Posts:457 Joined: June 8th, 2013, 3:05 pm
Location: Marin County, California
Contact:Website
And the first to things that came to mind were WW2 beach landings and fighting off hords of galleys back in antiquity.
For modern warfare...why? It might be of use against local guerrillas when the Marines hit a beach. Beyond that use regular aircraft dropped cluster bomb. Save the ship volume for something else.
CraigH
_________________ In active progress More Ships with Sails
Early Torpedo Boats in SB and FD Scales
Some railroad stuff
More random stuff that strikes me!
Posts:5376 Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark
For the same reason the USN navy has tried getting NLOS, POLAR and a whole slew of other ship launched ground attack munitions into service and why they built the USS Carronade back in the day. Outside of 5in range the USN, or any other navy for that matter, doesn't have anything suitable to attacking troop formations without calling in an airstrike which might not always be available at short enough notice, not to mention all those navies that don't have access to them at all.
Also, I suspect modern anti tank cluster bombs would do "unpleasant" things to a thin skinned destroyer.
_________________ “Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error
Posts:7510 Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands
to expand a bit on Thiel's post above, they would certainly impact the systems and disable most radars, which would give interesting results as well........ that said, fleet formations are too wide to hit multiple ships at once but with the correct guidance, I can assume this weapon might be worthwile. that said, if that guidance systems drives up the cost or the impact on the launchers size.... then we are back were we started.
_________________ Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new. Shipbucket Wiki admin
Posts:457 Joined: June 8th, 2013, 3:05 pm
Location: Marin County, California
Contact:Website
For anti shipping, aren't there affordable off the shelf missiles available to small navies that would do the job? Just asking...modern munitions aren't my area and this looks like a chance to learn some basics.
_________________ In active progress More Ships with Sails
Early Torpedo Boats in SB and FD Scales
Some railroad stuff
More random stuff that strikes me!
Posts:5376 Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark
Cluster munitions wouldn't be my go to tool for anti ship strikes either, but you know, any harbour in a storm. They are however probably the best tool in the box for attacking soft ground targets and troop formations. Of course cluster munitions are a big political no-no these days due to their nasty tendency to leave a lot of duds around for kids to pick up and get blown to bits by.
For anti ship strikes I'd go with one of the available low flying cruise missiles with a substantial unitary SAP-HE warhead. They're a lot more expensive than unguided rockets, but they're also harder to defend against and a lot more likely to actually hit the intended target.
_________________ “Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error
Posts:658 Joined: March 26th, 2013, 7:44 pm
Location: Nottingham. United Kingdom
In modern warfare i cant see were this weapon would be of use.
modern surface warfare tends to be spread over larger areas the best attack to take out or neutralise a task force is probably a saturation attack using probably cheaper and more abundant surface and air launched harpoon or equivalent missiles....