Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 2 of 3  [ 21 posts ]  Go to page « 1 2 3 »
Author Message
Krakatoa
Post subject: Re: Alternate Renown Class Fast-Battleship/Battlecruiser 191Posted: September 15th, 2014, 11:22 pm
Offline
Posts: 2504
Joined: July 1st, 2014, 12:20 am
Location: New Zealand
Contact: Website
Added rebuilt CV, HMS Lord Gambier, with alternate airgroup of Gloster Griffons, Blackburn Skuas, and Fairey SeaBattles.

The rebuilding of the four ships of the Kitchener class brought them well in line with later purpose built carriers, while the air group was still modest, the better more capable aircraft made up the difference.

The anti-aircraft battery is showing signs of the major increases that would be added over the next 5-6 years (if they last that long).

Thanks for the comment Mihoshik.



Edit: one to go, the rebuilt BC's.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Krakatoa
Post subject: Re: Alternate Renown Class Fast-Battleship/Battlecruiser 191Posted: September 16th, 2014, 3:38 am
Offline
Posts: 2504
Joined: July 1st, 2014, 12:20 am
Location: New Zealand
Contact: Website
Finished side view of HMS Reliant, after rebuilding in 1940/41 outfit of guns and radar.

HMS Reliant has had bulges fitted at which time the old 11" belt armour removed and replaced with a 12" slab. The ship has been gutted from B to X turret, while old superstructure removed, new boilers and engines fitted. A new addition of 3" of armour to the main deck increased the horizontal armour to a respectable 5.5". New superstructure fitted with ten twin turrets of the 4.5" guns. Six octuple 2pounder mountings fitted into and around the fore and aft superstructure. The last of the 0.5" quad machine guns were removed from the turret tops and replaced with the new twin 40mm mounting. More space would be found for extra 40mm mountings in the future. Aircraft handling equipment and hangar areas fitted in aft superstructure.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
JSB
Post subject: Re: Alternate Renown Class Fast-Battleship/Battlecruiser 191Posted: September 16th, 2014, 7:16 am
Offline
Posts: 1433
Joined: January 21st, 2014, 5:33 pm
Very nice !

Is it worth rebelting in 1940/41 ? I would have thought that 12 slabs would be very short post 37 and better used on new ships ? and the benefit isn't very great compared to extra deck ?

JSB


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Hood
Post subject: Re: Alternate Renown Class Fast-Battleship/Battlecruiser 191Posted: September 16th, 2014, 12:12 pm
Offline
Posts: 7233
Joined: July 31st, 2010, 10:07 am
Excellent looking ships!
I've no problem with refitting a new belt if something is lying around. I suspect it would be more modern (harder) armour than the original 1914-16 era stuff.

_________________
Hood's Worklist
English Electric Canberra FD
Interwar RN Capital Ships
Super-Darings
Never-Were British Aircraft


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Krakatoa
Post subject: Re: Alternate Renown Class Fast-Battleship/Battlecruiser 191Posted: September 16th, 2014, 12:55 pm
Offline
Posts: 2504
Joined: July 1st, 2014, 12:20 am
Location: New Zealand
Contact: Website
Thanks for your comments.

Yes the production of case hardened armour went through various phases reaching its peak in the late 30's.

I am glad you like them Hood since 90% of the original side view parts come from your original drawings. :)


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
MihoshiK
Post subject: Re: Alternate Renown Class Fast-Battleship/Battlecruiser 191Posted: September 16th, 2014, 7:51 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 1035
Joined: October 16th, 2010, 11:06 pm
Location: In orbit, watching you draw.
Contact: Website
I can't imagine they'd narrow the aft part of the Gambier's flightdeck like that in a refit. It cuts down tremendously on parking space, and I can't think of a real reason they would do it.

_________________
Would you please not eat my gun...
[ img ]


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Bombhead
Post subject: Re: Alternate Renown Class Fast-Battleship/Battlecruiser 191Posted: September 16th, 2014, 9:42 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2299
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 7:41 pm
No definately not a good idea to do away with the full width flight deck aft. That would be an awefully small fantail to aim for. :shock: As well as all the other disadvantages. Good looking drawings Nigel.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Krakatoa
Post subject: Re: Alternate Renown Class Fast-Battleship/Battlecruiser 191Posted: September 17th, 2014, 5:21 am
Offline
Posts: 2504
Joined: July 1st, 2014, 12:20 am
Location: New Zealand
Contact: Website
I have taken aboard Bombheads and Mihoshiks comments and rebuilt the back end of the Lord Gambier.

With the completion of the overhead for the Reliant, that is the end of this series.

Thanks to everyone for your comments, without those comments, good and bad, I would not learn and my kitbashes get better, my overheads are ok but not up to Heuhens standard yet.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
JSB
Post subject: Re: Alternate Renown Class Fast-Battleship/Battlecruiser 191Posted: September 17th, 2014, 4:59 pm
Offline
Posts: 1433
Joined: January 21st, 2014, 5:33 pm
They are all very nice well done !

My only thoughts would be that the CV could just have the same stern as it had before, why rebuild the rear part of the flight deck and elevators when you don't have to ? (HMT would be pleased ;) )

JSB


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Dmitri97
Post subject: Re: Alternate Renown Class Fast-Battleship/Battlecruiser 191Posted: September 18th, 2014, 2:56 am
Offline
Posts: 86
Joined: June 10th, 2014, 7:22 pm
Fantastic ships! I wish these were built instead of the ships that actually were!


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 2 of 3  [ 21 posts ]  Return to “Personal Designs” | Go to page « 1 2 3 »

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]