Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 3 of 7  [ 62 posts ]  Go to page « 1 2 3 4 57 »
Author Message
klagldsf
Post subject: Re: A DestroyerPosted: November 19th, 2013, 12:23 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2765
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 4:14 pm
I want to point out that the Brooke class frigates were a compromised design (which is true of all ships in some manner) on the basis of cost. As a convoy/open ocean escort, they provided limited ASW and AAW capabilities (but still far more than a lone merchant ship with nothing at all) and were meant to operate in concert with other armed vessels, whether other Brookes (or Garcia class ships, or what have you) or more capable vessels like say a SpruCan or a Leahy. Also, the Brookes originally had a very short helicopter hangar (for DASH drones) so the original firing arc of the Mk 22 wasn't impeded until they upgraded to LAMPS. I'd rather have the missile launchers be less impeded than the gun, or take the gun out if you have to (like acelancelot said).

So the main thing you have to ask yourself is, what is the primary mission of this vessel? If it's to act as an ocean escort, then your standards of "good enough" will be lowered that much further. If it's going to be the primary AAW/ASW asset of your navy, then you probably won't want to compromise as much - then again, maybe you don't have much choice given the navy's budget. In which case you really better pay attention to what you want to prioritize.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
erik_t
Post subject: Re: A DestroyerPosted: November 19th, 2013, 12:37 am
Offline
Posts: 2936
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 11:38 pm
Location: Midwest US
When I suggested the WM20 egg, I meant to replace the SPG-53 forward. It can handle 5/54 gunlaying.

I think you'll agree that this substantially improves the arrangement ;)


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Kattsun
Post subject: Re: A DestroyerPosted: November 19th, 2013, 1:19 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 309
Joined: September 10th, 2012, 6:03 am
erik_t wrote:
When I suggested the WM20 egg, I meant to replace the SPG-53 forward. It can handle 5/54 gunlaying.

I think you'll agree that this substantially improves the arrangement ;)
Ah. This would solve many issues with aesthetics, although I disagree that it improves the vessel. The lack of a very visible, dish-like gun fire control radar detracts to the charm and anachronistic feel of the ship overall.

[ img ]
klagldsf wrote:
I want to point out that the Brooke class frigates were a compromised design (which is true of all ships in some manner) on the basis of cost. As a convoy/open ocean escort, they provided limited ASW and AAW capabilities (but still far more than a lone merchant ship with nothing at all) and were meant to operate in concert with other armed vessels, whether other Brookes (or Garcia class ships, or what have you) or more capable vessels like say a SpruCan or a Leahy. Also, the Brookes originally had a very short helicopter hangar (for DASH drones) so the original firing arc of the Mk 22 wasn't impeded until they upgraded to LAMPS. I'd rather have the missile launchers be less impeded than the gun, or take the gun out if you have to (like acelancelot said).

So the main thing you have to ask yourself is, what is the primary mission of this vessel? If it's to act as an ocean escort, then your standards of "good enough" will be lowered that much further. If it's going to be the primary AAW/ASW asset of your navy, then you probably won't want to compromise as much - then again, maybe you don't have much choice given the navy's budget. In which case you really better pay attention to what you want to prioritize.
It's supposed to act as a light, general purpose escort for keeping Megaconvoys of Detroit steel MBT-70s from being sunk by all the Akulas in the USSR. It's also supposed to work with British Type 82s and CVA-01 Invincibles to keep the Northern Sea free of Evil Commies like Delta IV and Project 748 assault submarines. In this regard it's about as well equipped as contemporary USN frigates to do this job (Garcia, Brooke, Knox, sea trial Perries).

It would probably also perform admirably in keeping the Soviet floating fish factories from stealing all of Gallia's cod. But cod is a secondary mission to keeping the Megaconvoys protected with other NATO light vessels and acting as ASW support for Allied carrier battlegroups.

I'm not sure where you're getting the idea that thing is going to operate alone, it lacks the air direction capability and datalinking necessary for independent operations. It would probably end up being supported by a Leahy or something that would act as a nerve center for air defence of the convoy, and the destroyers would be the ASW defence/cheap ships intended to eat Type 53-65 wake homing torpedoes so cruisers and CVAs don't.

Yes, these are cheap ships intended to be produced and operated within the greater fleet of the Allied navies. I'm not sure why they'd be anything else for a stereotypical Western European country, or where you got the idea that they were necessarily intended to operate alone by themselves.

The North Atlantic is not very big, I'm sure if The Final War happened in 1982 or so when all these things finished delivering, then they would necessarily be attached to American convoys and put under the command of American cruisers and destroyers, which are far larger and better equipped at handling duties such as command and control. Yes, this isn't a command ship, it's a ship that's intended to be part of a larger force, like all ships, and necessarily compromises in certain aspects such as protection. For example, the entire superstructure of aluminium. It's not intended to be a Spruance, or a Leahy, or other ships two or three times its tonnage. It's supposed to work with these ships instead, not replace them.

More importantly, this isn't a Brooke. It's not even designed by the same people, they didn't even look at a Brooke when making this ship, it just sort of happened to be a case of convergent evolution.

