Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 22 of 45  [ 442 posts ]  Go to page « 120 21 22 23 2445 »
Author Message
eswube
Post subject: Re: Some questions about Ships and WeaponsPosted: July 6th, 2014, 9:46 am
Offline
Posts: 10696
Joined: June 15th, 2011, 8:31 am
Rather yes. At least I can't think of any reasons why Great Britain wouldn't sell Shackletons to Greece.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Blackbuck
Post subject: Re: Some questions about Ships and WeaponsPosted: July 6th, 2014, 9:48 am
Offline
Posts: 2743
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 9:15 am
Location: Birmingham, United Kingdom
Sniped by eswube :(

I don't see why not? There wouldn't be any political reasons not to as far as I know.

_________________
AU Projects: | Banbha et al. | New England: The Divided States
Blood and Fire


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
odysseus1980
Post subject: Re: Some questions about Ships and WeaponsPosted: July 6th, 2014, 9:50 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 3607
Joined: November 8th, 2010, 8:53 am
Location: Athens,Hellenic Kingdom
Contact: Website
And the replacement timeline? SAAF had them 1957-1984, grounded due to embargo.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Blackbuck
Post subject: Re: Some questions about Ships and WeaponsPosted: July 6th, 2014, 11:26 am
Offline
Posts: 2743
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 9:15 am
Location: Birmingham, United Kingdom
Well, we soldiered on with ours until the end of the Cold War so depending on the funding you have available to replace them / operate them I'd say replace them at your leisure.

_________________
AU Projects: | Banbha et al. | New England: The Divided States
Blood and Fire


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
odysseus1980
Post subject: Re: Some questions about Ships and WeaponsPosted: July 6th, 2014, 9:44 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 3607
Joined: November 8th, 2010, 8:53 am
Location: Athens,Hellenic Kingdom
Contact: Website
These Shakletons were similar with SAAF ones and replaced by used P-3B in mid 1980's with used Lockheed P-3B. Latter updated locally as written some pages back.

And something else: In my thread about What if British aircraft I thought an Vickers VC10 AEW with the radar of E-3A. Is this a better solution from the ill fated Nimrod AEW?


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Blackbuck
Post subject: Re: Some questions about Ships and WeaponsPosted: July 6th, 2014, 10:50 pm
Offline
Posts: 2743
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 9:15 am
Location: Birmingham, United Kingdom
There's an even better solution (that I use) Hawkrod!

[ img ]

I went from their various predecessors to Nimrods for MP, ELINT/SIGINT and AEW consolidating a bunch of types into one base airframe. Might be something to look at yourself?

_________________
AU Projects: | Banbha et al. | New England: The Divided States
Blood and Fire


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
odysseus1980
Post subject: Re: Some questions about Ships and WeaponsPosted: July 7th, 2014, 6:11 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 3607
Joined: November 8th, 2010, 8:53 am
Location: Athens,Hellenic Kingdom
Contact: Website
Good solution, the high T-tail of the VC10 would probably interfere too much on the radar. But why real Great Britain throw money on their Nimrod AEW instead of doing this above? Much cheaper and they could have them even from 1970's.

In that thread also I consider using the larger original Trident (powered by triple RR Medway) instead of the smaller Trident (powered by RR Spey). GB would have a direct opponent to B727 with that, avoiding trying fit a fourth boost engine...Wrong politics saw off Queen's Throne. The "Medway Trident" would also provide the frame for MP and AEW.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
RP1
Post subject: Re: Some questions about Ships and WeaponsPosted: July 7th, 2014, 7:19 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 208
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 8:48 pm
Location: Engerlands
Contact: Website
Quote:
But why real Great Britain throw money on their Nimrod AEW instead of doing this above?
Because BRITISH that's why. More seriously, the riskiest option was chosen seemingly because it was the most British in work content, and so supported industry and the industry lobby. This has been a frequent trend in post-war British defence procurement... although sometimes it works out.

RP1

_________________
"Yes siree, the excitement never stops." Togusa, Ghost in the Shell


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
apdsmith
Post subject: Re: Some questions about Ships and WeaponsPosted: July 7th, 2014, 8:11 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 855
Joined: August 29th, 2013, 5:58 pm
Location: Manchester, UK
edit: Yes, I am stupid enough to click the "reply" button instead of the "pm" button...

_________________
Public Service Announcement: This is the preferred SB / FD font.
[ img ]
NSWE: viewtopic.php?f=14&t=5695


Last edited by apdsmith on July 7th, 2014, 10:43 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
[Profile] [Quote]
odysseus1980
Post subject: Re: Some questions about Ships and WeaponsPosted: July 7th, 2014, 10:07 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 3607
Joined: November 8th, 2010, 8:53 am
Location: Athens,Hellenic Kingdom
Contact: Website
PR1 answered to my question, describing exactly the "British Way of thinking".

According to some sources I read, the main problem with Nimrod AEW was how to connect the two radars to work together. So, if consoles worked ok, perhaps they could be connected with the E-3A radar (or Hawkeye radar).


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 22 of 45  [ 442 posts ]  Return to “Off Topic” | Go to page « 120 21 22 23 2445 »

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]