Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 6 of 76  [ 752 posts ]  Go to page « 14 5 6 7 876 »
Author Message
sebu
Post subject: Re: Independent Federation of Australia AUPosted: December 27th, 2013, 8:21 am
Offline
Posts: 646
Joined: August 18th, 2010, 9:18 am
Awesome!


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Thiel
Post subject: Re: Independent Federation of Australia AUPosted: December 27th, 2013, 8:55 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 5376
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark
A minor quibble, the Dog-Dish antenna can't look straight up. I realise this isn't going to be an issue in most of its patrol area, but it's worth thinking about. I'd also enlarge the line handling hatches in the bow. They are rather on the small size as it stands.

_________________
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
LEUT_East
Post subject: Re: Independent Federation of Australia AUPosted: December 27th, 2013, 9:58 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 923
Joined: December 29th, 2011, 7:27 am
Location: Queensland, Australia
Independent Federation of Australia Coast Guard

[ img ]

Having 19,650 kilometres of coastline, Australia relies heavily on the Independent Federation of Australia Coast Guard (IFACG) force to defend its coast. It's duties include border protection, search and rescue, enforcement of maritime law, safety of vessels and support of Independent Federation of Australia Navy (IFAN) operations in the littoral theatre.

In addition, there are several private volunteer coast guard organizations, the two largest organizations being the Australian Volunteer Coastal Patrol (established in 1937) and the Australian Volunteer Coast Guard (established in 1961). These volunteer organizations have no law enforcement powers, and are essentially auxiliary Search and Rescue services.

The IFACG was originally the Patrol Boat Force Element Group (FEG) of the IFAN until transfer to the new portfolio in 1995. The National Headquarters is located in Canberra with the regional state bases being:

- IFACG Base Rockhampton, Queensland
- IFACG Base Weipa, Queensland
- IFACG Base Coffs Harbour, New South Wales
- IFACG Base Bega, New South Wales
- IFACG Base Port Melbourne, Victoria
- IFACG Base Hobart, Tasmania
- IFACG Base Port Adelaide, South Australia
- IFACG Base Geraldton, Western Australia
- IFACG Base Christmas Island
- IFACG Base Darwin, Northern Australia

IFACG Australian Aerospace Jetstream 31EZ aircraft carry out the bulk of aerial maritime surveillance but the aerial fleet also includes specialised fixed-wing patrol aircraft and helicopters undertaking electronic and visual surveillance of Australia's coastline and offshore maritime areas. All IFACG aircraft are based and maintained at Independent Federation of Australia Air Force (IFAAF) Depots.

_________________
There is no "I" in TEAM but there is a ME

[ img ]
______________________
Current Worklist:
Redrawing my entire AU after a long absence from Shipbucket


Last edited by LEUT_East on December 30th, 2013, 4:30 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
[Profile] [Quote]
MihoshiK
Post subject: Re: Independent Federation of Australia AUPosted: December 27th, 2013, 10:57 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 1035
Joined: October 16th, 2010, 11:06 pm
Location: In orbit, watching you draw.
Contact: Website
LEUT_East wrote:
MihoshiK wrote:
Allright, guidance radar critisisms: Your Rockhampton class. Why does it have the SPG-62 when it's also CEAFAR and CEAMOUNT equipped?

Likewise, your Castlemain class could do with (enlarged/trainable) versions of the CEAMOUNT instead of SPG-62. There's no reason to pick two completely different illumination systems for your air warfare ships, especially not on the same ship!
Yeh, that was in the back of my mind. The Rockhamptons and Castlemaines are being upgraded in the future and part of the upgrade will be the removal of the AN/SPG-62 mounts and the inclusion of CEAMOUNT units on the Castlemaine Class. The main reason I put the AN/SPG-62 mounts on the Rockhampton Class was as a redundancy measure. Looking back at that now, it maybe wasn't such a good idea.

Thanks for the feedback mate :)
Another remark: Why replace the aft MK-62 on your Brisbane with a MK-95? The MK-62 is considerably longer ranged, and can still guide the Sea Sparrow. With the firing rate of the MK13 GMLS, it would make more sense to retain the MK-62, since the ship is now a dedicated Air defense ship.

If anything, I'd expect the MK-95 to be replaced with a MK-62 during the conversion, because it would make the ship more capable against long range targets, providing two firing channels.