She's not intended to punch above her weight or anything, it's just a thing so Gallia can have a indigenous blue water force that isn't USN stock Leahys, Belknaps, Kitty Hawks, and Forrestals.

_________________
The Chinese people are not to be cowed by U.S. atomic blackmail. Our country has a population of 600 million and an area of 9.6 [million sq. km]. The United States cannot annihilate the Chinese nation with its small stack of atom bombs. Even if the U.S. atom bombs were so powerful that, when dropped on China, they would make a hole right through the earth, or even blow it up, that would hardly mean anything to the universe as a whole, though it might be a major event for the solar system.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
erik_t
Post subject: Re: A DestroyerPosted: November 19th, 2013, 2:24 am
Offline
Posts: 2936
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 11:38 pm
Location: Midwest US
A wise man might completely emulate the Perry fire control system, with a large-dish SPG-60 aft. This would also serve as a second gunlaying channel.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Kattsun
Post subject: Re: A DestroyerPosted: November 19th, 2013, 2:37 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 309
Joined: September 10th, 2012, 6:03 am
Surely SPG-51 provides enough missile tracking capacity aft.

_________________
The Chinese people are not to be cowed by U.S. atomic blackmail. Our country has a population of 600 million and an area of 9.6 [million sq. km]. The United States cannot annihilate the Chinese nation with its small stack of atom bombs. Even if the U.S. atom bombs were so powerful that, when dropped on China, they would make a hole right through the earth, or even blow it up, that would hardly mean anything to the universe as a whole, though it might be a major event for the solar system.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
TimothyC
Post subject: Re: A DestroyerPosted: November 19th, 2013, 2:39 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 3765
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:06 am
Contact: Website
The SPG-51 that you have on there is a version not used until after the Californias got their NTU upgrades.

_________________
𝐌𝐀𝐓𝐇𝐍𝐄𝐓- 𝑻𝒐 𝑪𝒐𝒈𝒊𝒕𝒂𝒕𝒆 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒕𝒐 𝑺𝒐𝒍𝒗𝒆


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Kattsun
Post subject: Re: A DestroyerPosted: November 19th, 2013, 2:46 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 309
Joined: September 10th, 2012, 6:03 am
My apologies, I assumed the little indiscernible bits of black and grey on the dish were merely extraneous pixels and not indicative of any sort of specific upgrades as such.

Anyway, yes this is SPG-51 Mod 15. The ship has NTU upgrades because it is supposed to be fairly modern.

[ img ]

_________________
The Chinese people are not to be cowed by U.S. atomic blackmail. Our country has a population of 600 million and an area of 9.6 [million sq. km]. The United States cannot annihilate the Chinese nation with its small stack of atom bombs. Even if the U.S. atom bombs were so powerful that, when dropped on China, they would make a hole right through the earth, or even blow it up, that would hardly mean anything to the universe as a whole, though it might be a major event for the solar system.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
TimothyC
Post subject: Re: A DestroyerPosted: November 19th, 2013, 2:57 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 3765
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:06 am
Contact: Website
Kattsun wrote:
My apologies, I assumed the little indiscernible bits of black and grey on the dish were merely extraneous pixels and not indicative of any sort of specific upgrades as such.
They are the second dish that is bolted to the primary on the Mod 15 that provides continuous wave illumination functionality. If you want to have this be a more modern ship than the initial systems would have for the IOC, I suggest that you note that on the drawing (just so it's clear to everyone).

_________________
𝐌𝐀𝐓𝐇𝐍𝐄𝐓- 𝑻𝒐 𝑪𝒐𝒈𝒊𝒕𝒂𝒕𝒆 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒕𝒐 𝑺𝒐𝒍𝒗𝒆


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Kattsun
Post subject: Re: A DestroyerPosted: November 19th, 2013, 3:01 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 309
Joined: September 10th, 2012, 6:03 am
TimothyC wrote:
Kattsun wrote:
My apologies, I assumed the little indiscernible bits of black and grey on the dish were merely extraneous pixels and not indicative of any sort of specific upgrades as such.
They are the second dish that is bolted to the primary on the Mod 15 that provides continuous wave illumination functionality. If you want to have this be a more modern ship than the initial systems would have for the IOC, I suggest that you note that on the drawing (just so it's clear to everyone).
I certainly shall (have) do (done) this.

[ img ]

_________________
The Chinese people are not to be cowed by U.S. atomic blackmail. Our country has a population of 600 million and an area of 9.6 [million sq. km]. The United States cannot annihilate the Chinese nation with its small stack of atom bombs. Even if the U.S. atom bombs were so powerful that, when dropped on China, they would make a hole right through the earth, or even blow it up, that would hardly mean anything to the universe as a whole, though it might be a major event for the solar system.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
erik_t
Post subject: Re: A DestroyerPosted: November 19th, 2013, 5:21 pm
Offline
Posts: 2936
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 11:38 pm
Location: Midwest US
Kattsun wrote:
Surely SPG-51 provides enough missile tracking capacity aft.
I meant large-dish SPG-60 instead of SPG-51, not in addition to it. Sorry for any confusion.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 3 of 7  [ 62 posts ]  Return to “Beginners Only” | Go to page « 1 2 3 4 57 »

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 54 guests


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]