Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 1 of 2  [ 11 posts ]  Go to page 1 2 »
Author Message
Obsydian Shade
Post subject: FRAM hangar conversion?Posted: February 14th, 2011, 11:08 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 797
Joined: August 13th, 2010, 5:44 am
Contact: Yahoo Messenger, AOL
I wanted to rework my Gearing FRAM into something a bit more practical, and my thought was to give it an actual helo hangar, likely capable of holding one Seasprite, but I notice that nobody else who operated the things went in that direction, even nations like Taiwan who certainly could have if they wanted to. Is there something wrong with the hullform that makes a traditional hangar and helopad arrangement, as opposed to that raised pad and tiny hangar, a bad idea?

_________________
We can't stop here--this is Bat country!

If it's close enough to cast a shadow, I think the flying house wins initiative.

Bronies are like the Forsworn. Everyone agrees that they are a problem but nobody wants to expend the energy rooting them out.

"That is a very graphic analogy which aids understanding wonderfully while being, strictly speaking, wrong in every possible way."


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Portsmouth Bill
Post subject: Re: FRAM hangar conversion?Posted: February 15th, 2011, 8:17 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 3220
Joined: August 16th, 2010, 7:45 am
Location: Cambridge United Kingdom
The Taiwanese seemed to have used the existing hangar (for the DASH ) to ship a small Hughes helicopter. I would expect that the task of converting the ship to carry the bigger Seasprite wasn't worth the cost, plus it would probably have create more problems with top weight etc.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Novice
Post subject: Re: FRAM hangar conversion?Posted: February 15th, 2011, 8:22 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 4126
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 5:25 am
Location: Vrijstaat
Greece used the French Alouette III helicopter on some of their Gearings (the one numbered D210 as an example)

_________________
[ img ] Thank you Kim for the crest

"Never fear to try on something new. Remember that the Titanic was built by professionals, and the Ark by an amateur"


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Portsmouth Bill
Post subject: Re: FRAM hangar conversion?Posted: February 15th, 2011, 9:15 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 3220
Joined: August 16th, 2010, 7:45 am
Location: Cambridge United Kingdom
That is interesting; and I wonder if they could get the bigger helicopter into the existing hangar: I would think not, so maybe they just had it on the landing pad?


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Gollevainen
Post subject: Re: FRAM hangar conversion?Posted: February 15th, 2011, 9:24 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 4714
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 5:10 am
Location: Finland
Contact: Website
I've for long wondered why haven't a´nybody taken their luck with this one:
[ img ]

_________________
Shipbucket mainsite, aka "The Archive"
New AU project "Aravala"


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
graham
Post subject: Re: FRAM hangar conversion?Posted: February 15th, 2011, 12:23 pm
Offline
Posts: 209
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 10:49 am
I suspect that as the orginal FRAM was done to take a very smal and light DASH that the undeling super structure couldn't handle a much heaver helio not to mension $$$$ of the actual helio, crew space weapon,s maintaneance and increased avgas fuel loads
I never did figure out what helio I should have put on this one
graham

[ img ]


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Novice
Post subject: Re: FRAM hangar conversion?Posted: February 15th, 2011, 2:29 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 4126
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 5:25 am
Location: Vrijstaat
The Themistocles was the former USS Frank Knox (DD-742), which was converted to a DDR and after recieving her FRAM II refit she was still without any DASH hangar or pad. The landing pad and hangar were built in 1978 by the Greek navy when the ship was refitted, and that how she ended her life
[ img ]
Armament 6 X 5"/38 guns in twin turrets
2 Mk. 11 Hedgehog, and two Mk.32 ASW torpedo launchers
1 Alouette III helicopter.
Sensors: radar SPS-29 and SPS-10, Mk.25 fire control radar.
sonars (?) SQS-23 and SQA-10 VDS

_________________
[ img ] Thank you Kim for the crest

"Never fear to try on something new. Remember that the Titanic was built by professionals, and the Ark by an amateur"


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Portsmouth Bill
Post subject: Re: FRAM hangar conversion?Posted: February 15th, 2011, 4:02 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 3220
Joined: August 16th, 2010, 7:45 am
Location: Cambridge United Kingdom
Great Stuff :) And graham mate, you really need to finish off your version ;)


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Obsydian Shade
Post subject: Re: FRAM hangar conversion?Posted: February 16th, 2011, 12:08 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 797
Joined: August 13th, 2010, 5:44 am
Contact: Yahoo Messenger, AOL
Very interesting, and thanks very much for all the input! I was planning much the same modification with the Sea Sparrow launcher forward, though I was going to keep the Asroc midships. It's a hard guess on that hangar, but I may be able to find a bit of space somewhere.

_________________
We can't stop here--this is Bat country!

If it's close enough to cast a shadow, I think the flying house wins initiative.

Bronies are like the Forsworn. Everyone agrees that they are a problem but nobody wants to expend the energy rooting them out.

"That is a very graphic analogy which aids understanding wonderfully while being, strictly speaking, wrong in every possible way."


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Obsydian Shade
Post subject: Re: FRAM hangar conversion?Posted: February 16th, 2011, 2:26 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 797
Joined: August 13th, 2010, 5:44 am
Contact: Yahoo Messenger, AOL
[ img ]

This is what I had in mind. Still something of a WIP, it illustrates my general idea.

_________________
We can't stop here--this is Bat country!

If it's close enough to cast a shadow, I think the flying house wins initiative.

Bronies are like the Forsworn. Everyone agrees that they are a problem but nobody wants to expend the energy rooting them out.

"That is a very graphic analogy which aids understanding wonderfully while being, strictly speaking, wrong in every possible way."


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 1 of 2  [ 11 posts ]  Return to “Off Topic” | Go to page 1 2 »

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 18 guests


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]