Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 13 of 18  [ 173 posts ]  Go to page « 111 12 13 14 1518 »
Author Message
Novice
Post subject: Re: Proposed 25,000 ton Battleships and BattlecruisersPosted: January 19th, 2015, 5:26 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 4126
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 5:25 am
Location: Vrijstaat
smurf wrote:
The real-life armament of the L,M destroyers (apart from four Ls with 4x2 4"HA) was the 62pdr 4.7" L50 in the MkXX weatherproof gunhouse (not turret, there was no rotating ammunition feed below deck) which gave an elevation of 50 degrees. These look very like the mounts depicted above on Musketeer.
http://www.navweaps.com/Weapons/WNBR_47-50_mk11.htm
The turret version of the 4.5" BD (elevation 80 degrees)was as shown on Matchless 1957 above, but was fitted to the Battle class. Matchless never had them.
The 1957 Matchless above is from an AU project done by the Grey Funnel faction some time ago. It was a big What-if undertaking showing a possible development of the RN post war.
As a side note, I believe it was never really completed.

_________________
[ img ] Thank you Kim for the crest

"Never fear to try on something new. Remember that the Titanic was built by professionals, and the Ark by an amateur"


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
smurf
Post subject: Re: Proposed 25,000 ton Battleships and BattlecruisersPosted: January 19th, 2015, 6:42 pm
Offline
Posts: 207
Joined: October 25th, 2014, 7:46 pm
I was using 'above on Musketeer' and 'on Matchless 1957 above' simply to identify the turrets. To be really precise I should have said "The real Matchless never had them"
Nevertheless, I have seen (incorrect) suggestions elsewhere that M class destroyers had Battle class turrets installed before sale to Turkey, perhaps because such AU depictions can get taken out of the context their authors intended.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Garlicdesign
Post subject: Re: Proposed 25,000 ton Battleships and BattlecruisersPosted: January 19th, 2015, 8:36 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 1071
Joined: December 26th, 2012, 9:36 am
Location: Germany
Hello again!

OK, first try with Dropbox after Majhost seems to have permanently gone belly-up...

I don't know if this really belongs here, but size-wise it seems just about right. What if - for whatever reason, entirely hypothetically - Germany had been limited to 20.000 tons per capital ship rather than 10.000 tons by the Versailles treaty (I know, for Great Britain everything about Versailles was negotiable except the 10.000 ton limit for new German ships, but just hypothetically)?

The result might have been that the pocket battleship Deutschland might have been turned out rather differently. According to SpringSharp, a 20.000-ton hull (21.500 tons after a little cheating) could pack 3x3 279mm/54 guns, 8x1 150mm/45 guns, 5x2 88mm/71 guns, 8x2 37mm/83 guns and a dozen single 20mm MGs, plus 2x4 500mm torpedoes. On a citadel a little longer than 120 meters, there also would be space for a catapult (the german ones were rather short) as soon as the political situation allowed for it. Design-wise, I modeled the ship after some of the late-WWI designs for fast capital ships with three turrets, two of them aft where a dedicated raider, which would spend much of its time evading enemy heavies, would need them most. It also would make sense to provide two more or less identical tube masts (with the majority of the heavy guns aft, the aft one would come in useful). Propulsion would have been provided by Diesels only, with the same engine installation as the Deutschland, but three rather than two shafts, giving 81.000hp for a little under 28 knots design speed - enough to evade anything existing at that time except HMS Repulse, Renown and Hood. A vertical belt of 280mm with extensive - if thin - plating at the ship ends (again, necessary for a raider which could otherwise be forced to abort mission by a few shell holes forward or aft close to the waterline from light cruiser guns) and an armoured deck of 120mm would make the ship tough enough to be immune against cruisers of any size, and even give it a chance to absorb a few 15" hits while eloping.

[ img ]

If she survived till 1944, there would be some modifications typical for German ships of that era. A clipper bow would be fitted to improve seakeeping; the torpedoes would likely be removed due to their awkward placement between the aft barbettes; fire control radar would be fitted to both main directors; an air surveillance radar would be fitted to the mainmast and a passive radar receiver to the foremast; and the number of 20mm guns would increase to 60 (11x4 and 16x1). And of course, she would receive some fancy camouflage.

[ img ]

Greetings
GD


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
JSB
Post subject: Re: Proposed 25,000 ton Battleships and BattlecruisersPosted: January 19th, 2015, 8:47 pm
Offline
Posts: 1433
Joined: January 21st, 2014, 5:33 pm
Very nice :mrgreen:


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
BB1987
Post subject: Re: Proposed 25,000 ton Battleships and BattlecruisersPosted: January 19th, 2015, 8:48 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2818
Joined: May 23rd, 2012, 1:01 pm
Location: Rome - Italy
GD never fails to deliver awesomeness.

_________________
My Worklist
Sources and documentations are the most welcome.

-Koko Kyouwakoku (Republic of Koko)
-Koko's carrier-based aircrafts of WWII
-Koko Kaiun Yuso Kaisha - KoKaYu Line (Koko AU spinoff)
-Koko - Civil Aviation


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
KHT
Post subject: Re: Proposed 25,000 ton Battleships and BattlecruisersPosted: January 19th, 2015, 9:59 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 1396
Joined: November 19th, 2011, 12:49 pm
Looking great. I love the sillouete and the layout of the superstructure, with those tubular masts.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
emperor_andreas
Post subject: Re: Proposed 25,000 ton Battleships and BattlecruisersPosted: January 19th, 2015, 11:10 pm
Offline
Posts: 3910
Joined: November 17th, 2010, 8:03 am
Location: Corinth, MS USA
Contact: YouTube
EPIC job, GD...LOVE them!

_________________
[ img ]
MS State Guard - 08 March 2014 - 28 January 2023

The Official IJN Ships & Planes List

#FJB


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Krakatoa
Post subject: Re: Proposed 25,000 ton Battleships and BattlecruisersPosted: January 19th, 2015, 11:34 pm
Offline
Posts: 2504
Joined: July 1st, 2014, 12:20 am
Location: New Zealand
Contact: Website
Nice work GD, that would fall neatly into my AU for Germany where they get to build 60% of 35,000 tons (21,000) ships.

You would have trouble working out if it was coming or going with that silhouette.

Don't forget the Kongos, at that stage Japan and GB were still supposedly buddies, if relations were somewhat strained.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
eltf177
Post subject: Re: Proposed 25,000 ton Battleships and BattlecruisersPosted: January 20th, 2015, 10:56 am
Offline
Posts: 503
Joined: July 29th, 2010, 5:03 pm
She's beautiful!


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
apdsmith
Post subject: Re: Proposed 25,000 ton Battleships and BattlecruisersPosted: January 20th, 2015, 3:41 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 855
Joined: August 29th, 2013, 5:58 pm
Location: Manchester, UK
Wow, Garlicdesign nails it again. Really nice drawing GD!

I do have a question, however - one of the others here (I think it was Krakatoa or smurf but for the life of me cannot remember for sure) have pointed out that it's beneficial for FC purposes to have as few different elevations on the turrets as possible ... would it be a good idea to lift the front turret 2px so it is at the same height as the Bruno turret?

Regards,
Ad

_________________
Public Service Announcement: This is the preferred SB / FD font.
[ img ]
NSWE: viewtopic.php?f=14&t=5695


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 13 of 18  [ 173 posts ]  Return to “Personal Designs” | Go to page « 111 12 13 14 1518 »

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]