Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 18 of 123  [ 1226 posts ]  Go to page « 116 17 18 19 20123 »
Author Message
Thiel
Post subject: Re: Planebucket Discussion ThreadPosted: February 3rd, 2011, 2:55 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 5376
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark
Rather than using light grey for the rotors which looks hideous, I'd go with single width black instead.

_________________
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
KimWerner
Post subject: Re: Planebucket Discussion ThreadPosted: February 3rd, 2011, 4:37 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2195
Joined: December 22nd, 2010, 12:13 pm
Location: Denmark
Little Bird wrote:
:mrgreen: Ooh! I've could save some hours of working if I'd knew this site. It gives me great pleasure to look at all these variants of AW-101/EH-101 and I'm also satisfied, that my own drawing is very simular to the UK's! But!!! When I compare (both with pictures and drawings) I'll think my drawing is slightly more correct, especially with the main rotor, but also in details with the landing wheels canopy and search radar etc. Thiel had suggested the side rotor shown with a single black circle (which diameter is exact 4 m). I can see that is the standard, so I'll correct that :D

_________________
Work in progress:
DD County Class PNS Babur (1982)(PAK)
FF Type 21 Class D182 PNS Babur (2000)(PAK)
All relevant Coat of Arms


Last edited by KimWerner on February 3rd, 2011, 5:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
[Profile] [Quote]
acelanceloet
Post subject: Re: Planebucket Discussion ThreadPosted: February 3rd, 2011, 4:43 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 7510
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands
I doubt it. in the one on the old forums went days of work from 2 experienced members. yours looks kinda weird, and kinda bad compared to that one.

_________________
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
KimWerner
Post subject: Re: Planebucket Discussion ThreadPosted: February 3rd, 2011, 5:10 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2195
Joined: December 22nd, 2010, 12:13 pm
Location: Denmark
acelanceloet wrote:
I doubt it. in the one on the old forums went days of work from 2 experienced members. yours looks kinda weird, and kinda bad compared to that one.
That's all right, but if 10 m are 65 pix then 22,8 m are 148-149 pix. I've really measured the Merlin out, because I know you are a very skilled judge :) That's the reason why I have the "pixel-box" in red on my drawing. It makes it easier to count :D

_________________
Work in progress:
DD County Class PNS Babur (1982)(PAK)
FF Type 21 Class D182 PNS Babur (2000)(PAK)
All relevant Coat of Arms


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
TimothyC
Post subject: Re: Planebucket Discussion ThreadPosted: February 3rd, 2011, 10:15 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 3765
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:06 am
Contact: Website
KimWerner wrote:
acelanceloet wrote:
I doubt it. in the one on the old forums went days of work from 2 experienced members. yours looks kinda weird, and kinda bad compared to that one.
That's all right, but if 10 m are 65 pix then 22,8 m are 148-149 pix. I've really measured the Merlin out, because I know you are a very skilled judge :) That's the reason why I have the "pixel-box" in red on my drawing. It makes it easier to count :D

My question is this: what is the dimension you are working off of, and are you sure that you have it correct?

We had a recent 'incident' with the H-60 length which was solved by going to Jane's and checking the various lengths that were delineated there.

_________________
𝐌𝐀𝐓𝐇𝐍𝐄𝐓- 𝑻𝒐 𝑪𝒐𝒈𝒊𝒕𝒂𝒕𝒆 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒕𝒐 𝑺𝒐𝒍𝒗𝒆


Last edited by TimothyC on February 3rd, 2011, 11:22 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
[Profile] [Quote]
klagldsf
Post subject: Re: Planebucket Discussion ThreadPosted: February 3rd, 2011, 10:31 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2765
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 4:14 pm
TimothyC wrote:
We had a recent 'incident' with the H-60 length which was solved by going to Jane's and checking the various lengths that were delineated there.
We should sticky that as a reminder. And this is also why you only scale a ship off of other objects only when it's the only option.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
KimWerner
Post subject: Re: Planebucket Discussion ThreadPosted: February 6th, 2011, 6:26 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2195
Joined: December 22nd, 2010, 12:13 pm
Location: Denmark
TimothyC wrote:
KimWerner wrote:
acelanceloet wrote:
I doubt it. in the one on the old forums went days of work from 2 experienced members. yours looks kinda weird, and kinda bad compared to that one.
That's all right, but if 10 m are 65 pix then 22,8 m are 148-149 pix. I've really measured the Merlin out, because I know you are a very skilled judge :) That's the reason why I have the "pixel-box" in red on my drawing. It makes it easier to count :D

My question is this: what is the dimension you are working off of, and are you sure that you have it correct?

We had a recent 'incident' with the H-60 length which was solved by going to Jane's and checking the various lengths that were delineated there.
I'm using the dimensions from AW: Overall length 22,8 m (= 148-149 pix), tailrotor diameter 4 m (= 26 pix) total hight o wheel 7 m (= 45-46 pix) etc. :geek:

_________________
Work in progress:
DD County Class PNS Babur (1982)(PAK)
FF Type 21 Class D182 PNS Babur (2000)(PAK)
All relevant Coat of Arms


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Little Bird
Post subject: Re: Planebucket Discussion ThreadPosted: February 8th, 2011, 12:36 pm
Offline
Posts: 262
Joined: August 25th, 2010, 1:01 pm
Location: Italy
Contact: Website
I have upgrade the old AW101 because effectively too much large:

[ img ]


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
paul_541
Post subject: Re: Planebucket Discussion ThreadPosted: February 8th, 2011, 6:58 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 395
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 2:58 pm
Location: Quebec, Canada
Good work Little Bird ! :shock: ;)

Greetings. ;)

_________________
My motto:Per ardua ad astra (RCAF)
Current Drawings:
USS Midway CVB-41 and later alterations
HMCS Bonaventure CVL-22 and later alterations
Paul 2024


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Novice
Post subject: Re: PlanebucketPosted: February 15th, 2011, 5:39 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 4126
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 5:25 am
Location: Vrijstaat
WhyMe wrote:
Kawanishi E7K spotter floatplane
[ img ]
Can you re-post it with white background, and not transparent, for those of us who use MS-Paint?

_________________
[ img ] Thank you Kim for the crest

"Never fear to try on something new. Remember that the Titanic was built by professionals, and the Ark by an amateur"


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 18 of 123  [ 1226 posts ]  Return to “Parts Sheets Discussion” | Go to page « 116 17 18 19 20123 »

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]