Shipbucket

After reading lots of threads in the forum Congress has been persuaded to fund a 21st century battleship because we might need 16 inch guns to sink the atomic space battleship Yamato.
The Navy wants to build the cheapest thing with 16inch guns, so we can spend the rest of the cash on something useful, we give you BM1 the thing nobody wants but gets built anyway ( and yes the reactor got cut and RAM is all the missiles remaining but I’m sure the brochure still has super and multi purpose in it ! ).



I’m not sure I like the style of 21st century stealth ships (to much of the important stuff like electronics is hidden) please tell me if I have made to many errors with the systems on this one, or if I’m not allowed 2 threads etc (but didn’t want this one to muck up my real interest).
thanks JSB

you have no chance of battling space battleship yamato without the wave motion gun, you get that right?

_________________
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin

if you want this nuclear missile battleship to look like one you must put a VLS for the missiles and put the missiles on the drawing. Here are my suggestions for missiles to arm the ship:

You're probably going to need something rather bigger since you're aiming for potentially high orbits

_________________
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.

How do you "sink" a space ship? Nice drawing btw

EMRG @ 300 MJ should achieve earth orbit with suffcient velocity excess to cause kenetic damage to starship hulls. YOLO!

Congress was not amused.....



JSB

Haha!

_________________

Jabba's Worklist

JSB you have an issue with your creditting. It's general in your different topic - wonder why no one had mentioned it - the vessel itself is creditted in one parantesis - (name 1, name 2 etc.) - with the original artist mentioned first. As for the CoA it's the same though "by courtesy" isn't neccessary especially because it ought to have some communication between the two drawers first. I'm not very fond of the quality of the changing of my original seal though I can't and won't forbid it. But it's not with my courtesy

_________________
Work in progress:
DD County Class PNS Babur (1982)(PAK)
FF Type 21 Class D182 PNS Babur (2000)(PAK)
All relevant Coat of Arms

Thanks for the tip with crediting didn't really understand what CoA ment so I just copied it (or realise about the 1,2,3 thing).
I will get on fixing all my posts, I you really don’t like my messing up your badge please tell me and I will delete it (especially as this ship is really just a silly joke).
Thanks JSB