I cant recall that case but Back then I recall we didn't have lots of historical ships drawn and the railing issue was almost exclusively focused on scandinavian camoflage patterns. And the instance we are (hopefully both) talking about is when the railing doesen't face any structure with its distinquised paint behind, but when it faces the open air, or the blank white surface?
Yes we do, but what I am emphasizing is the fact that, in this instance, the USS Connecticut (BB-18), she had, when completed, her railings all in buff color with a fire proofed dark mahogany top. This simply cannot - should not be simplified the way you suggest. First of all, it
will make an otherwise terrific drawing look rather spoiled and unreal for that matter.
In such case I still retain the point that what ever color that railing is, in the distance you would look it as presented by the SB scale, you could not determen its color, only that its darker than the sky behind it. Thus grey since sky is always white in SB sheets
Against the background this works as same way, since the distance. Only alternation would be if the railings would deliberatly be made from lot ligther color (eg pure white) and shown against very dark shade (Like in case some older Indian Navy vessels in 80's), then would one need to adjust some sort of compromise color of that railings true color.
I beg for forgivness, but this statement doesn't make much sense. We
are to make an exception when something's whiter than SB-standard, but adamantly
refuse it for objects actually darker - and most importantly - a wholly different shade than our "standard" railings. I still maintain, in order for SB to retain its huge credibility, we need to apply the accurate colors, regardless if it's a railing section or superstructure or hull!
To Mr. Latuch: I'm sorry if I inadvertently initiated a lengthy discussion about this topic and caused your topic to be derailed. I apologize for that!