Posts:7510 Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands
uhm...... WTF! I don't know what it is, but something seems not right about this design.....
and PLEASE do some something about that filled up deck. yes I know it is that full in reality (and it can get much worse) but it makes no sense doing so on an shipbucket drawing IMO.... but that is not needed, your opinion, I only know I can't look at the ship because of the aircraft.
_________________ Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new. Shipbucket Wiki admin
acelanceloet, tu as toujours des critiques de gout qui s'apparente à l'aspect technique.
Je suis militaire et je sais ce qui est possible ou pas!
J'aime l'aspect visionnaire sans trop exagérer et construire un navire de combat , il faudrait qu'il soit quand même bien armé!
Quand je vois les FREMM européennes ça me fait doucement rire! Je ne parle pas du CVN Charles de Gaulle , je le trouve un peu léger et je ne vois pas l'utilité qu'il soit nucéarisé justement!
C'est pour ça que je dévelope des système mieux armés.
Posts:7510 Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands
- off topic: NO THE FRENCH ARE TAKING OVER THIS FORUM! on topic -
as my french is as rusty as possible ( the 3 three years of french lessons have dissapeared from my mind mostly) I cannot make out what you are trying to say. so please say it in english (even use an translator if needed) as my english is bad enough already.
_________________ Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new. Shipbucket Wiki admin