I like this, but I think the previous version still has potential.
What if you swap the amidships VLS and the hanger and landing pad? The midships location is better for helo operations and having the VLS aft eliminates interference with the engine room. I think it would also help the aft freeboard.
I recommend keeping the strike length VLS. To my knowledge, the USN has never used any of the shorter lengths, except maybe the self defense cells on the Ford.
Thank you ghost, I'm not going to with the mid-ship helo pad for this ship. I tried it out and I like this look better. I have thought about the strike length VLS and decided there is no good reason not to have it. I can still load a non strike load out in it, but also ad strike if the mission calls for it.
The USN has also never had a combatant which, if I may say so, is quite so schizophrenic in role and purpose.
Thank you Erik, but my ship does NOT hear voices in its head....and I'll leave it at that until you explain that a little more
here's the latest. Not sure I'm 100% happy yet but I'm getting there
All comments and suggestions welcome