Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 1 of 1  [ 7 posts ] 
Author Message
Novice
Post subject: Type 16 versionsPosted: January 18th, 2011, 8:41 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 4126
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 5:25 am
Location: Vrijstaat
During the 1950's the RN modified some old destroyers as frigates, Type 15 were elaborate conversions and so expensive. A need for a cheaper version arose, resulting in Type 16.
The South African had taken the idea and converted the 'W' class destroyer Simon van der Stel (formerly HMS Whelp), in somewhat modified fashion giving the destroyer a wide hangar with two Wasp helicopters, and replaced the old DCT III type fire control system with an Italian system
The result is as follows

[ img ]

_________________
[ img ] Thank you Kim for the crest

"Never fear to try on something new. Remember that the Titanic was built by professionals, and the Ark by an amateur"


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Thiel
Post subject: Re: Type 16 versionsPosted: January 18th, 2011, 9:46 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 5376
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark
Just a minor nitpick, but shouldn't the text read D237 Simon van der Stel rather than SAN Simon van der Stel?

_________________
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Novice
Post subject: Re: Type 16 versionsPosted: January 18th, 2011, 9:50 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 4126
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 5:25 am
Location: Vrijstaat
Thiel wrote:
Just a minor nitpick, but shouldn't the text read D237 Simon van der Stel rather than SAN Simon van der Stel?
You miay be right Thiel.

_________________
[ img ] Thank you Kim for the crest

"Never fear to try on something new. Remember that the Titanic was built by professionals, and the Ark by an amateur"


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Portsmouth Bill
Post subject: Re: Type 16 versionsPosted: January 19th, 2011, 12:28 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 3220
Joined: August 16th, 2010, 7:45 am
Location: Cambridge United Kingdom
Excellent cover of a little known warship :D Plaudits aside only a couple of queries: I thought it was SAS and not SAN? Also, I've looked at photo's and I just can't see how they could fit two Wasps into that hangar :(


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
ALVAMA
Post subject: Re: Type 16 versionsPosted: January 19th, 2011, 7:20 pm
Excellent


Top
[Quote]
Novice
Post subject: Re: Type 16 versionsPosted: January 19th, 2011, 8:37 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 4126
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 5:25 am
Location: Vrijstaat
Portsmouth Bill wrote:
Excellent cover of a little known warship :D Plaudits aside only a couple of queries: I thought it was SAS and not SAN? Also, I've looked at photo's and I just can't see how they could fit two Wasps into that hangar :(
SAN is South African Navy, SAS South African Ship (or Scandinavian Air Service :D )
The hangar was wide (30ft), so two folded Wasps are narrow enough, the hull width being 8ft 8in (2.64 m), so it could fit.

_________________
[ img ] Thank you Kim for the crest

"Never fear to try on something new. Remember that the Titanic was built by professionals, and the Ark by an amateur"


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Portsmouth Bill
Post subject: Re: Type 16 versionsPosted: January 24th, 2011, 5:09 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 3220
Joined: August 16th, 2010, 7:45 am
Location: Cambridge United Kingdom
I'll take your word for it :) But blimey, did they use Vaseline as well :P


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 1 of 1  [ 7 posts ]  Return to “Real Designs”

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 34 guests


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]