» »

Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 1 of 1  [ 10 posts ] 
[Print view]
Author Message
mirage2000
Post subject: Submarine RaidersPosted: January 19th, 2011, 8:50 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 111
Joined: December 31st, 2010, 4:19 pm
my submarine for raids, attacks or harassment of convoys. Maybe a lame duck ;) , but I like the style with the turret of 40mm and the Mistral AA retractable missile on the back!

[ img ]

Uploaded with ImageShack.us
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Mitchell van Os
Post subject: Re: Submarine RaidersPosted: January 19th, 2011, 8:56 pm
Offline
Posts: 1056
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 5:19 pm
You sure this kind of weirdness is a never build ship but designed for a navy?

_________________
Fryssian AU with Lt.Maverick 114
viewtopic.php?f=14&t=9802&p=193331#p193331
[ img ]
Embarked on: HNLMS Karel Doorman A833
To do list:
-Zeven Provincien class cruiser
-Joint support ship all sides
-F124 Sachsen class frigate
-F125 Baden-Württemberg class frigate
-Clemencau class aircraft carrier
-Zeven provincien class frigate
-Poolster class AOR
-Amsterdam class AOR
-Minas Gerais aircraft carrier
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Novice
Post subject: Re: Submarine RaidersPosted: January 19th, 2011, 9:09 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 4126
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 5:25 am
Location: Vrijstaat
mirage2000 wrote:
my submarine for raids, attacks or harassment of convoys. Maybe a lame duck ;) , but I like the style with the turret of 40mm and the Mistral AA retractable missile on the back!
Says it all. It should be in Personal Designs

_________________
[ img ] Thank you Kim for the crest

"Never fear to try on something new. Remember that the Titanic was built by professionals, and the Ark by an amateur"
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
mirage2000
Post subject: Re: Submarine RaidersPosted: January 19th, 2011, 9:12 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 111
Joined: December 31st, 2010, 4:19 pm
MitcheLL300 wrote:
You sure this kind of weirdness is a never build ship but designed for a navy?
I know the French submarine "Surcouf" of World War II with its two big guns of 203mm.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/French_sub ... uf_(N_N_3)

But the turret, if it is clogged, could do the trick. Anyway, before 1950, most of the submarine had a gun on the deck, except that it is in the turret!

But we can always dream! ;)

(sorry for my bad english, I use google translate)
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Novice
Post subject: Re: Submarine RaidersPosted: January 19th, 2011, 9:35 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 4126
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 5:25 am
Location: Vrijstaat
mirage2000 wrote:
MitcheLL300 wrote:
You sure this kind of weirdness is a never build ship but designed for a navy?
I know the French submarine "Surcouf" of World War II with its two big guns of 203mm.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/French_sub ... uf_(N_N_3)

But the turret, if it is clogged, could do the trick. Anyway, before 1950, most of the submarine had a gun on the deck, except that it is in the turret!

But we can always dream! ;)

(sorry for my bad english, I use google translate)
Surcouf was done see here

_________________
[ img ] Thank you Kim for the crest

"Never fear to try on something new. Remember that the Titanic was built by professionals, and the Ark by an amateur"
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
mirage2000
Post subject: Re: Submarine RaidersPosted: January 19th, 2011, 10:08 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 111
Joined: December 31st, 2010, 4:19 pm
Wow, wow, woooow!... Wonderfull!

Thanks Novice, I like it!...
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
klagldsf
Post subject: Re: Submarine RaidersPosted: January 19th, 2011, 11:57 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2765
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 4:14 pm
mirage2000 wrote:
MitcheLL300 wrote:
You sure this kind of weirdness is a never build ship but designed for a navy?
I know the French submarine "Surcouf" of World War II with its two big guns of 203mm.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/French_sub ... uf_(N_N_3)

But the turret, if it is clogged, could do the trick. Anyway, before 1950, most of the submarine had a gun on the deck, except that it is in the turret!

But we can always dream! ;)

(sorry for my bad english, I use google translate)
State awareness of past precedent that justifies design decision

Link to precedent on Wikipedia

State justification for design decision through precedent without ability to understand how precedent relates (or does not relate) to design decision, or how infeasible or militarily unwise design decision is

Other rationalization goes here


That is the format of the average newbie Shipbucket post.
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
erik_t
Post subject: Re: Submarine RaidersPosted: January 20th, 2011, 5:15 am
Offline
Posts: 2936
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 11:38 pm
Location: Midwest US
Kapow!
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
mirage2000
Post subject: Re: Submarine RaidersPosted: January 20th, 2011, 4:49 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 111
Joined: December 31st, 2010, 4:19 pm
Thanks for moving my picture on the GOOD forum!...

My error!
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Raven
Post subject: Re: Submarine RaidersPosted: January 20th, 2011, 7:15 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 107
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 6:30 am
Location: San Diego, Ca.
Contact: Website, Yahoo Messenger
No problem hearing that sucker coming...

_________________
In Hoc Signo Vinces

By This Sign You Will Conquer
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 1 of 1  [ 10 posts ]  Return to “Beginners Only”

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 30 guests

The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]