Shipbucket

Lightning the good photo of Bulwark's starboard side, I've managed to recognise several doors and other details. I think she now is nearly finished
In parts sheets discussion we have a discussion about the drawing of LCVP Mk. 5, so it's not necessary to comment at them. When the final result of this discussion is conclude, I will fix that item

_________________
Work in progress:
DD County Class PNS Babur (1982)(PAK)
FF Type 21 Class D182 PNS Babur (2000)(PAK)
All relevant Coat of Arms

I miss a few details on the top part of the crane, some shading on the masts and the holes in the stern look kinda empty..... also, why are there different doors midships then there are on the rest of the ship?
you have fixed the bow perfect, but I am wondering.... shouldn't there be more flight deck railing?
also, the shading you have now is not up to shipbucket standard. you will have to use the original shadin way or the two toned new way.
please recolour the weapons the same colour as the ship itself, or are the goalkeepers darker in reality?

other then that, you've done a good job and after a few fixes it is finished IMO.

_________________
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin

I'm a little bit confused over the crane. You miss a few details, but when I look on the photos I can't find more, than I've already drawn?
The doors midships are significant bigger in reality. Why, I don't no! But I thought I had to show it.
I will correct the shading
The goalkeepers has same colour as the hull in reality too!
You're right about the rails. I don't know what happened, but some of the rails are vanished I will manage to put them on again

_________________
Work in progress:
DD County Class PNS Babur (1982)(PAK)
FF Type 21 Class D182 PNS Babur (2000)(PAK)
All relevant Coat of Arms

well, the upper part of the crane is shaped different. you should show this. it's not like there is some hole in it or something, as you've shown it now (with the grey)
the goalkeepers are most likely the same colour as the structure, but I could be wrong about that.
and the doors should be closed on top, as they do not last to the deck above as far as I can see.
one I missed: the holes in the hull should be outlined in black, and some of them might be windows.

_________________
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin

I'm still confused. I've added a photo of the crane, because I'm sure I really got the right details

_________________
Work in progress:
DD County Class PNS Babur (1982)(PAK)
FF Type 21 Class D182 PNS Babur (2000)(PAK)
All relevant Coat of Arms

This is how I would do it:

_________________
𝐌𝐀𝐓𝐇𝐍𝐄𝐓- 𝑻𝒐 𝑪𝒐𝒈𝒊𝒕𝒂𝒕𝒆 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒕𝒐 𝑺𝒐𝒍𝒗𝒆

Except the crane, various small details
The devil were in the details

You will find a combined arms badge here.
http://www.shipbucket.com/images.php?dir=Real Designs/Great Britain/CVCentaurClassBulwark1959.png

Most of these discrepancies I do not understand.

Using a picture of a different angle does not make sense.

The problem, as I see it, is that all in this discussion now focus on this particular photo (above). I haven't used this photo to made the most of my draft of HMS Bulwark! The only reason this photo is good for the drawing purpose is, that is possible to get a look into the gaps at the superstructure. Because the angle is a bit from front it's also tricking. You can see things and details you would not see in the direct angle, and something you can see in the direct angle you can't see here. For example the shaping of the rear!

_________________
Work in progress:
DD County Class PNS Babur (1982)(PAK)
FF Type 21 Class D182 PNS Babur (2000)(PAK)
All relevant Coat of Arms