Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 9 of 12  [ 112 posts ]  Go to page « 17 8 9 10 11 12 »
Author Message
Blackbuck
Post subject: Re: Cruisers for South AmericaPosted: March 24th, 2015, 6:06 pm
Offline
Posts: 2743
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 9:15 am
Location: Birmingham, United Kingdom
Finalised my two contenders for Chile... Two hugely different takes on the brief :shock:

O'Higgins Class

[ img ]

Specifications:

Dates:
  • In Construction: 1935-39
  • In Service: 1937-55
Particulars:
  • Length: 184.5m (Waterline)
  • Beam: 23m
  • Draught: 5.5m
  • Displacement (Standard):<10,000t claimed - 11,500ish in actuality.
Propulsion:
Four-shaft single-barrelled Rateau-Bretagne geared turbines with 6× Indret boilers for ~100,000SHP
Max. Speed: 33-34kts
Cruising Speed and Ranges
  • 5,000 NMI @ 10kts
  • 1,300 NMI @ 32kts
Manning:
  • Standard: 690
  • Flagship: 725
  • Wartime: 810
Armament:
  • 12x 152mm/55 Mle.1930 (4*3)
  • 6× 100mm/45 Mle.1930/33 (4*1 + 1*2)
  • 8× 37mm/55 Mle.1933 (4*2)
  • 16x 13.2mm Hotchkiss MGs (3*4 + 2*2)
  • 6x 550mm torpedo tubes in two triple-tube side-rotating mounts
Aircraft:
  • 2x Light spotter-aircraft, nominally Nimrod or Osprey.
Armouring Scheme:
  • Main Belt: 140mm tapering to 70mm over barbettes and magazines
  • Ends: 70mm
  • Deck over vitals and magazines: 70mm
  • Turrets: 70 - 140mm depending on face
  • Barbettes: 140mm
  • Other Bulkheads: 40mm
  • Bridge + Tower: Splinter-proofing with limited 40mm plating over critical areas

[ img ]

Specifications:

Dates:
  • In Construction: 1935-39
  • In Service: 1937-55
Particulars:
  • Length: 570ft (Waterline)
  • Beam: 71ft
  • Draught: 23ft
  • Displacement (Standard): <10,000t
Propulsion:
Two-shaft double-barreled geared turbines with 8× Admiralty three-drum boilers for ~80,000SHP
Max. Speed: 32kts
Cruising Speed and Ranges
  • 8000 NMI @ 10kts
  • 2300 NMI @ 30kts
Manning:
  • Standard: 650
  • Flagship: 680
  • Wartime: 720
Armament:
  • 9x BL 8-inch L/50 Mk.VIII guns in triple mounts
  • 8× QF 4-inch L/45 Mk.XVI guns in twin mounts (HA/LA Mk.XIX)
  • 12× QF 2-pounder L/39 Mk.VIII guns in quad mounts (HA Mk.VII)
  • 12x .5-inch L/50 Mk.III machine guns in quad mounts (Mk.I)
  • 6x 21-inch torpedo tubes in triple side-rotating mounts
Aircraft:
  • 2x Light spotter-aircraft, nominally Nimrod or Osprey.
Armouring Scheme:
  • Main Belt: 6-inches tapering to 3 inches
  • Ends: 3-inches
  • Deck over vitals and magazines: 3-inches
  • Turrets: Splinter-proofing
  • Barbettes: 3-inches
  • Other Bulkheads: 1.5-inches
  • Bridge + Tower: Splinter-proofing with limited 1.5 inch plating
~Mark

_________________
AU Projects: | Banbha et al. | New England: The Divided States
Blood and Fire


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Oberon_706
Post subject: Re: Cruisers for South AmericaPosted: March 25th, 2015, 3:33 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 207
Joined: April 1st, 2014, 12:17 am
Location: Sydney, Australia
I modified a concept by Tzoli for an 'Improved' Exeter class some time ago as part of my Falkland Islands AU. I figured it fits the bill for this thread fairly well. Being a descendant of the York class she could theoretically have been built at Palmers of Jarrow, or any RN Dockyard (Exeter was built at Davenport)

[ img ]

The idea is that this is in the 11-13,000 tonne range, with 10 x 8" guns in 5 turrets as primary armament.

PS, don't chastise me over the radar fitout, i know its wrong for the time period i just haven't gotten around to fixing it yet.

Cheers

_________________
"Come to the Dark Side... We have Cookies!"
____________________________________________

[ img ]
____________________________________________
Current Worklist;

DCFI (Falkland Islands) AU Nation


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Krakatoa
Post subject: Re: Cruisers for South AmericaPosted: March 25th, 2015, 7:52 am
Offline
Posts: 2504
Joined: July 1st, 2014, 12:20 am
Location: New Zealand
Contact: Website
That's a good looking cruiser Oberon_706. As you say the radar may need some work. Also the afterbridge where the searchlight, aft director and HACS are very close together and may interfere with each other, you may need to spread them out a bit more. You could lengthen the aft superstructure toward the X turret and give that area a bit more space.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Naixoterk
Post subject: Re: Cruisers for South AmericaPosted: March 25th, 2015, 8:17 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 521
Joined: July 8th, 2013, 7:55 pm
I like this thread and both the drawings and the AU backstories are very interesting.