_________________
Would you please not eat my gun...
[ img ]


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
acelanceloet
Post subject: Re: Independent Federation of Australia AUPosted: December 27th, 2013, 11:45 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 7510
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands
on the shackleton, may I suggest using the better SMART-S Mk 2 drawing on the dutch parts sheet, as this one is oversized A LOT.

_________________
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
erik_t
Post subject: Re: Independent Federation of Australia AUPosted: December 27th, 2013, 5:03 pm
Offline
Posts: 2936
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 11:38 pm
Location: Midwest US
MihoshiK wrote:
Another remark: Why replace the aft MK-62 on your Brisbane with a MK-95? The MK-62 is considerably longer ranged, and can still guide the Sea Sparrow. With the firing rate of the MK13 GMLS, it would make more sense to retain the MK-62, since the ship is now a dedicated Air defense ship.

If anything, I'd expect the MK-95 to be replaced with a MK-62 during the conversion, because it would make the ship more capable against long range targets, providing two firing channels.
I would agree with this.

Regarding the mixed presence of CEAMOUNT and SPG-62, I suspect the latter has considerably longer range (since the aperture is so much larger). Perhaps CEAMOUNT is intended more for medium-range usage?


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Blackbuck
Post subject: Re: Independent Federation of Australia AUPosted: December 27th, 2013, 5:33 pm
Offline
Posts: 2743
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 9:15 am
Location: Birmingham, United Kingdom
As I understand it CEAMOUNT doesn't have the legs to fully exploit SM-2 with the current power/size of the arrays. That's not to say that couldn't be resolved. Perhaps as has been mentioned stand-alone (and larger) CEAMOUNT illuminators would be a better choice.

_________________
AU Projects: | Banbha et al. | New England: The Divided States
Blood and Fire


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
erik_t
Post subject: Re: Independent Federation of Australia AUPosted: December 27th, 2013, 6:35 pm
Offline
Posts: 2936
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 11:38 pm
Location: Midwest US
That was my recollection. And that's... entirely justifiable, actually. I would strongly consider making that change.

I know one of Friedman's Naval Institute Guide to World Naval Weapon Systems shows a notional train-and-elevate large-panel CEAMOUNT. Two of these, to replace the SPG-62, seems eminently reasonable.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
LEUT_East
Post subject: Re: Independent Federation of Australia AUPosted: December 27th, 2013, 10:40 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 923
Joined: December 29th, 2011, 7:27 am
Location: Queensland, Australia
Modified Macquarie Island Class

Based on the Macquarie Island Class of the IFAN these vessels are primarily used as command ships for Coast Guard OPVs and as a transport for asylum seekers (from people trafficking boats) by using embarked habitat modules (containers). They also able to conduct patrols of Australias southern sovereign waters from the foot of Tasmania down to Antarctica.

Two vessels have been constructed of which IFACGS Shackleton (pictured) is based at IFACGS Base Darwin, North Australia and IFACGS Wilkins is based at IFACGS Base Rockhampton, Queensland.

IFACGS Shackleton
[ img ]

Macquarie Island Class Specifications:
Type Multi Mission Support Vessel
Crew 58 Coast Guard personnel but can also embark other personnel depending on mission including 20 Department of Immigration personnel, 5 Customs personnel, 5 Federal Police and up to 40 Coast Guard Cadets.
Displacement 13,500 tons
Length 141.5 metres
Beam 21.5 metres
Draught 9 metres
Speed 17.5 knots
Air and Surface Search Radar Thales SMART S (Mk 2)
Navigation Radar Lowrance NR-1080i
Guns 2 x Typhoon-G 25mm, 2 x .50 cal
Helicopters 1 x MRH 90 Taipan or 1 x HH-60H Coasthawk
Containerised Mission Modules Fully Equipped Personnel Habitat Modules, Surveying Modules, Disaster Relief Modules, Navigation Aides Maintenance Modules and General Stores Modules.
Propulsion 2 x diesels, 10,728shp

_________________
There is no "I" in TEAM but there is a ME

[ img ]
______________________
Current Worklist:
Redrawing my entire AU after a long absence from Shipbucket


Last edited by LEUT_East on December 30th, 2013, 4:39 am, edited 2 times in total.

Top
[Profile] [Quote]
eswube
Post subject: Re: Independent Federation of Australia AUPosted: December 27th, 2013, 10:53 pm
Offline
Posts: 10696
Joined: June 15th, 2011, 8:31 am
That's growing to one of the most impressive among AU threads. :)


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 6 of 76  [ 752 posts ]  Return to “Alternate Universe Designs” | Go to page « 14 5 6 7 876 »

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 22 guests


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]