| Shipbucket http://67.205.157.234/forums/ |
|
| canadian multi role destroyer http://67.205.157.234/forums/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=5017 |
Page 1 of 2 |
| Author: | rifleman [ March 15th, 2014, 7:50 am ] |
| Post subject: | canadian multi role destroyer |
http://www.casr.ca/mp-dorschner-rcn-absalon-ddh.htm interesting weapons combinations |
|
| Author: | heuhen [ March 15th, 2014, 11:49 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: canadian multi role destroyer |
he that have done that have no knowledge about ships. - first VLS next to APAR. to high up and to close to radar. (would I say). why not just put them on the weapon deck like the original ship have them. - then the suggested VLS position on the forward deck. can't do that either due to hull strength. there are so many bad things in this.... |
|
| Author: | acelanceloet [ March 15th, 2014, 7:57 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: canadian multi role destroyer |
and keeping in mind that there is already an ship on this hull with that weapon system in an completely different setup..... |
|
| Author: | Thiel [ March 15th, 2014, 8:03 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: canadian multi role destroyer |
I find it interesting that he insists on modifying the ship to take ESSM when it already carries 36 of them. |
|
| Author: | klagldsf [ March 15th, 2014, 8:07 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: canadian multi role destroyer |
I'm most familiar with "CSAR," it's a lot better than either Sparky or Kopp but ultimately it's the musings of an armchair general/admiral with a desire for pie-in-the-sky projects (a return to glory when Canada still had the Arrow and aircraft carriers) with a lot of budget solutions that, while good on paper are very half-baked on closer inspection. Plus there's a very strong, overt more-than-just-paranoid attitude about the U.S. and Denmark somehow being the true enemies of Canada. Which makes this proposal especially ironic. |
|
| Author: | Philbob [ March 24th, 2014, 5:09 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: canadian multi role destroyer |
Ive been thinking about this latly and was thinking they should actually pair up with Australia and build modified Hobarts but with just the AUSPAR radars and lift their old weapons off their current frigates. |
|
| Author: | Charwhick [ March 24th, 2014, 5:31 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: canadian multi role destroyer |
Why not pair up with America on another flight of Burkes? |
|
| Author: | Rodondo [ March 24th, 2014, 5:35 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: canadian multi role destroyer |
Mhm, would be a interesting and logical decision to pair up the us Aussies |
|
| Author: | klagldsf [ March 24th, 2014, 5:36 am ] | |
| Post subject: | Re: canadian multi role destroyer | |
Why not pair up with America on another flight of Burkes?
That's a bit overkill, the Hobarts make more sense.
|
||
| Author: | Charwhick [ March 24th, 2014, 5:40 am ] | ||
| Post subject: | Re: canadian multi role destroyer | ||
Why not pair up with America on another flight of Burkes?
That's a bit overkill, the Hobarts make more sense. |
|||
| Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|