could you explain to me how you get twice the amount of main guns, 3 times the amount of 40mm, twice the amount of tertiary guns (of a larger size then the 25mm of the fletcher), a higher top speed, the same amount of torpedo tubes, and a double set of fire control equipment compared with the fletcher class, which was already an big destroyer for it's time, into an destroyer? the hull size and arnament seems to match, but I do not think it is still an destroyer. the displacement should logically be more then twice that of an fletcher, leaving it at more then 4000 tons.
if I compare it for example with an atlanta class light cruiser, it has lesser 5in guns, (10 instead of 16,) 50% more 40mm guns, almost 3 times the amount of tertiary guns (again also of an larger caliber), more torpedo tubes, a higher top speed, but the same amount of power to get to that speed. but the atlanta class was about the same length.
combining the above, your ship would most likely go 35 knots max, would be 5000 tons or more, and would not be build in such numbers because it would be too costly. in addition, the ship would most likely receive some armour for the same reason. even if classified as destroyer, she would still have running costs, crew cost and building costs of an light cruiser.
so yeah, on first glance this destroyer is less bad then most of your other designs, but realism is still not there.
a question from me, btw: why is the destroyer electrically driven? shortening the shaft lines? industrial availability of gear cutting? I see no other reasons for a ship of this time era and this type to have turbine-electric drive, and in any case I do not think it is worth it unless it is forced upon you by circumstances.
Okay I will modify the destroyer to make it more sensible. I will remove the 40 mm anti-air cannons and I will reduce the speed and reduce the crew