Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 15 of 90  [ 900 posts ]  Go to page « 113 14 15 16 1790 »
Author Message
Ashley
Post subject: Re: Kriegsmarine 1946, second approachPosted: February 7th, 2011, 8:04 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 582
Joined: August 17th, 2010, 7:45 am
Location: Gone to hell
emperor_andreas wrote:
Speaking of Vaterland, how about using the 1940s liner of that name (that was never completed, btw) as a troop transport for the DKM?
Well, you realised my hints about free places, perfect for flak, and the big, mssive doors, capable to let tanks in?
Be sure, the troop transport conversion is coming. ;)

_________________
This is a serious forum. Do not laugh. Do not post nonsens. Do not be kiddish. At least, not all the time.
Current work list:
go on playing dead


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Ashley
Post subject: Vaterland as troop transportPosted: February 7th, 2011, 3:06 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 582
Joined: August 17th, 2010, 7:45 am
Location: Gone to hell
For the 1946 invasion the Vaterland was converted to a troop transport.
[ img ]

_________________
This is a serious forum. Do not laugh. Do not post nonsens. Do not be kiddish. At least, not all the time.
Current work list:
go on playing dead


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Novice
Post subject: Re: Kriegsmarine 1946, second approachPosted: February 7th, 2011, 5:47 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 4126
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 5:25 am
Location: Vrijstaat
Nice ship, but converting a passenger-liner into a troopship, is best seen in pictures of USS America as liner and troopship

[ img ] troopship

[ img ] liner

_________________
[ img ] Thank you Kim for the crest

"Never fear to try on something new. Remember that the Titanic was built by professionals, and the Ark by an amateur"


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Portsmouth Bill
Post subject: Re: Kriegsmarine 1946, second approachPosted: February 7th, 2011, 6:39 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 3220
Joined: August 16th, 2010, 7:45 am
Location: Cambridge United Kingdom
I beleive there may be a confusion here; with other liners used as troop transports the practice was not to use them to disembark on the beachead or under fire; instead transfering to smaller ships. Here, we have a large ship bristling with weapons and sophisticated radars etc. even tanks and aircraft, and its role is limited to the English channel; it just seems to go against every other application of amphibious operations.

But hang on! its AU, right?


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Ashley
Post subject: Re: Kriegsmarine 1946, second approachPosted: February 7th, 2011, 7:52 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 582
Joined: August 17th, 2010, 7:45 am
Location: Gone to hell
Mostly correct, Bill.

It's to carry troops & vehicle & stuff to a secured harbour. It was built as an ocean liner with the option to get converted to a troop transport. Therefor were places left for the installation of arms & directors & and all that stuff. Deck 3 is high & strong enough to carry even battle tanks. This ship is no usual ocean liner, it is made to look like that until conversion into its real task.

There will be a third version for afterwar duties.

_________________
This is a serious forum. Do not laugh. Do not post nonsens. Do not be kiddish. At least, not all the time.
Current work list:
go on playing dead


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
emperor_andreas
Post subject: Re: Kriegsmarine 1946, second approachPosted: February 8th, 2011, 5:43 am
Offline
Posts: 3910
Joined: November 17th, 2010, 8:03 am
Location: Corinth, MS USA
Contact: YouTube
Nice work, but the Vaterland I was referring to was much bigger. She was launched in 1940, but was destroyed by bombs in 1943, finally being scrapped in 1948. I've only seen two pics of a model to show how she would've looked as completed.

-Matt

_________________
[ img ]
MS State Guard - 08 March 2014 - 28 January 2023

The Official IJN Ships & Planes List

#FJB


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Portsmouth Bill
Post subject: Re: Kriegsmarine 1946, second approachPosted: February 8th, 2011, 8:19 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 3220
Joined: August 16th, 2010, 7:45 am
Location: Cambridge United Kingdom
Quote:
It's to carry troops & vehicle & stuff to a secured harbour. It was built as an ocean liner with the option to get converted to a troop transport. Therefor were places left for the installation of arms & directors & and all that stuff. Deck 3 is high & strong enough to carry even battle tanks. This ship is no usual ocean liner, it is made to look like that until conversion into its real task.
That's ok; but (and I know its nit picking), if the harbours are secured, presumably after the actions to secure them, then why bother with all that weaponry? Anyway, Its an attractive design and still light years ahead of a lot of AU stuff I've been seeing lately. :)


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Ashley
Post subject: Re: Kriegsmarine 1946, second approachPosted: February 8th, 2011, 8:31 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 582
Joined: August 17th, 2010, 7:45 am
Location: Gone to hell
@Matt: Yes, you referred to Vaterland 2. I wasn't able to find usable data about that ship, just it was launched in emergency action in 1940 (bombing raid?) and scrapped 1948. An unsure record says 824" and 41.000 tons. A single picture at Blohm & Voss and this model photo:
[ img ]
Have you got any more?

@Bill: the same reason why even civil cargo transports were armed. Air Force bombers don't ask, they shoot and sink their targets, if they wear the wrong flag. Even the red cross is no all time protection against loads of ammo. So any ship being a part of task forces was armed. Required ocean liners down to the smallest LSIs.
And the AU-Vaterland was built for action.

_________________
This is a serious forum. Do not laugh. Do not post nonsens. Do not be kiddish. At least, not all the time.
Current work list:
go on playing dead


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Ashley
Post subject: Vaterland 1947 as auxilary cruiserPosted: February 8th, 2011, 1:21 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 582
Joined: August 17th, 2010, 7:45 am
Location: Gone to hell
1947 after the sudden fall of the UK homeland, the Kriegsmarine was faced with the ruins of the big empire the UK was, with no chance to control it. Dozens of ships were hastily converted into aux cruisers, including the Vaterland. While she was a warship at core, others were simply armed freighters.
Here comes Vaterland on World Peace Tour...
[ img ]

_________________
This is a serious forum. Do not laugh. Do not post nonsens. Do not be kiddish. At least, not all the time.
Current work list:
go on playing dead


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Ashley
Post subject: Re: Kriegsmarine 1946, second approachPosted: February 8th, 2011, 1:35 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 582
Joined: August 17th, 2010, 7:45 am
Location: Gone to hell
It's all camo! The Vaterland now wears 3 6"-lightweight-turrets and the vehicle deck is reduced by chambers for four torpedo launchers and stores. The 6"-twins are the same as on the 1936-destroyer class, so the Vaterland really can carry them. The catapults are replaced by enlarged deckspace for some Weserflug VTOLs. Beefed up that way she was sent to several colonies in order to disarm the british troops there. As expected that disarming was mostly a less peaceful job. Dozens of Royal Navy crews didn't accept the situation and fled to Canada or Australia. Some were detained were the were, some changed their flag to the jolly roger. The Vaterland and her batallion managed that in a great manor until she surprisingly met the well hidden HMS Anson. Not able to flee or to fight the battleship Vaterland was sunk near Singapor. HMS Anson escaped to Australia.

[ img ]
I know, it's very AU...

_________________
This is a serious forum. Do not laugh. Do not post nonsens. Do not be kiddish. At least, not all the time.
Current work list:
go on playing dead


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 15 of 90  [ 900 posts ]  Return to “Alternate Universe Designs” | Go to page « 113 14 15 16 1790 »

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]