Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 3 of 3  [ 24 posts ]  Go to page « 1 2 3
Author Message
acelanceloet
Post subject: Re: looking for artist for joint project(s)Posted: June 20th, 2014, 12:16 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 7510
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands
look up the KDX program and the Dokdo Class from south korea. all relatively new ships with at least one goalkeeper on board.
the dutch production line is closed however, due to the fact that there are other systems on the market which can do the job about as good for 1/5th of the price (which is why the RN switched from goalkeeper to phalanx in recent ships, there is something as good enough and the impact on cost and design is lower) south korea seems to have an production line open still. due to the lower amount of ships the dutch navy has enough goalkeepers in store to equip new ships with them, and upgrades the mountings for that reason instead of replacing them.

note also that the other systems (except phalanx) are all dual purpose systems IIRC, which became increasingly popular post cold war.
phalanx is still used on quite a few new ships (note for example the type 45 destroyers of the RN) while it is, if possible, even less stealthy then the goalkeeper.

_________________
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
shippy2013
Post subject: Re: looking for artist for joint project(s)Posted: June 20th, 2014, 12:32 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 658
Joined: March 26th, 2013, 7:44 pm
Location: Nottingham. United Kingdom
Another reason for phalanx drop in sales is in part due to its own design. Being a plug and play system as such with most upgrades software based units are reused from old ships on newer vessels.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
lordarpad
Post subject: Re: looking for artist for joint project(s)Posted: June 23rd, 2014, 8:19 am
Offline
Posts: 9
Joined: June 19th, 2014, 8:05 am
bezobrazov wrote:
Ace, I know that; however, would even a United European Navy really need a precise equivalent of the hugely expensive Burkes? I know, as a former EU-taxpayer, I'd not be willing to pay up for such needless extravagance. I wanted to emphasize the more economic designs that have prevailed in Europe, especially the Iver Huitfeldts. Those could possibly be a mainstay of such future navy organization.
What I was really looking for was something that was an actually standardised design for an EUN with central admin and procurement (which means buying the same kit and saving money that way) and something that can do global deployments easily. A lot of our current designs can't. The RN is best at building designs at the high end with global deployment capability. My thinking was to learn from the different design strengths of the different navies and mix and match.

And the idea that building a bigger batch of ships, using the same equipment will bring unit price down and will allow us to go with more capable platforms, ie "global cruisers".

The strengths I want to use are:

RN - global deployment and high end kit
MN and MM - artillery and point defence
Deutsche Marine - resilient design - 2 islands and 3 box girders


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
lordarpad
Post subject: Re: looking for artist for joint project(s)Posted: June 23rd, 2014, 8:29 am
Offline
Posts: 9
Joined: June 19th, 2014, 8:05 am
Karle94 wrote:
Wall of lead doesnt work, say that to the thousands of planes shot down by USN ships in the Pacific.
ISTR reading something that that was mostly the 40mm and above guns, whereas the 20mms didn't do all that much. But maybe we should split this out into a separate discussion :)


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 3 of 3  [ 24 posts ]  Return to “General Discussion” | Go to page « 1 2 3

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 31 guests


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]