could elongate it, move the turrets a bit further out and the forward ones closer together, but I like the seperation between the turrets.

_________________
Would you please not eat my gun...
[ img ]


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Krakatoa
Post subject: Re: Fisherless Royal NavyPosted: June 22nd, 2015, 6:12 pm
Offline
Posts: 2504
Joined: July 1st, 2014, 12:20 am
Location: New Zealand
Contact: Website
The separation of turrets is supposed to stop two turrets being taken out by one hit. I like the way it looks now.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Krakatoa
Post subject: Re: Fisherless Royal NavyPosted: June 23rd, 2015, 10:20 am
Offline
Posts: 2504
Joined: July 1st, 2014, 12:20 am
Location: New Zealand
Contact: Website
Captain Class Destroyer Escorts.

With the signing of the Lend/Lease documents, Britain went shopping for its most needed ships. Convoy escorts. The US yards had several designs that would satisfy the RN's needs, but they were armed with US pattern weapons that would have been incompatible with current RN munitions stocks. So the favourite design was altered to include RN weaponry. The original 1940 design as ordered had two single 4" DP mountings forward, one twin 4" DP mounting aft, one quad 2pd pom pom, and six single 20mm AA guns. A set of twin 21" torpedo tubes gave the ships some teeth against larger enemies. The armament was a blend of the Hunt class and River class escorts. The speed was kept to 24 knots as being fast enough to catch up with U-boats and also fast enough to allow the ships to be able to hunt a submerged U-boat and then be able to rejoin the convoy it was escorting.

[ img ]


The armament was altered in 1942 as the first ships were due for completion. The advent of the Hedgehog spigot mortar was a step forward in anti-submarine warfare weapons and one was mounted forward replacing the 'A' 4" mounting. While this reduced the 4" to 3 guns, it was felt that the single gun forward would be enough to handle any surfaced U-Boat.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Krakatoa
Post subject: Re: Fisherless Royal NavyPosted: June 24th, 2015, 1:07 pm
Offline
Posts: 2504
Joined: July 1st, 2014, 12:20 am
Location: New Zealand
Contact: Website
Mihoshik said "Looks like this. Is starting to get an English Iowa vibe"

Be careful what you wish for!!

And for something completely different.

Lion/Vanguard hull with 9x16", 20x4.7", 36x40mm STAAG. Iowa superstructure, aircraft handling facilities aft with hangar below deck.

[ img ]

Backstory for Dimitri97:

With the outbreak of war the future of the Lion class battleships was put on hold. In 1940 the Vanguard project utilising the 15" turrets from those held in storage was started. A second hull was also started due to the signing of the Lend Lease documents. This opened the US navies doors for the RN to purchase goods and services. Part of the subjects shown to the RN was the details of the new 45,000 ton battleships of the Iowa class. The US would not supply a whole battleship but would sell off parts of the design for the British to incorporate in a new battleship. The RN liked the secondary layout of the US superstructure and placement for lots of AA weaponry. The other thing that the US was willing to supply was the propulsion system design of the Iowa's which was superior to that of the Lion design. More horsepower was generated by the US system in a similar sized propulsion installation. This system would produce 200k compared to the 160k of the RN equivalent. The speed would increase from 30 to 32 knots. Using the 4.7" dual purpose turret in place of the US 5" and the new twin 40mm STAAG mountings would provide a superior AA armament compared to any current RN battleship. Keeping the RN armour size and layout gave them a better armour scheme than the Iowas. The only way to keep aircraft handling facilities was to copy the US practice of having the aircraft catapults and cranes at the stern with the aircraft hangar placed underneath. With the loss of 5 battleships early in the war, the priority for the Vanguard and Duke of York was kept high. The loss of two more battleships to the Japanese increased their priority even more. Both Vanguard and Duke of York completed in 1944, just in time to take part in the "Tirpitz Resolution" where like the Scharnhorst, the bait of a closely passing Russian bound convoy was too much to pass up and the Tirpitz was caught at sea. Damaged and slowed by aircraft from the Apollo and Illustrious, the two new battleships caught and sunk the Tirpitz with gunfire. The hulk being finished off with torpedoes from the cruiser Sirius. Transferred to the Pacific fleet the Duke of York saw out the war as the Pacific Fleets Flagship and was present in Tokyo Bay for the Japanese surrender.


Last edited by Krakatoa on June 25th, 2015, 2:51 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
[Profile] [Quote]
BB1987
Post subject: Re: Fisherless Royal NavyPosted: June 24th, 2015, 1:38 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2818
Joined: May 23rd, 2012, 1:01 pm
Location: Rome - Italy
Surely it looks pretty unique. :D
If you allow me one quibble, Krakatoa, it is possible that if completed in 1944 this ship would have got the enclosed pilothouse around the conning tower like the USS Missouri.

_________________
My Worklist
Sources and documentations are the most welcome.

-Koko Kyouwakoku (Republic of Koko)
-Koko's carrier-based aircrafts of WWII
-Koko Kaiun Yuso Kaisha - KoKaYu Line (Koko AU spinoff)
-Koko - Civil Aviation


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 20 of 29  [ 288 posts ]  Return to “Alternate Universe Designs” | Go to page « 118 19 20 21 2229 »

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Majestic-12 [Bot] and 8 guests


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]