However, if you allow me a small criticism, it seems for the posters that in South America there are only 4 countries that could host a cruiser in their navies: Brasil, Argentina, Chile and sometimes Peru. I honestly think that other South American countries like Colombia or Venezuela could host more than one cruisers in the navies.

_________________
Currently working on:
  • Fiat G.50
    Breda Ba.64/65/75
    Dornier Do.17/Do.215
    Heinkel He.79
    Junkers Ju.52
    Junkers J.I
Repainting:
  • Grumman F4F Wildcat/Grumman G-36
    Caproni Ca.135bis


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Hood
Post subject: Re: Cruisers for South AmericaPosted: March 25th, 2015, 8:47 am
Offline
Posts: 7233
Joined: July 31st, 2010, 10:07 am
Fantastic work Blackbuck, both of those look very different and offer something unusual.

Nice work Oberon, looks a plausible layout and seems about right if they want to spend some extra cash and get something really powerful.

Peru had a couple of old light cruisers that could have been replaced, Colombia I think in the period had very little of a navy other than some gunboats on the Amazon and two ex-Spanish destroyers brought cheap. Venezuela had an even smaller navy, not until the 1950s did she seek large destroyers etc. I think the war in general pushed a little extra dollars and bauxite and oil profits began to grow then. In the absence of hard cash it was hard for them to fund cruiser, remember with few battleships being built, these are the most expensive export warships of the time.

_________________
Hood's Worklist
English Electric Canberra FD
Interwar RN Capital Ships
Super-Darings
Never-Were British Aircraft


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Krakatoa
Post subject: Re: Cruisers for South AmericaPosted: March 26th, 2015, 10:26 am
Offline
Posts: 2504
Joined: July 1st, 2014, 12:20 am
Location: New Zealand
Contact: Website
This too may be slightly outside the parameters of the challenge, but it goes with some of the other big cruisers. It also satisfies the nine gun cravings of some of the South American countries.

[ img ]


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Blackbuck
Post subject: Re: Cruisers for South AmericaPosted: March 26th, 2015, 10:44 am
Offline
Posts: 2743
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 9:15 am
Location: Birmingham, United Kingdom
Interesting. I do wonder if something more in line with the original idea for Lützow might be a alternative choice. 12*150mm/60 is still going to cause a lot of hurt among the navies of the Americas.

_________________
AU Projects: | Banbha et al. | New England: The Divided States
Blood and Fire


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Krakatoa
Post subject: Re: Cruisers for South AmericaPosted: March 26th, 2015, 10:52 am
Offline
Posts: 2504
Joined: July 1st, 2014, 12:20 am
Location: New Zealand
Contact: Website
I thought about it B.B., but there is already one of those in the archives (real never-were). This way I get to keep my cut and paste skills up to date. Beside I enjoyed making the triples. I will use them on an uprated Prinz Eugen with 12x8".


[ img ]


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Naixoterk
Post subject: Re: Cruisers for South AmericaPosted: March 26th, 2015, 1:17 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 521
Joined: July 8th, 2013, 7:55 pm
Hood wrote:
Peru had a couple of old light cruisers that could have been replaced, Colombia I think in the period had very little of a navy other than some gunboats on the Amazon and two ex-Spanish destroyers brought cheap. Venezuela had an even smaller navy, not until the 1950s did she seek large destroyers etc. I think the war in general pushed a little extra dollars and bauxite and oil profits began to grow then. In the absence of hard cash it was hard for them to fund cruiser, remember with few battleships being built, these are the most expensive export warships of the time.
But i think that both Colombian and Venezuelan navies could host a light cruiser... After all, the Italian designs were the cheaps if i'm not mistaken...

_________________
Currently working on:
  • Fiat G.50
    Breda Ba.64/65/75
    Dornier Do.17/Do.215
    Heinkel He.79
    Junkers Ju.52
    Junkers J.I
Repainting:
  • Grumman F4F Wildcat/Grumman G-36
    Caproni Ca.135bis


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Krakatoa
Post subject: Re: Cruisers for South AmericaPosted: March 26th, 2015, 6:36 pm
Offline
Posts: 2504
Joined: July 1st, 2014, 12:20 am
Location: New Zealand
Contact: Website
Naixoterk, I have already done a small cruiser for Peru on Page 2. I also have in mind to do some other small cruisers - destroyer leader sized vessels for the smaller nations.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 9 of 12  [ 112 posts ]  Return to “Personal Designs” | Go to page « 17 8 9 10 11 12 »

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]