Here's one possible down-armed configuration. The single 20mm replaces the twin .50s on the helideck rear, the RAM is moved to the front and made wartime-only, and a crane is added where the 20mm gun was.
Edit: crane colour fixed
_________________ Worklist:
FFG Halifax Redraw
Last edited by Charwhick on March 22nd, 2014, 9:51 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Posts:2936 Joined: July 26th, 2010, 11:38 pm
Location: Midwest US
I believe SPQ-9B is sufficient, if not ideal, for all of your needs. I don't really like the 20mm right aft as currently arranged; if you're going to block the helo deck, you might as well block it with something a lot more useful.
Posts:7510 Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands
the holland class OPV's, which are a bit larger, have an 76, an 30mm, and 2 .50's. basically, this arrangement. maybe that ship is a bit large for it's load, but it is something to keep in mind. it has 3 of the 4 weapons forward though.
keeping that in mind......
what about placing the crane on the current position (but an a bit larger one, maybe foldable, which can service the helideck and over the sides), the .50's at the side of it, and the 20 mm forward. in the wartime config, the 20 mm can be replaced by the RAM. you don't need an 'coastguard' 20mm if you are at war. otherwise, if you loose the OPV role, you might loose the crane for the RAM. that gives you 360 degrees coverage against AA.
_________________ Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new. Shipbucket Wiki admin
Posts:5376 Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark
I'd put a crane on each side and the 20mm on the raised bit in the middle. In wartime you'd replace it with a RAM launcher for all round AA cover.
_________________ “Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error
Posts:5376 Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark
Charwhick wrote:
What do you mean by "on each side"? You mean alongside the superstructure
Yes.
_________________ “Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error
I honestly prefer the crane-rear version, and I'll certainly look for a bigger crane on the sheets (or maybe another ship if none fit); but I'm not at home for the next week. Which means not having the .pdn file whoch means no layers, which means annoying editing. I might however start the larger ship. If I wanted a pseudo-frigate with ESSM ans a hangar, what length would I look at?