| Shipbucket http://67.205.157.234/forums/ |
|
| Mutiny http://67.205.157.234/forums/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=255 |
Page 4 of 6 |
| Author: | Colosseum [ September 26th, 2010, 7:37 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Mutiny |
As always, if you guys provide me with high-quality, neatly-labelled parts sheets, I will upload them. |
|
| Author: | Demon Lord Razgriz [ September 26th, 2010, 7:38 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Mutiny |
Well, can't make it ultra simple. But it can be simplified by putting an end to the endless improvements of the same part over & over. Once you've drawn the part to detail, don't redo it again. :/ And if I had all the up to date parts, I'd be more than happy to put them into sheets. |
|
| Author: | Mitchell van Os [ September 26th, 2010, 7:47 pm ] | |
| Post subject: | Re: Mutiny | |
Well, can't make it ultra simple. But it can be simplified by putting an end to the endless improvements of the same part over & over. Once you've drawn the part to detail, don't redo it again. :/
As i recall i only updated all the dutch parts i have right now.And if I had all the up to date parts, I'd be more than happy to put them into sheets. Because they where wrong by a lot, and very old. Its more then 1-2 years that they where not updated. And i use them for my frigate's i currently make + rotterdam class lpd. The only thing that needs a redrawn are the ships L-S-LG-LCF-Johan de witt atm. |
||
| Author: | acelanceloet [ September 26th, 2010, 7:50 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Mutiny |
mitch, why do you think this is aimed directly at you? you are starting to defence yourself with this post, which is not needed IMO. he is right about the fact that we should concentrate on drawing parts that are not yet drawn, and only improve parts that really need that! |
|
| Author: | Mitchell van Os [ September 26th, 2010, 7:53 pm ] | |
| Post subject: | Re: Mutiny | |
mitch, why do you think this is aimed directly at you? you are starting to defence yourself with this post, which is not needed IMO. he is right about the fact that we should concentrate on drawing parts that are not yet drawn, and only improve parts that really need that!
I only recall the part of what i updated the last time.The rest i have nothing to say about because i didnt do it. But i do know the dutch sheet is like as most updated as possible, to the best details you can do. Instead half pixels is the new revolutionairy thing in the world... |
||
| Author: | Colosseum [ September 26th, 2010, 8:04 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Mutiny |
Sorry guys, I must have forgotten to upgrade MitcheLL to Super-Administrator and Site Owner position. His contributions definitely deserve it; he's done far more for the website than any of us (or, hell, all of us combined!) |
|
| Author: | Praetonia [ September 27th, 2010, 10:03 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Mutiny |
Since when did shipbucket become about user titles and stupid forum politics? Just draw some damn ships. |
|
| Author: | Finfan [ September 27th, 2010, 10:05 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Mutiny |
Colo you should ban all these uppity bastards, starting with the OP it seems power has gone to his head |
|
| Author: | Portsmouth Bill [ September 28th, 2010, 7:36 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Mutiny |
Praetonia, Finfan. Are you seperate members? Or one with two accounts? Its the 'deal with it' cartoon: I can't beleive two people would choose the same. |
|
| Author: | TurretHead [ September 28th, 2010, 8:06 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Mutiny |
I don't know if Praetonia/Finfan is a long established member from the old forum with lots of drawn ships. But if he isn't then if you want to clean up this forum I would suggest deleting members like that who don't draw anything but just come here and try and rip down the work and opinions of contributing members. |
|
| Page 4 of 6 | All times are UTC |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|