Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 21 of 22  [ 211 posts ]  Go to page « 118 19 20 21 22 »
Author Message
Bombhead
Post subject: Re: John Company - From India to the worldPosted: August 24th, 2014, 8:40 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2299
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 7:41 pm
Nice work Trojan. ;)


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Rowdy36
Post subject: Re: John Company - From India to the worldPosted: August 25th, 2014, 4:53 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 942
Joined: August 1st, 2010, 7:51 am
Location: Perth, Australia
Trojan wrote:
Thank you Rowdy. Both ships have FLIRs/Optical Surveillance already mounted on the bridge, do you think it would be best to just replace those with TOPLITE?
Up to you really. From a RAN perspective, the Armidale class patrol boats use Toplite for both search/observation and gun control, whereas the Anzac class frigates use Toplite just for gun control and have a separate system for search/observation. I guess it would come down to how much money you had available, but probably just replacing the current ones would be the best for what these ships will be doing.

_________________
[ img ]


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
HMS Sophia
Post subject: Re: John Company - From India to the worldPosted: August 26th, 2014, 11:29 am
Offline
Posts: 863
Joined: May 6th, 2011, 10:34 am
So, I have an idea for the 70's flagship design.
I'm pondering something truly ridiculous based on the RFA Engadine design. By the 70's, the GTC's air arm would be flying (presumably) some form of VTOL craft, almost certain to be the harrier.
So here's my idea. Take the Engadine (I'm drawing it currently):
[ img ]
And replace that forward mast with a Zell launcher platform for the harrier. A ramp, a blast sheild, and big RATO packs. Something harking back to the CAM ships with their hurry's back in the war. Possibly shifting the superstructure around, but they need a big landing platform.
Might take a look at the hook landing system, was it the canadians who designed that?
But anyway. Thoughts? Yes, it's a truly ridiculous idea. But it sounds fun...

ETA: Thinking further on this... I'm pondering bridge aft, hanger fore of bridge, landing platform centred and then the Zell platform in the bows. It would be a major redesign of engadine. but that's just an idea, not a set in stone plan.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
odysseus1980
Post subject: Re: John Company - From India to the worldPosted: August 26th, 2014, 3:59 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 3607
Joined: November 8th, 2010, 8:53 am
Location: Athens,Hellenic Kingdom
Contact: Website
An OPV with hangar for two Sea king could be based on Engadine, but the Zell program was not successful. Weight is another matter.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
JSB
Post subject: Re: John Company - From India to the worldPosted: August 26th, 2014, 4:23 pm
Offline
Posts: 1433
Joined: January 21st, 2014, 5:33 pm
Would any OPV based on RFA Engadine (K08) be a bit slow (and unmanoeuvrable ?) she only made 16 Kn on 1 screw.

JSB


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Thiel
Post subject: Re: John Company - From India to the worldPosted: August 26th, 2014, 4:52 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 5376
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark
That depends entirely on what you use them for, where you do it and how you do it. The term OPV can be applied to just about any military or para-military ship that operates outside of coastal waters. A ship designed for fisheries patrols in the North Sea has very different requirements than one doing drug interdiction in the Caribbean.
It also depends on when the conversion takes place.

_________________
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
HMS Sophia
Post subject: Re: John Company - From India to the worldPosted: August 26th, 2014, 6:47 pm
Offline
Posts: 863
Joined: May 6th, 2011, 10:34 am
odysseus1980 wrote:
An OPV with hangar for two Sea king could be based on Engadine, but the Zell program was not successful. Weight is another matter.
Sorry, I didn't mean a specific Zell program, but just the general concept. Rockets and a ramp :D
Plus, in regards to weight, an empty weight Sea Harrier is only 14k pounds, while a full weight sea king is 21,000lbs. A full fuel load on the harrier of 5000lbs gives 2000lbs spare for armaments, plenty for guns and sidewinders. Yes, it could only carry a pair of them, but that's not the point of my ridiculous proposal. The point is to do something crazy (and vaguely tactically useful for convoy protection) with 1970's tech.

As for OPV speed... I think the GTC is still thinking convoy escort. So 16 knots is no bad thing.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Thiel
Post subject: Re: John Company - From India to the worldPosted: August 26th, 2014, 7:16 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 5376
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark
Re: Harrier carrier
Ridiculous is certainly the word that comes to mind first :D

Re: OPC
Well, I'd personally prefer it if my escort vessel had enough of a speed advantage over the convoy so that it can manoeuvre back and forth said convoy at a reasonable. Exactly how fast that is depends on the speed of the convoy obviously but I'd say you need at least a 5-10kts speed advantage.

_________________
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
heuhen
Post subject: Re: John Company - From India to the worldPosted: August 26th, 2014, 7:39 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 9102
Joined: December 15th, 2010, 10:13 pm
Location: Behind you, looking at you with my mustache!
this is what Norway used, almost an OPV...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HNoMS_Horten_(A530)


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Trojan
Post subject: Re: John Company - From India to the worldPosted: August 26th, 2014, 10:14 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 1216
Joined: March 26th, 2012, 4:29 am
Location: Big House
Rowdy36 wrote:
Trojan wrote:
Thank you Rowdy. Both ships have FLIRs/Optical Surveillance already mounted on the bridge, do you think it would be best to just replace those with TOPLITE?
Up to you really. From a RAN perspective, the Armidale class patrol boats use Toplite for both search/observation and gun control, whereas the Anzac class frigates use Toplite just for gun control and have a separate system for search/observation. I guess it would come down to how much money you had available, but probably just replacing the current ones would be the best for what these ships will be doing.
Barnets, I feel only two harriers might be two little to be effective, unless many ships were operated. Its a fun idea without a doubt though :D

What about an Atlantic Conveyer style helicopter and Harrier carrier. http://www.shipbucket.com/images.php?di ... 0STUFT.png
Doubles as merchant ship, and blends in with the rest of the fleet in case of attack. Could probably carry a decent number of aircraft too, though managing stores, take-off, and landing could pose quite the problem.

_________________
Projects:
Zealandia AU
John Company AU
References and feedback is always welcome!


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 21 of 22  [ 211 posts ]  Return to “Alternate Universe Designs” | Go to page « 118 19 20 21 22 »

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 59 guests


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]